Envy - 100T ¯_ʘ‿ʘ_/¯
Minor updates to observing
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
239 125 | 26 11 15 | / 17 11 6 / | 2 2 0 | +9 0 +9 | 190 113 | 29% 29% 29% | 5 3 2 | 3 2 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
197 70 | 19 13 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 7 2 5 | +4 +4 0 | 129 52 | 18% 21% 15% | 1 1 0 | 1 2 -1 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
197 117 | 18 7 11 | / 22 12 10 / | 7 3 4 | -4 -5 +1 | 121 71 | 9% 8% 10% | 5 1 4 | 5 2 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
178 112 | 18 9 9 | / 20 10 10 / | 7 3 4 | -2 -1 -1 | 117 64 | 29% 30% 27% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
165 102 | 16 6 10 | / 23 12 11 / | 5 2 3 | -7 -6 -1 | 107 63 | 18% 14% 21% | 1 0 1 | 6 2 4 | -5 -2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
237 110 | 25 13 12 | / 22 11 11 / | 8 4 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 143 60 | 28% 25% 31% | 2 2 0 | 3 0 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |||
|
206 132 | 18 6 12 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 3 2 | +1 -5 +6 | 165 114 | 19% 29% 13% | 4 2 2 | 1 1 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
197 108 | 20 9 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 3 5 | +2 0 +2 | 142 70 | 19% 23% 16% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
195 124 | 16 6 10 | / 23 12 11 / | 8 3 5 | -7 -6 -1 | 134 88 | 24% 21% 26% | 5 2 3 | 4 3 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
181 79 | 18 10 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | 103 37 | 16% 20% 7% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
216 141 | 72 25 47 | / 60 31 29 / | 14 8 6 | +12 -6 +18 | 155 101 | 36% 34% 37% | 13 4 9 | 8 5 3 | +5 -1 +6 | |||
|
216 132 | 70 28 42 | / 69 33 36 / | 17 7 10 | +1 -5 +6 | 130 79 | 14% 14% 15% | 14 6 8 | 9 6 3 | +5 0 +5 | |||
|
207 107 | 63 35 28 | / 52 24 28 / | 31 12 19 | +11 +11 0 | 130 70 | 20% 26% 15% | 4 3 1 | 2 2 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
190 100 | 59 28 31 | / 68 34 34 / | 18 9 9 | -9 -6 -3 | 137 79 | 17% 15% 18% | 11 5 6 | 19 7 12 | -8 -2 -6 | |||
|
187 122 | 60 26 34 | / 67 31 36 / | 19 7 12 | -7 -5 -2 | 120 75 | 27% 26% 27% | 7 2 5 | 5 2 3 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
234 119 | 66 30 36 | / 72 42 30 / | 24 16 8 | -6 -12 +6 | 149 72 | 21% 20% 22% | 18 10 8 | 18 6 12 | 0 +4 -4 | |||
|
209 96 | 73 40 33 | / 53 27 26 / | 28 16 12 | +20 +13 +7 | 143 57 | 26% 29% 23% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
200 76 | 65 42 23 | / 62 36 26 / | 14 8 6 | +3 +6 -3 | 114 35 | 14% 14% 14% | 9 2 7 | 8 2 6 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
185 110 | 51 21 30 | / 66 39 27 / | 27 11 16 | -15 -18 +3 | 135 80 | 20% 25% 17% | 8 5 3 | 13 4 9 | -5 +1 -6 | |||
|
182 86 | 61 34 27 | / 71 39 32 / | 33 14 19 | -10 -5 -5 | 119 52 | 27% 29% 26% | 6 4 2 | 6 2 4 | 0 +2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
259 105 | 22 13 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 2 1 1 | +7 +5 +2 | 168 78 | 20% 13% 33% | 5 4 1 | 6 2 4 | -1 +2 -3 | |||
|
248 166 | 21 7 14 | / 17 8 9 / | 1 0 1 | +4 -1 +5 | 145 96 | 15% 21% 11% | 2 1 1 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
184 99 | 15 9 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 3 1 2 | -3 +1 -4 | 120 61 | 28% 39% 21% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
180 116 | 15 4 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -3 +5 | 126 78 | 47% 26% 71% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
102 46 | 8 5 3 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 2 2 | -7 -2 -5 | 70 29 | 13% 22% 5% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
260 145 | 19 7 12 | / 18 9 9 / | 10 8 2 | +1 -2 +3 | 169 82 | 14% 10% 21% | 5 3 2 | 5 1 4 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
201 82 | 19 12 7 | / 12 6 6 / | 6 3 3 | +7 +6 +1 | 134 53 | 29% 24% 42% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
184 100 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 3 5 | -4 -2 -2 | 127 68 | 24% 37% 18% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
165 66 | 14 9 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 12 5 7 | -2 +1 -3 | 101 41 | 28% 41% 19% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
140 87 | 12 5 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -6 +1 | 74 40 | 11% 11% 12% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
246 191 | 18 6 12 | / 13 6 7 / | 5 2 3 | +5 0 +5 | 163 125 | 37% 58% 31% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
244 173 | 18 6 12 | / 13 6 7 / | 4 3 1 | +5 0 +5 | 145 101 | 23% 9% 31% | 2 0 2 | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
