RRQ 2-0 GE
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.55 1.15 | 238 268 165 | 16 13 3 | / 7 7 0 / | 4 3 1 | +9 +6 +3 | 88% 92% 80% | 167 189 114 | 24% 30% 8% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.33 1.46 1.01 | 227 239 201 | 15 11 4 | / 8 7 1 / | 5 5 0 | +7 +4 +3 | 82% 92% 60% | 163 164 162 | 30% 28% 36% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.12 1.18 1.00 | 175 190 139 | 11 9 2 | / 8 5 3 / | 5 3 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 82% 83% 80% | 118 125 102 | 29% 33% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.12 1.47 0.28 | 287 324 201 | 16 13 3 | / 13 8 5 / | 9 8 1 | +3 +5 -2 | 82% 92% 60% | 171 194 116 | 13% 9% 30% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.01 0.83 1.44 | 201 167 282 | 13 8 5 | / 11 8 3 / | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | 76% 67% 100% | 127 110 167 | 29% 22% 45% | 3 1 2 | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 1.17 1.15 | 273 231 292 | 15 4 11 | / 13 3 10 / | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | 59% 60% 58% | 169 129 186 | 23% 27% 20% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.34 1.03 | 294 317 285 | 15 5 10 | / 15 4 11 / | 1 1 0 | 0 +1 -1 | 53% 80% 42% | 182 182 182 | 15% 19% 13% | 5 2 3 | 1 0 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.64 0.44 0.73 | 123 24 165 | 6 0 6 | / 14 3 11 / | 9 3 6 | -8 -3 -5 | 71% 60% 75% | 81 9 111 | 29% 0% 32% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.59 1.27 0.30 | 125 204 93 | 8 4 4 | / 14 3 11 / | 2 2 0 | -6 +1 -7 | 59% 100% 42% | 74 104 62 | 14% 6% 23% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.30 0.28 0.31 | 68 62 71 | 3 1 2 | / 15 4 11 / | 6 4 2 | -12 -3 -9 | 59% 80% 50% | 45 36 49 | 7% 0% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.11 1.30 | 239 264 209 | 61 39 22 | / 41 21 20 / | 6 1 5 | +20 +18 +2 | 75% 71% 79% | 157 169 141 | 26% 27% 24% | 9 6 3 | 5 4 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.98 1.21 1.07 | 183 172 205 | 27 17 10 | / 23 14 9 / | 11 4 7 | +4 +3 +1 | 79% 83% 73% | 122 113 137 | 31% 39% 25% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.17 0.94 1.07 | 176 177 155 | 41 24 17 | / 38 21 17 / | 26 17 9 | +3 +3 0 | 73% 76% 69% | 113 123 99 | 24% 25% 23% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.14 0.96 1.06 | 191 189 188 | 47 27 20 | / 45 24 21 / | 25 19 6 | +2 +3 -1 | 70% 76% 62% | 124 121 129 | 25% 27% 23% | 5 3 2 | 3 2 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.10 0.68 0.92 | 251 285 200 | 51 35 16 | / 57 31 26 / | 26 13 13 | -6 +4 -10 | 75% 79% 69% | 156 177 128 | 14% 18% 7% | 15 9 6 | 14 9 5 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.66 0.62 0.64 | 140 97 183 | 14 6 8 | / 23 10 13 / | 7 3 4 | -9 -4 -5 | 61% 57% 64% | 99 63 135 | 23% 21% 24% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 0.98 1.19 | 281 345 237 | 66 35 31 | / 53 22 31 / | 7 3 4 | +13 +13 0 | 66% 83% 53% | 176 209 151 | 32% 39% 24% | 18 10 8 | 12 5 7 | +6 +5 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.99 0.99 | 241 229 243 | 55 24 31 | / 51 21 30 / | 4 2 2 | +4 +3 +1 | 66% 69% 63% | 148 138 155 | 24% 23% 24% | 7 2 5 | 12 6 6 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
1.07 0.81 0.92 | 173 173 188 | 42 19 23 | / 47 16 31 / | 15 7 8 | -5 +3 -8 | 72% 86% 61% | 132 127 135 | 22% 20% 23% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.78 0.88 | 152 171 154 | 32 18 14 | / 46 18 28 / | 28 13 15 | -14 0 -14 | 73% 76% 71% | 117 125 111 | 18% 21% 15% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.78 0.78 0.78 | 140 121 161 | 32 12 20 | / 44 16 28 / | 22 9 13 | -12 -4 -8 | 69% 66% 71% | 88 67 104 | 30% 25% 33% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.20 1.69 0.71 | 215 260 171 | 23 15 8 | / 19 7 12 / | 5 0 5 | +4 +8 -4 | 68% 64% 71% | 144 172 117 | 21% 23% 17% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.06 1.11 1.01 | 183 180 188 | 19 9 10 | / 21 9 12 / | 13 10 3 | -2 0 -2 | 71% 71% 71% | 111 102 120 | 21% 21% 21% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.88 