Envy 2-1
Misc updates
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.05 1.07 1.03 | 190 195 187 | 16 7 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 8 6 2 | +1 0 +1 | 74% 91% 58% | 141 137 145 | 39% 37% 42% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.01 1.24 0.81 | 214 247 184 | 18 10 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 9 5 4 | +1 +3 -2 | 83% 82% 83% | 135 149 122 | 22% 31% 14% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.00 0.87 1.11 | 207 163 247 | 17 7 10 | / 16 7 9 / | 3 0 3 | +1 0 +1 | 61% 55% 67% | 137 102 169 | 21% 20% 21% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.98 1.41 0.58 | 219 297 149 | 18 12 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 2 1 1 | 0 +4 -4 | 78% 91% 67% | 142 177 110 | 22% 21% 22% | 6 4 2 | 1 0 1 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.66 1.03 | 202 180 223 | 16 7 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 3 4 | -1 -1 0 | 70% 45% 92% | 129 107 150 | 18% 13% 23% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.38 1.38 | 264 234 298 | 20 10 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 6 3 3 | +4 +2 +2 | 74% 75% 73% | 188 185 191 | 47% 41% 52% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.04 0.78 1.32 | 226 213 242 | 16 8 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 4 0 | -1 -2 +1 | 70% 83% 55% | 152 131 175 | 15% 15% 16% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.01 1.80 0.15 | 210 308 103 | 16 14 2 | / 16 6 10 / | 11 7 4 | 0 +8 -8 | 78% 92% 64% | 142 185 96 | 35% 45% 18% | 0 0 0 | 4 0 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.95 0.47 1.48 | 194 97 300 | 16 4 12 | / 19 10 9 / | 6 3 3 | -3 -6 +3 | 65% 58% 73% | 133 77 195 | 29% 12% 42% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.83 1.21 0.42 | 176 241 106 | 15 10 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 3 0 | -2 +2 -4 | 57% 75% 36% | 109 154 61 | 17% 15% 20% | 3 3 0 | 3 1 2 | 0 +2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.95 1.28 1.12 | 218 191 248 | 55 25 30 | / 46 23 23 / | 8 2 6 | +9 +2 +7 | 62% 60% 65% | 141 119 164 | 25% 24% 26% | 13 6 7 | 14 7 7 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.15 0.79 0.97 | 209 236 181 | 50 29 21 | / 53 26 27 / | 19 12 7 | -3 +3 -6 | 74% 77% 71% | 132 145 119 | 28% 26% 31% | 9 5 4 | 9 6 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.92 0.98 0.95 | 211 198 224 | 49 24 25 | / 54 27 27 / | 27 14 13 | -5 -3 -2 | 74% 74% 74% | 126 109 144 | 24% 33% 19% | 6 3 3 | 5 2 3 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.98 0.90 0.94 | 159 183 136 | 36 21 15 | / 45 24 21 / | 27 12 15 | -9 -3 -6 | 72% 74% 71% | 118 128 108 | 26% 29% 22% | 2 2 0 | 3 0 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.58 0.82 0.70 | 159 147 177 | 38 18 20 | / 49 25 24 / | 11 4 7 | -11 -7 -4 | 59% 49% 71% | 112 109 116 | 20% 18% 21% | 2 0 2 | 6 4 2 | -4 -4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.42 1.25 1.33 | 276 291 261 | 65 35 30 | / 47 23 24 / | 24 12 12 | +18 +12 +6 | 80% 82% 77% | 184 186 182 | 26% 28% 25% | 11 7 4 | 5 4 1 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.08 1.38 1.23 | 199 169 230 | 47 20 27 | / 38 20 18 / | 17 8 9 | +9 0 +9 | 81% 76% 86% | 137 120 154 | 37% 33% 40% | 6 4 2 | 4 1 3 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
1.36 0.73 1.04 | 184 237 134 | 44 29 15 | / 44 20 24 / | 30 16 14 | 0 +9 -9 | 75% 82% 69% | 123 153 95 | 39% 40% 38% | 2 0 2 | 5 0 5 | -3 0 -3 | |
|
0.86 0.97 0.92 | 189 173 207 | 47 20 27 | / 48 23 25 / | 9 7 2 | -1 -3 +2 | 64% 68% 60% | 118 108 128 | 20% 18% 22% | 14 6 8 | 9 5 4 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
