Champions format

Champions Seoul will have the same format as the previous ones.

Could have changed it

I actually liked Swiss instead of regular old group stage.

rito

#MVGA #MAKEVLRGREATAGAIN

CS uses Swiss system and its great imo

bruh y do we have the systems switched. u should b using swiss when u have more teams and groups when u have less.

moshimoshiman24 [#3]

bruh y do we have the systems switched. u should b using swiss when u have more teams and groups when u have less.

blame rito

#MVGA #MAKEVLRGREATAGAIN

Leo Faria the best thing that came out of Brazil! Vamo

Wait really? thats boring.
I found this format to be so good, they have so much more potential with the team picking thing too

Aayan [#6]

Wait really? thats boring.
I found this format to be so good, they have so much more potential with the team picking thing too

Leo explained that while it may not be as exciting, they rather keep Champs the way it is, so teams know beforehand who they are facing in the first matches, so they can better prepare (anti strat). Because it is the greatest valorant tourney, the best team should win it, and not knowing who you are facing after a win/loss hinders that

Liwus [#7]

Leo explained that while it may not be as exciting, they rather keep Champs the way it is, so teams know beforehand who they are facing in the first matches, so they can better prepare (anti strat). Because it is the greatest valorant tourney, the best team should win it, and not knowing who you are facing after a win/loss hinders that

yo leo cooked on that response

GSL is not as fun as swiss imo.
20 games vs 33 games (if we are assuming it follows a 3W/3L system), which logistically could be an issue.
Also gsl is probably more likely to allow for every region to have atleast 1 team in the playoffs, seeding creates a bigger advantage in gsl.