223 128 | 16 8 8 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 3 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 135 80 | 16% 15% 17% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
199 136 | 14 6 8 | / 8 2 6 / | 9 5 4 | +6 +4 +2 | 130 84 | 23% 29% 19% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
161 95 | 11 5 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | 105 60 | 11% 17% 7% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
284 62 | 20 17 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 2 1 1 | +6 +9 -3 | 193 28 | 12% 14% 0% | 4 1 3 | 2 0 2 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
202 130 | 11 4 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -6 +1 | 135 80 | 18% 29% 13% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
189 86 | 12 8 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 0 5 | -4 -1 -3 | 131 56 | 26% 29% 24% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
156 69 | 10 5 5 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 3 0 | -7 -6 -1 | 97 39 | 13% 15% 10% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
133 92 | 10 3 7 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -5 +1 | 147 64 | 32% 22% 38% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
331 204 | 22 11 11 | / 14 6 8 / | 11 3 8 | +8 +5 +3 | 204 128 | 24% 33% 19% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
197 145 | 13 4 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 4 2 2 | -4 -3 -1 | 130 89 | 35% 33% 36% | 3 0 3 | 2 2 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |||
|
195 118 | 15 6 9 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | 120 69 | 21% 18% 22% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
176 98 | 10 4 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 175 122 | 17% 20% 15% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
140 111 | 9 2 7 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 0 5 | -7 -5 -2 | 102 80 | 30% 40% 28% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
325 129 | 21 12 9 | / 14 10 4 / | 3 2 1 | +7 +2 +5 | 196 71 | 31% 33% 27% | 5 3 2 | 5 1 4 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
306 101 | 24 16 8 | / 9 4 5 / | 11 8 3 | +15 +12 +3 | 153 35 | 34% 45% 10% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
194 70 | 15 10 5 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 2 1 | +1 +2 -1 | 100 31 | 19% 11% 57% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
146 70 | 8 4 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 3 6 | -7 -5 -2 | 100 44 | 20% 11% 33% | 0 0 0 | 5 1 4 | -5 -1 -4 | |||
|
138 79 | 10 4 6 | / 17 11 6 / | 8 5 3 | -7 -7 0 | 96 48 | 26% 22% 30% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
Rimuru_T [#10]but u almost predicted everything wrong :/
Actually I did yesterday I was 0-4(because I changed my 100T vs Sen pred from 2-1 100T to 2-0 Sen for that reason) I think Imma do the same here maybe.
xdee1234 [#8]3-0 tsm maybe 3-1 if they play like theyve been playing the last few matches
Tf u on about? TSM have been sweeping everyone, they’re on a hot streak, 100t gotta watch out.
C9fansarecucks [#6]Dicey was like a roblox player or some shit idk
i suspect he was from CS since he was in immortals
HeatAR [#15]Tf u on about? TSM have been sweeping everyone, they’re on a hot streak, 100t gotta watch out.
True, really can't say about anything. But at least NA scene is more predictable than the EU scene out there.
hekzy [#19]i suspect he was from CS since he was in immortals
Apparently he's from Krunker(might be a joke) and TFT
HeatAR [#15]Tf u on about? TSM have been sweeping everyone, they’re on a hot streak, 100t gotta watch out.
thats literally why i said 3-0 maybe 3-1
C9fansarecucks [#6]Dicey was like a roblox player or some shit idk
He played a little black squad but idk if that even has an active competitive scene
I mean TSM completely threw in that thrifty at 11-7, they could have won but kudos 100T in a map where they are not comfortable at all they knew all the TSM tendencies and played it so well
That round though completely fucked TSM, they would have 13-7 it easily but lost to some ghosts
Also steel with the confidence of fucking boomer, all the peeks and ground he took as a KILLJOY was insane
C9fansarecucks [#42]He wasn't dominating but had some great impactful rounds, even without kills, those two smokes in the B split to isolate hazed won them OT, and he held B great with knives and allowed his team to rotate
Agreed. He's not fragging but he is clutching important rounds.
hekzy [#33]bruh
pls send me a clip or sth <3
JcStani is also from Krunker. I found him. Go to 3:14 and look at the player names
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUdxW3KLzX8
JcStani appears multiple times in this video.