0.68 1.07 0.88 | 183 149 216 | 43 17 26 | / 51 26 25 / | 16 8 8 | -8 -9 +1 | 70% 71% 69% | 134 116 151 | 26% 22% 29% | 4 1 3 | 9 6 3 | -5 -5 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 1.37 1.40 | 254 273 235 | 23 12 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 0 0 0 | +10 +5 +5 | 71% 75% 67% | 149 166 133 | 19% 15% 27% | 7 3 4 | 3 2 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.98 1.17 0.79 | 157 222 92 | 12 10 2 | / 15 8 7 / | 10 1 9 | -3 +2 -5 | 79% 75% 83% | 110 139 82 | 23% 32% 8% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.91 0.56 1.25 | 206 161 252 | 18 7 11 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 0 3 | +2 -2 +4 | 67% 50% 83% | 144 127 161 | 25% 38% 21% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.87 0.57 1.16 | 195 132 258 | 15 4 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 13 7 6 | -3 -5 +2 | 79% 67% 92% | 123 88 157 | 36% 36% 36% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.84 0.69 1.00 | 198 140 256 | 15 5 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 11 6 5 | -4 -4 0 | 67% 67% 67% | 118 75 160 | 20% 35% 14% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.65 1.01 | 270 313 227 | 22 14 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 4 6 | +5 +6 -1 | 83% 75% 92% | 175 201 149 | 29% 33% 24% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.14 0.71 1.57 | 171 108 236 | 14 4 10 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 3 2 | +1 -4 +5 | 79% 75% 83% | 112 59 164 | 19% 22% 18% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.90 0.86 0.93 | 177 196 160 | 15 8 7 | / 18 10 8 / | 9 4 5 | -3 -2 -1 | 75% 83% 67% | 126 147 106 | 31% 28% 35% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.68 1.11 | 192 134 252 | 16 6 10 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 2 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 67% 58% 75% | 119 82 156 | 16% 14% 18% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.83 0.69 0.98 | 160 181 140 | 14 7 7 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | 71% 83% 58% | 112 135 89 | 34% 33% 36% | 3 1 2 | 6 4 2 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.08 1.49 0.59 | 213 285 129 | 17 13 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 4 0 | 0 +4 -4 | 64% 75% 50% | 133 174 85 | 29% 26% 40% | 2 0 2 | 4 4 0 | -2 -4 +2 | |
|
1.00 0.86 1.16 | 221 211 233 | 16 9 7 | / 18 11 7 / | 7 3 4 | -2 -2 0 | 73% 75% 70% | 127 107 151 | 33% 33% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.94 0.61 1.34 | 193 134 264 | 15 6 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -3 +1 | 55% 50% 60% | 136 87 195 | 34% 41% 30% | 4 2 2 | 8 4 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.79 0.71 0.89 | 129 132 126 | 8 4 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 5 4 | -7 -5 -2 | 64% 58% 70% | 103 107 97 | 18% 18% 19% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.32 0.53 0.07 | 70 103 31 | 4 4 0 | / 16 8 8 / | 1 1 0 | -12 -4 -8 | 41% 50% 30% | 60 92 22 | 12% 12% 13% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.65 1.92 1.42 | 333 359 312 | 27 13 14 | / 13 5 8 / | 10 4 6 | +14 +8 +6 | 86% 90% 83% | 226 233 220 | 34% 37% 33% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.23 1.44 1.06 | 166 201 138 | 13 7 6 | / 10 4 6 / | 10 5 5 | +3 +3 0 | 73% 70% 75% | 100 122 83 | 65% 58% 73% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.18 1.15 1.20 | 162 164 162 | 13 6 7 | / 9 4 5 / | 6 2 4 | +4 +2 +2 | 91% 80% 100% | 113 116 110 | 41% 29% 58% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.03 0.65 1.34 | 200 137 254 | 16 4 12 | / 13 6 7 / | 2 2 0 | +3 -2 +5 | 68% 70% 67% | 125 83 160 | 28% 26% 29% | 6 2 4 | 3 3 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
0.86 0.93 0.80 | 195 172 215 | 13 6 7 | / 15 6 9 / | 7 2 5 | -2 0 -2 | 73% 70% 75% | 158 140 172 | 21% 20% 21% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
S0v4k [#4]Envy 2-1 unless Shanks unleashes the beast
why do you talk about Envy in OpTic vs Rise match?
