After Sinatraa's tweet why did she made her account private ? SUS
0
CLEO TWITTER - PRIVATE
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
patuj [#3]Maybe getting hundreds of negative comments and DMs may not be the best experience. Guy like Sinatraa could literally murder someone and there would still be people attacking the victim's family.
I think that's a bit of a stretch, even if for the sake of hyperbole.
Big difference between a confirmed case and one that is inconclusive.
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
edit: formatting
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
Well if he's proven guilty...sure....if he isn't..Cleo should be imprisoned and executed
heavnsent [#12]If you're asking this question unironically then you are as braindead as sinatraa, not even trolling.
^
TmhariMummy [#13]Well if he's proven guilty...sure....if he isn't..Cleo should be imprisoned and executed
I say execute them both and let allah determine their fate
queueK [#7]I think that's a bit of a stretch, even if for the sake of hyperbole.
Big difference between a confirmed case and one that is inconclusive.
the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
Sinatraa literally said in his twitlonger to not attack Cleo but his fanboys do it anyways. He wasn't leading them to anything they are just that braindead.
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
Didn’t he tell his fans to stop harassing her in a twitlonger?
queueK [#7]I think that's a bit of a stretch, even if for the sake of hyperbole.
Big difference between a confirmed case and one that is inconclusive.
Sorry, strong disagree on your initial point.
never underestimate the fandoms.
ipok6 [#22]the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
Nobody knows if he did it or not, he was an abusive boyfriend, but Innocent on the other charges until proven guilty.
ipok6 [#22]the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
and who knows he did it? even the authorities doesnt? I'm not defending him but the amount of people that think he did it without any concrete proof is as bad as the people riding sinatraa's dick.
if the authorities found nothing then he is innocent
remember the term "innocent until proven guilty"?
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
did you read his "clarification" twitlonger though? he said not to harass cleo there, and if anybody is still doing that they are just braindead imo.
he is innocent until proven guilty. again he is INNOCENT
until he is proven to be GUILTY by the AUTHORITIES
not by riot.
If he is proven guilty then yes fuck him he deserves it.
but if he isn't then fuck Cleo for being a lying bitch
ipok6 [#22]the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
the number of sinatraa fans who think that he did it*
nobody but them 2 will ever know the truth, and this is coming from someone who dislikes him
dupreeeeeehalt [#5]because sinatraa is leading his fanboys to defend him and instigating them to harass cleo, sinatraa should be imprisoned and should be executed in future for what he did
edit: formatting
I don't watch the dude, but I HIGHLY doubt he lead his fanboys to defend him or instigated them to harass cleo. If he did, that would've been big news
idkmate99 [#33]the number of sinatraa fans who think that he did it*
nobody but them 2 will ever know the truth, and this is coming from someone who dislikes him
no shit sherlock
obviously only they can be certain, but it aint hard to look at the evidence and draw the obvious conclusion
falsefy [#31]and who knows he did it? even the authorities doesnt? I'm not defending him but the amount of people that think he did it without any concrete proof is as bad as the people riding sinatraa's dick.
if the authorities found nothing then he is innocentremember the term "innocent until proven guilty"?
anyone who's listened to the audio knows unless they're in denial.
innocent until proven guilty applies to the courts. if cleo hadnt presented evidence then sure, we can assume his innocence, but given that theres pretty damning evidence against him that he has been unable to refute, pretty easy to see the logical conclusion
Easy_for_MWZERA [#29]Nobody knows if he did it or not, he was an abusive boyfriend, but Innocent on the other charges until proven guilty.
anyone who's listened to the audio knows unless they're in denial.
innocent until proven guilty applies to the courts. if cleo hadnt presented evidence then sure, we can assume his innocence, but given that theres pretty damning evidence against him that he has been unable to refute, pretty easy to see the logical conclusion
ipok6 [#37]anyone who's listened to the audio knows unless they're in denial.
innocent until proven guilty applies to the courts. if cleo hadnt presented evidence then sure, we can assume his innocence, but given that theres pretty damning evidence against him that he has been unable to refute, pretty easy to see the logical conclusion
according to judges and the law, the audio clip counts as inconclusive evidence. SO to you, it may be obvious that sinatraa is guilty, but since he has not been given a punishment or anything, he is still considered innocent according to the law. Therefore, the evidence can't be considered "damning" which means that no "logical conclusion" can be made, unless the logical conclusion is what you think and not what the law thinks.
unknown_trash [#39]according to judges and the law, the audio clip counts as inconclusive evidence. SO to you, it may be obvious that sinatraa is guilty, but since he has not been given a punishment or anything, he is still considered innocent according to the law. Therefore, the evidence can't be considered "damning" which means that no "logical conclusion" can be made, unless the logical conclusion is what you think and not what the law thinks.
exactly. There's and audio clip without video, they were giggling, her tone wasn't bad, how is this hard enough evidenced for convicting someone of sexual assault or rape?
unknown_trash [#39]according to judges and the law, the audio clip counts as inconclusive evidence. SO to you, it may be obvious that sinatraa is guilty, but since he has not been given a punishment or anything, he is still considered innocent according to the law. Therefore, the evidence can't be considered "damning" which means that no "logical conclusion" can be made, unless the logical conclusion is what you think and not what the law thinks.
believe it or not, its possible for the logical conclusion to be that someone is guilty without them having gone to court and been convicted.
Discord