Idk why people care about these 4 gold players ratings lol. Like they even have a single clue what makes a team good. Putting liquid 9th is actually criminal. A bad liquid could still beat majority of the other teams at their peak.
0
Platchat are actually clueless
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
not all colour casters are the highest ranks and best players in the game, not sure why that part's important
but i do agree, sometimes their calls are a bit questionable. but still it's a power ranking, so just based on the amount of dominance and power teams have had within their regions very recently, and liquid have been looking a bit off
HaSanity [#6]i need someone to compare their old takes after the games played and i want to see if they were correct, this is the only way their takes can be taken seriously
As far as I remember they have never been correct, always bad takes, they actually thought Vikings were going to be one of the best in Iceland + They thought Sentinels were going to be good in Masters 3 + Derke top21 player
Sugma [#10]I just find them funny and enjoyable to watchparty
delete this now, you MUST flame the podcasters for having opinions.
babysasuke [#13]delete this now, you MUST flame the podcasters for having opinions.
my bad man, let's go tarik!!!
Bo0mShell [#9]They always seemed lost to me. I don't know why everyone was saying their watch parties are the best during Berlin
Cause they were funny as fuck
radow [#4]clueless isnt the word, but yeah, even as an avid watcher, some of their takes are weird
I’d rather them have occasionally hot takes than just say whatever the common community opinion is though
Strafe7 [#15]Funniest thing about this is that they’re all higher than plat. And you act like you know what makes a team good lol
that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
harriman [#14]You sound like a baby lmao. And you realize they are all high diamond or immortal right?
Boosted lol
mave [#18]that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
They didnt get a copy of the script, what do you want from them honestly.
mave [#18]that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
Almost no one is completely right, and usually they get a good idea of stuff. They always say eu is the best and will do well, which is what happens. I cant really think of any preds that were horribly wrong other than last iceland about vikings
mave [#18]that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
predicting an esports (or really, a sports) tournament's outcomes is really fucking hard if not nigh-impossible when there are so many factors that influence the outcome.
the reason their takes are parrotted is because they offer at least some evidence from games to support their arguments (most of the time), not because they're accurate.
babysasuke [#23]They didnt get a copy of the script, what do you want from them honestly.
Not to give terrible fucking takes that make 0 sense
Mdkns [#22]Not to give terrible fucking takes that make 0 sense
Takes like this?
"They haven’t really had to qualify for anything because of their previous placements but now they will have to go through opens and get exposed! I wonder what the excuse will be after getting knocked out by some tier 2/3 team." - Generic VLR Clown (aka you)
Strafe7 [#20]Almost no one is completely right, and usually they get a good idea of stuff. They always say eu is the best and will do well, which is what happens. I cant really think of any preds that were horribly wrong other than last iceland about vikings
- vikings 2. na dominating eu at berlin masters, they weren't even sure g2 would beat f4q (thought it would be really close) 3. top 20 player list at champions was completely wrong 4. Sentinels top 3 team at champions
queueK [#21]predicting an esports (or really, a sports) tournament's outcomes is really fucking hard if not nigh-impossible when there are so many factors that influence the outcome.
the reason their takes are parrotted is because they offer at least some evidence from games to support their arguments (most of the time), not because they're accurate.
somewhat true, but if you look at predictions in other games like league they are correct a lot of times
sebert112 [#3]not all colour casters are the highest ranks and best players in the game, not sure why that part's important
but i do agree, sometimes their calls are a bit questionable. but still it's a power ranking, so just based on the amount of dominance and power teams have had within their regions very recently, and liquid have been looking a bit off
why are you downfragged
mave [#25]somewhat true, but if you look at predictions in other games like league they are correct a lot of times
to be fair, the meta in league changes less and the game has been out for 10 years
mave [#18]that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
there is a reason balla, sideshow bren were hired by riot
wyatt was interviewed and praised by nadeshot
and u mave, are fighting with others on vlr
clearly one side knows better
Gyro [#29]there is a reason balla, sideshow bren were hired by riot
wyatt was interviewed and praised by nadeshotand u mave, are fighting with others on vlr
clearly one side knows better
yeah because me arguing on vlr magically makes their horrible takes in the past good edit: never claimed i would be a good analyst just pointed out that their takes have been shit in the past + they get hired because they are really entertaining a lot of people like to watch them me included
mave [#24]
- vikings 2. na dominating eu at berlin masters, they weren't even sure g2 would beat f4q (thought it would be really close) 3. top 20 player list at champions was completely wrong 4. Sentinels top 3 team at champions
Main issue was derke wasnt on the list, also literally no one thought that sentinels had fallen off that hard so it makes sense. Sure it’s a little high but no one thought they were getting grouped lol.Also all of them thought g2 would win but f4q had a chance which they did take a map. Besides literally everyone has been really wrong about something in val, no one actually knows what will happen
babysasuke [#2]Liqud isnt top 5 EMEA +Trent owns them
Liquid literally finished in the top 5 and in someone of your family which I dont want do specify
idkbro [#8]As far as I remember they have never been correct, always bad takes, they actually thought Vikings were going to be one of the best in Iceland + They thought Sentinels were going to be good in Masters 3 + Derke top21 player
everyone thought that brazil wouldve been better in iceland, we just didnt realize they were abysmal back then
PrTsty [#33]Liquid literally finished in the top 5 and in someone of your family which I dont want do specify
ratio den
PrTsty [#33]Liquid literally finished in the top 5 and in someone of your family which I dont want do specify
W post my friend, thank you for your contribution, I have seen the error of my ways.
exxem [#28]to be fair, the meta in league changes less and the game has been out for 10 years
yeah its hard in a new game, league was a bad example
ThePhvraoh [#34]everyone thought that brazil wouldve been better in iceland, we just didnt realize they were abysmal back then
no1 who has high level understanding of the game did I believe, every1 expected NA and EU to dominate, the only other region that was somewhat decent was Korea, my eyes were bleeding when I watched Brazil/SEA/Japan and KRU for the first time
mave [#18]that doesn't change the fact that their takes have been horribly wrong a lot of times in the past
If you were putting out all of the takes you had online surely some people would say the same thing
idkbro [#8]As far as I remember they have never been correct, always bad takes, they actually thought Vikings were going to be one of the best in Iceland + They thought Sentinels were going to be good in Masters 3 + Derke top21 player
who tf didnt think sentinels was going to be good in masters 3???
idkbro [#8]As far as I remember they have never been correct, always bad takes, they actually thought Vikings were going to be one of the best in Iceland + They thought Sentinels were going to be good in Masters 3 + Derke top21 player
They didn't say that. You're wrong, you can watch the video
idkbro [#37]no1 who has high level understanding of the game did I believe, every1 expected NA and EU to dominate, the only other region that was somewhat decent was Korea, my eyes were bleeding when I watched Brazil/SEA/Japan and KRU for the first time
sure lol
turkey [#40]who tf didnt think sentinels was going to be good in masters 3???
why would you, they never played the game properly nor had the best firepower so you would expect them to fall off when every1 gets better at the game and start punishing them
Bo0mShell [#9]They always seemed lost to me. I don't know why everyone was saying their watch parties are the best during Berlin
Green Square
idkbro [#44]why would you, they never played the game properly nor had the best firepower so you would expect them to fall off when every1 gets better at the game and start punishing them
it was like 3 months after they won masters 1 without dropping a map and they still hardcore dominated NA
Discord