?
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 0.86 1.35 | 239 197 303 | 18 8 10 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 90% 83% 100% | 158 140 185 | 40% 41% 40% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.87 1.12 0.49 | 162 197 109 | 12 9 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 55% 50% 63% | 101 118 76 | 26% 30% 18% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.74 0.80 0.65 | 167 187 137 | 11 8 3 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -1 -4 | 50% 50% 50% | 114 127 95 | 34% 47% 20% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.57 0.43 0.79 | 154 148 164 | 9 5 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 2 3 | -8 -6 -2 | 60% 58% 63% | 110 109 112 | 35% 41% 29% | 2 2 0 | 5 4 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.50 0.55 0.41 | 154 150 160 | 10 6 4 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 2 1 | -9 -5 -4 | 60% 75% 38% | 106 92 126 | 43% 38% 50% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.11 1.57 | 353 311 382 | 24 9 15 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 1 3 | +9 +2 +7 | 80% 75% 83% | 197 179 209 | 22% 32% 18% | 10 5 5 | 4 2 2 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
1.37 0.79 1.75 | 216 97 296 | 17 3 14 | / 10 5 5 / | 5 2 3 | +7 -2 +9 | 85% 88% 83% | 148 74 197 | 32% 27% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.08 0.71 1.33 | 188 89 255 | 13 3 10 | / 10 4 6 / | 8 3 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 80% 88% 75% | 117 75 145 | 33% 22% 38% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.08 1.65 0.70 | 186 253 142 | 14 7 7 | / 13 4 9 / | 9 7 2 | +1 +3 -2 | 65% 88% 50% | 128 166 104 | 31% 30% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.96 1.71 0.45 | 164 301 73 | 13 10 3 | / 12 4 8 / | 7 5 2 | +1 +6 -5 | 80% 100% 67% | 90 169 38 | 38% 44% 25% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.86 1.35 1.06 | 239 197 303 | 18 8 10 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | +3 -2 +5 | 90% 83% 100% | 158 140 185 | 40% 41% 40% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.12 0.49 0.87 | 162 197 109 | 12 9 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | 55% 50% 63% | 101 118 76 | 26% 30% 18% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.80 0.65 0.74 | 167 187 137 | 11 8 3 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -1 -4 | 50% 50% 50% | 114 127 95 | 34% 47% 20% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.43 0.79 0.57 | 154 148 164 | 9 5 4 | / 17 11 6 / | 5 2 3 | -8 -6 -2 | 60% 58% 63% | 110 109 112 | 35% 41% 29% | 2 2 0 | 5 4 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.55 0.41 0.50 | 154 150 160 | 10 6 4 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 2 1 | -9 -5 -4 | 60% 75% 38% | 106 92 126 | 43% 38% 50% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.11 1.57 1.38 | 353 311 382 | 24 9 15 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 1 3 | +9 +2 +7 | 80% 75% 83% | 197 179 209 | 22% 32% 18% | 10 5 5 | 4 2 2 | +6 +3 +3 | |
|
0.79 1.75 1.37 | 216 97 296 | 17 3 14 | / 10 5 5 / | 5 2 3 | +7 -2 +9 | 85% 88% 83% | 148 74 197 | 32% 27% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.71 1.33 1.08 | 188 89 255 | 13 3 10 | / 10 4 6 / | 8 3 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 80% 88% 75% | 117 75 145 | 33% 22% 38% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.65 0.70 1.08 | 186 253 142 | 14 7 7 | / 13 4 9 / | 9 7 2 | +1 +3 -2 | 65% 88% 50% | 128 166 104 | 31% 30% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.71 0.45 0.96 | 164 301 73 | 13 10 3 | / 12 4 8 / | 7 5 2 | +1 +6 -5 | 80% 100% 67% | 90 169 38 | 38% 44% 25% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
Maybe this is a hint to put tex back on Sentinel and Demon1 on Jett. nataNk stays on aggressive Initiator, C0M on Sova / 2nd Ini / 2nd Controller (Flex) and kiNgg obviously stays on Viper and IGL. It felt so much like tex being used to the slower Sentinel playstyle now that a switch back to duelist is maybe a bit crazy, while you have with Demon1 one of the best Jett players.