0.83 0.93 | 245 270 221 | 19 12 7 | / 26 13 13 / | 12 1 11 | -7 -1 -6 | 64% 57% 71% | 160 163 156 | 18% 31% 7% | 8 4 4 | 8 5 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.80 0.85 0.75 | 131 134 129 | 12 5 7 | / 20 9 11 / | 12 8 4 | -8 -4 -4 | 57% 64% 50% | 87 98 76 | 25% 21% 31% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.64 0.66 0.62 | 140 97 183 | 14 6 8 | / 23 10 13 / | 7 3 4 | -9 -4 -5 | 61% 57% 64% | 99 63 135 | 23% 21% 24% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.59 1.25 | 316 370 264 | 33 19 14 | / 20 10 10 / | 5 2 3 | +13 +9 +4 | 75% 86% 64% | 190 222 158 | 45% 46% 43% | 11 7 4 | 5 3 2 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.26 1.14 1.38 | 227 165 290 | 24 10 14 | / 16 6 10 / | 5 0 5 | +8 +4 +4 | 79% 79% 79% | 172 135 209 | 27% 23% 30% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.07 1.06 1.08 | 179 163 195 | 15 8 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 16 7 9 | -1 0 -1 | 82% 79% 86% | 127 123 131 | 15% 24% 10% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.91 1.29 0.53 | 164 212 118 | 16 11 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 6 3 3 | +1 +5 -4 | 71% 86% 57% | 94 112 77 | 25% 21% 33% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.90 1.04 0.76 | 214 256 172 | 21 13 8 | / 20 10 10 / | 3 2 1 | +1 +3 -2 | 71% 79% 64% | 141 167 115 | 27% 33% 17% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.65 1.78 1.49 | 302 366 226 | 25 16 9 | / 11 6 5 / | 0 0 0 | +14 +10 +4 | 82% 83% 80% | 196 224 162 | 34% 40% 25% | 3 3 0 | 1 1 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.13 1.15 1.10 | 159 138 185 | 13 6 7 | / 11 5 6 / | 10 6 4 | +2 +1 +1 | 82% 75% 90% | 104 86 125 | 24% 22% 25% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.02 0.78 1.31 | 191 153 238 | 16 8 8 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 1 5 | +1 -1 +2 | 77% 83% 70% | 125 101 154 | 33% 47% 26% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.87 0.86 0.87 | 163 148 181 | 13 7 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 4 3 | -3 -1 -2 | 59% 67% 50% | 111 100 124 | 27% 38% 21% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.81 1.04 0.52 | 220 263 170 | 16 10 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 5 4 1 | -2 0 -2 | 82% 92% 70% | 139 178 93 | 10% 18% 0% | 4 3 1 | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.32 0.90 | 210 236 189 | 14 9 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 6 2 4 | -1 +3 -4 | 73% 70% 75% | 160 174 149 | 28% 24% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.99 0.85 1.11 | 237 189 277 | 19 7 12 | / 18 8 10 / | 0 0 0 | +1 -1 +2 | 64% 60% 67% | 139 103 170 | 20% 5% 35% | 4 2 2 | 5 2 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.95 1.36 0.62 | 233 324 157 | 18 11 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 1 0 1 | 0 +3 -3 | 64% 80% 50% | 153 203 111 | 34% 44% 22% | 2 1 1 | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.76 0.87 0.67 | 166 170 164 | 10 5 5 | / 17 7 10 / | 8 5 3 | -7 -2 -5 | 73% 90% 58% | 125 127 124 | 18% 24% 13% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.24 1.12 | 133 43 208 | 10 1 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 3 4 | -5 -6 +1 | 64% 40% 83% | 86 35 129 | 38% 60% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
I think GE can beat RRQ, they are looking very good rn, they were able to handle their emotions well during their match with Enigma. They also say that they win when it matters the most which is right to some extent, in the last two lan events they worked through lower brackets and then finally won both the tournaments. Also they are the only team to have qualified for APAC 3 times. Although APAC also matters and they have failed at that stage which I think has less to do with their skills and more to do with their composure, emotions and mentality. If their mental game is on point then they can win or atleast they will make alter ego fight for victory. Nothing can be said for sure since they have played very little against sea teams.
