Logo Tier List IMO
H3ENnZ [#2]This must be biased how is TEC NOVA and M8 in D when boring ah FPX and NAVI are in S
TEC is trying to look cool but looks like shit
NOVA is doing too much and is not clean at all
M8 logo is just bad
Also NAVI has a very clean logo which is super recognizable and has great colors, FPX is so clean for being a word logo which I usually do not like.
localkoolkid [#7]TEC is trying to look cool but looks like shit
NOVA is doing too much and is not clean at all
M8 logo is just bad
Also NAVI has a very clean logo which is super recognizable and has great colors, FPX is so clean for being a word logo which I usually do not like.
I guess i have different standards than you but thats cool
Liwus [#5]The coloured backgrounds ruined this
I just thought some of them looked rlly nice ngl, Idk what the guy making the list was thinking with some of them tho
(Repost from saebr's thread)
https://i.imgur.com/uPLcFi7.png
S+: just a great logo all-round, no changes necessary
S: it's a great logo when you consider the branding, familiarity, and identity
S-: it's a decent logo but what makes it good is how unique it is
A: it's alright, it works well enough, it stands out and people can recognize it
B: old versions or other options or alterations are better but it has enough reputation to work anyway
C: it's pretty bad but at the same time recognizable and therefore fulfills the role of a logo
D: not a fan of the logo or branding or overall look
E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
F: please rebrand immediately (or at least make a new logo)
Individual tiers aren't in order.
You could make an argument for some of them to be placed elsewhere, but this is what I've got
Also, just a note: for KRU I'm assuming they're using the new logo, the one that's been in use since the start of franchising
Oh yeah also TEC was meant to be in D
New 2G logo would go in B
cloudberry [#16](Repost from saebr's thread)
https://i.imgur.com/uPLcFi7.png
S+: just a great logo all-round, no changes necessary
S: it's a great logo when you consider the branding, familiarity, and identity
S-: it's a decent logo but what makes it good is how unique it is
A: it's alright, it works well enough, it stands out and people can recognize it
B: old versions or other options or alterations are better but it has enough reputation to work anyway
C: it's pretty bad but at the same time recognizable and therefore fulfills the role of a logo
D: not a fan of the logo or branding or overall look
E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
F: please rebrand immediately (or at least make a new logo)Individual tiers aren't in order.
You could make an argument for some of them to be placed elsewhere, but this is what I've got
Also, just a note: for KRU I'm assuming they're using the new logo, the one that's been in use since the start of franchising
Oh yeah also TEC was meant to be in D
New 2G logo would go in B
can see/agree with most of these (excluding the drastically differing ones but that is just personal)
But idk if this is unpopular but I fw the old 2G logo way more then the new one
cloudberry [#16](Repost from saebr's thread)
https://i.imgur.com/uPLcFi7.png
S+: just a great logo all-round, no changes necessary
S: it's a great logo when you consider the branding, familiarity, and identity
S-: it's a decent logo but what makes it good is how unique it is
A: it's alright, it works well enough, it stands out and people can recognize it
B: old versions or other options or alterations are better but it has enough reputation to work anyway
C: it's pretty bad but at the same time recognizable and therefore fulfills the role of a logo
D: not a fan of the logo or branding or overall look
E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
F: please rebrand immediately (or at least make a new logo)Individual tiers aren't in order.
You could make an argument for some of them to be placed elsewhere, but this is what I've got
Also, just a note: for KRU I'm assuming they're using the new logo, the one that's been in use since the start of franchising
Oh yeah also TEC was meant to be in D
New 2G logo would go in B
Furia criminally underrated
localkoolkid [#18]can see/agree with most of these (excluding the drastically differing ones but that is just personal)
But idk if this is unpopular but I fw the old 2G logo way more then the new one
That's why I put it in B... because the current one is alright but an older version was better
Liwus [#19]Furia criminally underrated
E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
I'm rating these logos on whether I think they're good esports logos or not. Don't get me wrong, I love FURIA's panther, but it's so much better as a sports logo than an esports one
cloudberry [#21]E: doesn't look like an esports logo (doesn't necessarily mean the logo is bad, just looks out of place, like more of a football club or a website or something)
I'm rating these logos on whether I think they're good esports logos or not. Don't get me wrong, I love FURIA's panther, but it's so much better as a sports logo than an esports one
I disagree but its is your list afterall :)
localkoolkid [#7]TEC is trying to look cool but looks like shit
NOVA is doing too much and is not clean at all
M8 logo is just bad
Also NAVI has a very clean logo which is super recognizable and has great colors, FPX is so clean for being a word logo which I usually do not like.
What about the new M8 logo
localkoolkid [#13]Just has 0 aura
based off you saying 0 aura then T1 should be in S no? The org defo has the most aura out of all of these orgs
Discord