0

this is dumb

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
FDWC-

https://liquipedia.net/valorant/VCT/2024/Championship_Points/Pacific

getting 2nd in madrid = 0 VCT points & getting 1st in shanghai = 3 VCT points

how does that make any sense 💀

#2
Hynix
1
Frags
+

franchising formats have all been retarded

#3
cloudberry
3
Frags
+

Because when you place 2nd, you don't win the tournament? I'm sorry, I don't understand the confusion here

#4
Hidero_
2
Frags
+

Im actually happy that the international events dont award alot of point to all the teams there. Cause then your gonna get the same problem that last year had of having the same teams at both the international events and it will just feel like a repeat.

#5
FDWC-
4
Frags
+
cloudberry [#3]

Because when you place 2nd, you don't win the tournament? I'm sorry, I don't understand the confusion here

2nd & 3rd placed in masters not getting any VCT points is fucking r*tardation

1st = 5 VCT Points
2nd = 3 VCT Points
3rd = 1 VCT Points

^ should be like this or something

cause there's no way you're not being rewarded for being consistent at the international stage

#6
ButterflyEffect23
3
Frags
+
cloudberry [#3]

Because when you place 2nd, you don't win the tournament? I'm sorry, I don't understand the confusion here

zero points for the second place at Masters is kinda bad

#7
cloudberry
0
Frags
+
FDWC- [#5]

2nd & 3rd placed in masters not getting any VCT points is fucking r*tardation

1st = 5 VCT Points
2nd = 3 VCT Points
3rd = 1 VCT Points

^ should be like this or something

cause there's no way you're not being rewarded for being consistent at the international stage

Oh you're just complaining, I thought you actually didn't know, mb

#8
Hynix
2
Frags
+
cloudberry [#3]

Because when you place 2nd, you don't win the tournament? I'm sorry, I don't understand the confusion here

there was no confusion? i'm confused at your confusion.
he's pointing out the fact that getting second at an international event doesn't help a team with qualifying through champs points despite the purpose of these points being for consistent teams to get through.
i think more than that though the issue is that winning a regional awards the same number of points as winning a masters.

#9
Hynix
0
Frags
+
Hidero_ [#4]

Im actually happy that the international events dont award alot of point to all the teams there. Cause then your gonna get the same problem that last year had of having the same teams at both the international events and it will just feel like a repeat.

lacking a value in consistency can lead to shit teams like T1 qualifying through a once in a lifetime series

#10
FDWC-
0
Frags
+
cloudberry [#7]

Oh you're just complaining, I thought you actually didn't know, mb

yes im just complaining how shit the format is

#11
Hidero_
0
Frags
+
Hynix [#9]

lacking a value in consistency can lead to shit teams like T1 qualifying through a once in a lifetime series

T1 qualifying had nothing to do with the international event itself. That was completely the poor formatting of the domestic leagues which is a whole different conversation to be had (dont worry, its shit, i agree)

#12
FDWC-
0
Frags
+
ButterflyEffect23 [#6]

zero points for the second place at Masters is kinda bad

RIOT so dumb istg

#13
jdzin77
0
Frags
+

j

#14
strawwwwws
0
Frags
+

why should a team get awarded for an event they didn’t win

#15
FDWC-
1
Frags
+
strawwwwws [#14]

why should a team get awarded for an event they didn’t win

???????????????????????

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment