I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
Misc updates
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.93 1.15 0.86 | 161 134 171 | 8 2 6 | / 13 2 11 / | 4 1 3 | -5 0 -5 | 69% 75% 67% | 106 70 119 | 26% 29% 26% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.86 0.17 1.09 | 171 13 225 | 7 0 7 | / 13 3 10 / | 5 1 4 | -6 -3 -3 | 50% 50% 50% | 125 7 165 | 16% 0% 17% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.71 1.88 0.32 | 197 434 119 | 11 7 4 | / 15 3 12 / | 3 1 2 | -4 +4 -8 | 50% 100% 33% | 110 212 76 | 19% 15% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.38 0.60 0.30 | 98 126 90 | 6 2 4 | / 14 4 10 / | 1 0 1 | -8 -2 -6 | 38% 50% 33% | 58 68 54 | 50% 67% 44% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.19 0.19 0.19 | 83 65 89 | 3 1 2 | / 14 3 11 / | 2 0 2 | -11 -2 -9 | 38% 25% 42% | 66 48 72 | 21% 20% 21% | 0 0 0 | 5 1 4 | -5 -1 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 1.59 1.29 | 321 356 216 | 18 14 4 | / 9 7 2 / | 5 5 0 | +9 +7 +2 | 81% 83% 75% | 214 246 119 | 22% 24% 13% | 5 5 0 | 2 2 0 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.49 1.66 0.99 | 229 242 194 | 13 11 2 | / 5 2 3 / | 2 1 1 | +8 +9 -1 | 81% 92% 50% | 156 160 144 | 33% 31% 43% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.40 1.60 0.81 | 196 219 130 | 14 12 2 | / 5 3 2 / | 6 6 0 | +9 +9 0 | 100% 100% 100% | 101 113 64 | 18% 17% 25% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.25 1.43 0.70 | 177 218 55 | 11 10 1 | / 6 4 2 / | 6 4 2 | +5 +6 -1 | 81% 83% 75% | 125 151 50 | 27% 27% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.16 0.99 1.66 | 240 193 382 | 13 8 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 9 7 2 | +3 +1 +2 | 88% 92% 75% | 158 122 266 | 26% 23% 31% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.64 1.22 0.98 | 179 127 219 | 25 6 19 | / 30 13 17 / | 10 3 7 | -5 -7 +2 | 68% 72% 65% | 121 90 142 | 15% 9% 18% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.83 0.88 | 193 243 203 | 31 14 17 | / 34 15 19 / | 11 2 9 | -3 -1 -2 | 61% 61% 62% | 147 160 138 | 25% 26% 25% | 6 3 3 | 9 5 4 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
1.07 0.74 0.88 | 180 183 170 | 28 14 14 | / 33 12 21 / | 13 2 11 | -5 +2 -7 | 59% 61% 58% | 106 104 107 | 19% 18% 19% | 3 1 2 | 5 0 5 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.78 0.88 0.84 | 163 148 174 | 24 9 15 | / 32 13 19 / | 12 6 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 75% 67% 81% | 107 90 118 | 26% 35% 23% | 3 2 1 | 5 3 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.68 0.91 0.81 | 142 130 178 | 26 10 16 | / 28 12 16 / | 3 0 3 | -2 -2 0 | 55% 39% 65% | 108 91 119 | 33% 36% 32% | 2 1 1 | 7 2 5 | -5 -1 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.55 1.35 | 296 300 273 | 44 25 19 | / 29 20 9 / | 9 6 3 | +15 +5 +10 | 70% 69% 72% | 185 195 170 | 22% 26% 15% | 9 8 1 | 7 5 2 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
1.24 0.89 1.09 | 186 189 176 | 31 20 11 | / 27 14 13 / | 12 10 2 | +4 +6 -2 | 75% 77% 72% | 107 106 109 | 15% 19% 10% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.75 1.52 1.07 | 235 165 334 | 32 13 19 | / 32 20 12 / | 16 12 4 | 0 -7 +7 | 82% 85% 78% | 167 111 248 | 20% 17% 22% | 7 3 4 | 1 1 0 | +6 +2 +4 | |
|
1.31 0.69 1.05 | 153 204 66 | 24 21 3 | / 21 12 9 / | 13 8 5 | +3 +9 -6 | 68% 69% 67% | 103 135 56 | 21% 21% 20% | 4 4 0 | 2 1 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