Life of an Indian/SA Valorant fan-
Wake up>snort in 40 litres of HOPIUM>make a 1000 comment thread for a matchup as a form of support>get rekt and BMed> heartbreak, depression, anxiety from a devastating loss as well as from the Indo, Filipino and Viet comments against India> go crying into the bed> repeat.
P.S- It hurts and is not funny anymore as it has been the same story for the past 2 years. Don't know whether me, my children or my grandchildren would ever see an Indian flag on the Masters/Champions stage in their lifetime.
Anyway, this will be my last post and will consider deleting my account as I have lost a lot of my precious time and energy supporting this hopeless region with every bit of enthusiasm in the last 2 years.
I wish everyone I met on VLR a happy and prosperous life ahead.
Skrossi will shock everyone
There's no way GE can lose to RRQ. RRQ has no experience even if they did it's simply not enough if they're going up against the caliber of GE, who has been one of the top dogs of apac for 2 years, they're veterans.
We all know that GE far surpasses RRQ's individual skills. it's the team work and communication that they're lacking but I fully trust that they already ironed all the issues out to close this game with a clean 2-0
Skrossi will shock everyone
There's no way GE can lose to Griffin. Griffin has no experience even if they did it's simply not enough if they're going up against the caliber of GE, who has been one of the top dogs of apac for 2 years, they're veterans.
We all know that GE far surpasses Griffin's individual skills. it's the team work and communication that they're lacking but I fully trust that they already ironed all the issues out to close this game with a clean 2-0
Skrossi will shock everyone
There's no way GE can lose to RRQ. RRQ has no experience even if they did it's simply not enough if they're going up against the caliber of GE, who has been one of the top dogs of apac for 2 years, they're veterans.
We all know that GE far surpasses RRQ's individual skills. it's the team work and communication that they're lacking but I fully trust that they already ironed all the issues out to close this game with a clean 2-0
Skrossi will shock everyone
There's no way GE can lose to RRQ. RRQ has no experience even if they did it's simply not enough if they're going up against the caliber of GE, who has been one of the top dogs of apac for 2 years, they're veterans.
We all know that GE far surpasses RRQ's individual skills. it's the team work and communication that they're lacking but I fully trust that they already ironed all the issues out to close this game with a clean 2-0
Reason why Indian teams are bad in the game is because all the players in Mumbai server are overall bad in general. Bad opponents produces bad winners because winners develop bad habits to win the game. And the reason they are bad? Well, India is a mobile gaming dominant country. We get access to a decent gaming pc very late but mobiles are easily available.
like I said their gameplan and play looks like our scenes in early days, but we came a long way after our bad international results since then we have more structured and methodological plays. idk about SA scenes, the only exposure I got, well, in this time and everytime they're matched against other SEA teams they fell shorts because they're making the same mistakes and I felt no improvement as in learning from their mistakes and so on.