I wasn't able to find Dicey, but he is definitely from Krunker as well.
Wealth_and_Taste [#45]JcStani is also from Krunker. I found him. Go to 3:14 and look at the player names
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUdxW3KLzX8
JcStani appears multiple times in this video.
I wasn't able to find Dicey, but he is definitely from Krunker as well.
oh wow, im not gonna kinkshame but....
this is hella cringe xd
wmzgod [#51]just imagine if TSM can't take a map in bo5
very sad for my darling team :(
welp so much for that pred
raka_gg [#50]-culter +GoDazed IGL
-hazed +any random young fragger
= TSM top 3 world
Do nothing = TSM top 2 NA...
Why would they make roster changes when they've always been top 2 in NA? Also why would they drop cutler for a worse player? And do you realize that hazed and cutler play such a big role in helping and setting up Wardell, Drone and Subroza? Adding more fraggers and taking away support role players would only hurt their team that has been so good for so long. Bad take.
raka_gg [#35]TSM wins SPLIT
TSM wins BIND
100T wins ASCENT
TSM wins HAVEN
DAMN BRO
"#35 raka_gg
TSM wins SPLIT
TSM wins BIND
100T wins ASCENT
TSM wins HAVEN
posted 3 hours ago"
Renvas [#61]DAMN BRO
"#35 raka_gg
TSM wins SPLIT
TSM wins BIND
100T wins ASCENT
TSM wins HAVENposted 3 hours ago"
wait
I meant losses
RED_DIESEL [#9]100T deeper map pool... 100T will take this 3-2. mark my words
i hoped you marked my words, sorry for overestimating tsm
Rimuru_T [#10]but u almost predicted everything wrong :/
Call me the comeback predictor of the year. 0-4 on predictions yesterday but 2-0 today :)
lxndrLEET [#84]why they run 3 duelists lmao
NA is so puggy. As soon as TSM ran into an actually coordinated team they folded.
xdee1234 [#87]its crazy to think that if tsm won against eco when they were up 11-7 on split and one of the pistols on bind it would have been a 3-0 in their favor
It's even crazier to think that if my father was a refrigerator, I wouldn't be so damn hot. But we all know reality begs to differ.
That's all I can say to your biiiiig-big 'what if' leap :)
SKiZ0vlr [#95]It's even crazier to think that if my father was a refrigerator, I wouldn't be so damn hot. But we all know reality begs to differ.
That's all I can say to your biiiiig-big 'what if' leap :)
its really not that big if tsm won those 2 round they would have won the series so its way too early to say 100t is the best team in NA
xdee1234 [#96]its really not that big if tsm won those 2 round they would have won the series so its way too early to say 100t is the best team in NA
I'd love to hear your thought process on this.
WarlordPeanut [#97]I'd love to hear your thought process on this.
its really not that hard to understand - if tsm wins against the eco on split, they go up 12-7 and its very unlikely that they lose from there. tsm lost bind 13-11 so if they win a pistol they probably win bind. and these are just specific situations, in this series tsm won 1 out of 7 pistols and 100t won 7 of their 9 eco rounds so if tsm wins a few more pistols and a few more anti ecos they probably win the series
xdee1234 [#98]its really not that hard to understand - if tsm wins against the eco on split, they go up 12-7 and its very unlikely that they lose from there. tsm lost bind 13-11 so if they win a pistol they probably win bind. and these are just specific situations, in this series tsm won 1 out of 7 pistols and 100t won 7 of their 9 eco rounds so if tsm wins a few more pistols and a few more anti ecos they probably win the series
def gotta also consider that they lost a lot of situations where they had man advantage too. far too many times they lost a clutch scenario
jayy [#100]def gotta also consider that they lost a lot of situations where they had man advantage too. far too many times they lost a clutch scenario
yea tsm needs to work on these things if they want to win. they played so sloppy yesterday im surprised the first 2 maps were that close
xdee1234 [#98]its really not that hard to understand - if tsm wins against the eco on split, they go up 12-7 and its very unlikely that they lose from there. tsm lost bind 13-11 so if they win a pistol they probably win bind. and these are just specific situations, in this series tsm won 1 out of 7 pistols and 100t won 7 of their 9 eco rounds so if tsm wins a few more pistols and a few more anti ecos they probably win the series
Yeah you keep saying if 100T didn't win all these situations they weren't supposed to they would've lost but that's what makes 100T the best team in NA; they win the rounds they're not supposed to.