0.86 1.01 0.92 | 179 166 163 | 26 15 11 | / 25 15 10 / | 7 3 4 | +1 0 +1 | 66% 62% 72% | 109 107 112 | 21% 23% 18% | 5 2 3 | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.06 1.29 | 288 277 299 | 25 12 13 | / 20 11 9 / | 10 2 8 | +5 +1 +4 | 75% 64% 86% | 198 186 210 | 22% 23% 22% | 6 3 3 | 5 3 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.17 0.82 1.53 | 201 149 255 | 23 9 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 1 0 1 | +9 0 +9 | 64% 43% 86% | 132 104 160 | 39% 40% 38% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.05 0.77 1.33 | 186 160 214 | 18 6 12 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 2 3 | +1 -4 +5 | 79% 79% 79% | 119 114 123 | 14% 10% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.83 1.11 | 163 112 214 | 17 7 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 10 1 9 | -1 -2 +1 | 64% 50% 79% | 104 74 134 | 18% 21% 17% | 3 1 2 | 3 0 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.67 0.89 | 164 152 177 | 16 7 9 | / 19 11 8 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -4 +1 | 79% 64% 93% | 107 95 118 | 26% 38% 19% | 1 1 0 | 4 3 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 0.90 1.62 | 270 251 290 | 26 11 15 | / 20 13 7 / | 4 1 3 | +6 -2 +8 | 64% 57% 71% | 168 152 185 | 21% 29% 16% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.55 1.48 | 230 141 321 | 19 5 14 | / 22 13 9 / | 7 5 2 | -3 -8 +5 | 79% 79% 79% | 173 102 243 | 16% 12% 19% | 5 2 3 | 1 1 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.94 1.20 0.68 | 129 191 69 | 13 11 2 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 4 3 | -2 +3 -5 | 61% 57% 64% | 90 122 58 | 16% 14% 20% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.93 0.91 | 176 164 189 | 17 8 9 | / 22 11 11 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -3 -2 | 61% 57% 64% | 111 100 121 | 13% 21% 9% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.60 0.18 1.02 | 128 102 154 | 13 4 9 | / 20 13 7 / | 5 2 3 | -7 -9 +2 | 57% 36% 79% | 82 62 102 | 10% 7% 12% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 |
Fire737 [#5]C9 destroy lg so 100T can qualify
Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Can you explain ?
So lg has already qualified?
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
Actually your wrong
Lg loss here is beneficial for 100T
Kep1er22b [#7]Not going to happen sadly :( lg won the head to head so even if 100t gets the last 2 wins, lg would qualify ahead
its based off round differential so if LG get stomped, their diff is gonna get fucked making it slightly possible 100t qual over them
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#1]I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
exactly. mitch diff swift 2-0
plas [#10]its based off round differential so if LG get stomped, their diff is gonna get fucked making it slightly possible 100t qual over them
thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
Fire737 [#9]Actually your wrong
Lg loss here is beneficial for 100T
nope, because they'll both end at 2 wins
LG won the head on head vs 100t
LG will qualify over 100t
Kep1er22b [#17]thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
With this stupid logic lg has already qualified
Fire737 [#19]With this stupid logic lg has already qualified
well yea :| it'd be kinda stupid if it went by rounds instead of head to heads
Delusional_Mitch_Fan [#1]I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH I HECKIN LOVE MITCH
Diffy in the Mitchy C9 2-0
LoganThePredictor [#24]Will any of the matches left in the group stage be played on the new patch?
the final week
Kep1er22b [#17]thats not what vanity or tarik said lmao
even if lg loses the rest and 100t win the rest
lg beat 100t in a head on head, making lg qualify over 100t
100T can qualify if they beat XSET
vanityxz [#21]#LGLoyal 2-0
THE MOOSE IS LOOSE
can u ask ur team to stop shitting on lg please?
oh, you already did?
Lets go map 2 and 3 is in the bag.
Kep1er22b [#18]nope, because they'll both end at 2 wins
LG won the head on head vs 100tLG will qualify over 100t
It goes by rounds. So if 100T gets 2-3 and they have a better W/L by rounds played they advance. The 13-0 really hurt them. But I don’t think I’ve ever seen a tournament format that tracks round spread go off a head to head. Because then the event would be considered over by now. There’s no way they’re going to continue to play games that don’t even matter