Amer>=emea>CN>pcfc
overall region strength (EMEA=AMER)
AMERICAS was literally only OPTIC (1st, 3rd, 2nd) and LOUD (2nd, 11th-12th, 1st) and there were no other even decent teams other than XSET (who looked horrendous in Copenhagen and got 5th-6th in Champs)
EMEA had FPX (won a trophy), FNATIC (6th best team of the year), TL (9th best team of the year), M3C (best game of all time against FNC in 2022 Stage 1), GUILD (wouldve won Champions if they couldve gotten Twisten as a sub in LCQ and also was the 3rd best performing team at Copenhagen), ACEND, G2(EU)(got 5th-6th in Reykjavik)
however since AMERICAS had the best 2 teams, EMEA=AMER
PAC???? bro did you watch Champs 2024 or nah.
China??? literally did nothing the whole year until EDG won champs
btw EMEA had better avg placement at Shanghai than Pacific (1 team region)
EMEA 5.0 : PAC 5.66
EMEA was the overall 2nd best region and you are objectively an idiot if you disagree. This is no place for biases.
ok so you wont listen to me huh.
alright listen to the pros then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBOI6WjHVKM&t=2295s
overall region strength. otherwise, I wouldve done 2023 as EMEA>AMER>PAC>CN instead of AMER>EMEA>PAC>CN.
there were no other GOOD teams in AMERICAS until Xset got 5th-6th in Champs (btw XSET looked HORRENDOUS at Copenhagen)
for the whole year, EMEA had 5-6 good teams (FPX, FNC, TL, GUILD, G2, M3C) and for half the year, FPX was better than OPTIC and LOUD. Again, FNS literally said FPX was better than them during Reykjavik and I can find you the clip if you want me to.