5 of the 10 players with the highest hs% in the event are brazilian.
best aimers in the region?
all aimers no brainers?
ARix145 [#2]That means literally nothing
Well last na team EG won champs when nobody was even close to their firepower.Now na teams don't have that fear factor.
Ronyko23 [#5]Well last na team EG won champs when nobody was even close to their firepower.Now na teams don't have that fear factor.
na players have no talent like in cs
Ronyko23 [#4]NA aim fell off. All teams are just smoke spamming & not taking duels unless two 3 peeking together.Playing older drx util heavy meta. its a shooting game goddammit.Now even drx is just going with firepower.
yeah. and NA players typically use phantoms to spam smokes, and vandal increases overall hs%
ARix145 [#2]That means literally nothing
if you think so... the truth is that if br/latam players had brains, the region would be dominated by them... i mean, look at aspas
foythvlr [#9]all aimers no brainers?
pretty much yeah
2G and furia are just that (just saw the stats 4 of the top 10 are from those teams lol)
Mibr i'il give a shot because they havent developed much of their strats yet
Loud historically is the only one who gets out of this
2g was definitely NOT all aimers no brainers when they won ascencion.
Veri [#10]2g was definitely NOT all aimers no brainers when they won ascencion.
meaning on kickoff. 2G ascension run was pretty much the best BR team besides loud (and that 2 week timeframe where furia and mibr were leading americas in 23)
Ronyko23 [#5]Well last na team EG won champs when nobody was even close to their firepower.Now na teams don't have that fear factor.
EG won champs because they played perfect, tactically sound valorant. Aim was definitely a factor like enabling demon1, but it wasn't the reason they won.
Yistyy [#13]This stat is pointless. Hs% doesn't account for spam and awping, and having a higher hs% definitely doesn't make you a better player.
It's only a detriment when it's like FNS levels of bad like consistently under 15%.
ok. let's analyze some statistics from the same tournament:
all players with a rating of 1.0 or higher got AT LEAST 20% hs rate (except stellar, who only played 38 rounds).
the other 6 players who finished the tournament with an hs% of less than 20% had a rating of less than 1.0. do you think this is a coincidence?
1ski [#14]ok. let's analyze some statistics from the same tournament:
all players with a rating of 1.0 or higher got AT LEAST 20% hs rate (except stellar, who only played 38 rounds).
the other 6 players who finished the tournament with an hs% of less than 20% had a rating of less than 1.0. do you think this is a coincidence?
Yeah it's a coincidence.
1ski [#14]ok. let's analyze some statistics from the same tournament:
all players with a rating of 1.0 or higher got AT LEAST 20% hs rate (except stellar, who only played 38 rounds).
the other 6 players who finished the tournament with an hs% of less than 20% had a rating of less than 1.0. do you think this is a coincidence?
thats the most basic level of extrapolation. the people in the bottom of americas stats kickoff have many 40% headshots percenters. in fact the lowest rated players have higher headshot percentages