RFLGBS [#23]why do you talk about Envy in OpTic vs Rise match?
Optic merged with envy. So the optic team is the old envy lineup
Opinion:
Rise will lose 1-2 to Optic. Its because Rise so inconsistent with their games. Remember, they took Ls in the First Qualifier, when it mattered most to qualify. Optic's only known choke was at champions, but they have one of the consistent duelists in yay. Would pick yay over Shanks ez. But Rise can have the suprise factor, so it could go either ways, but still voting for Optic 2-1 Rise
Netero [#25]):
Im going thru the rankings and I'm like who's this new Optic Gaming? It's NV lmao. Same thing with Victor (former "food) I was like "no not my boy food"
SENBobstar [#34]Im going thru the rankings and I'm like who's this new Optic Gaming? It's NV lmao. Same thing with Victor (former "food) I was like "no not my boy food"
wait whattttttttttttttttttttttt
wow good catch, nobody else knew about that
swEEsh2M [#50]If yay doesnβt perform, Rise can actually win this
But thatβs the thing thoβ¦he will.
SENBobstar [#34]Im going thru the rankings and I'm like who's this new Optic Gaming? It's NV lmao. Same thing with Victor (former "food) I was like "no not my boy food"
WHAT. STOP LYING. VICTOR<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<FOOD SMH
jtayyy [#64]why did OpTic pick up the entire Envy roster except food?? I feel like he could have been the difference maker on bind
Food = victor he just changed nickname
jtayyy [#64]why did OpTic pick up the entire Envy roster except food?? I feel like he could have been the difference maker on bind
Victor is food...
pewpew [#70]Karma, get Chet out of NV and everything will work out. This Chet guy hasn't done nothing. In fact, a team becomes better when he leaves. (NRG, TSM, and now OpTic suffering the consequences of having him as a coach).
I mean, TSM has been his most succesful team, bit i agree with you, Chet is just not it.
VetrezZ [#85]Next time
Congrats, but it's just online valorant. Optic clears them in a meaningful game
jajajaja [#99]im a yay fan, but after all those comments he made regarding other teams, and now optic's the one choking, kinda bad for him
i'm curious, what did he say generally?
unknown_trash [#104]did no one have faith in rise? ik they did bad in qualifiers but this team looked so strong last year.
its not about having faith in rise, its about favoring the obvious team, nv/optic got #2 on berlin
u trash
raka [#95]Congrats, but it's just online valorant. Optic clears them in a meaningful game
Who's the clown now?
juno_VLR [#62]imagine if wardell could bottom frag on chamber and his team actually carry him to a win for once. that's the issue with tsm.
yeah, sadge to watch tsm now, hope they bounced back brother
pewpew [#70]Karma, get Chet out of NV and everything will work out. This Chet guy hasn't done nothing. In fact, a team becomes better when he leaves. (NRG, TSM, and now OpTic suffering the consequences of having him as a coach).
yeah, i remember back when he coached tsm, he shit talking valorant and compare it a lot to csgo, i mean, i know if you're good in csgo, but still, you have to put in the work if you migrate to a new game imo
unknown_trash [#104]did no one have faith in rise? ik they did bad in qualifiers but this team looked so strong last year.
yeah i agree, can't just throw any team out of the equation
jajajaja [#105]its not about having faith in rise, its about favoring the obvious team, nv/optic got #2 on berlin
u trash
comparing 3 months ago to now? L take+ratio
i mean i was also thinking of rise last year but the recency bias was very strong here