(no order within each category)
1-5: LEV, FUT, DRX, PRX, GENG
6-10: SEN, NAVI, TH, BBL, TS
11-15: 100T, KRU, NRG, VIT, KC
16-20: G2, C9, EG, M8, FNC
21-25: LOUD, TL, GX, RRQ, TLN
25-33: FURIA, MIBR, KOI, ZETA, T1, GE, BLD, DFM
Qyllic [#7]TS and KRU should be switched but solid list nonetheless
ts literally beat prx in a 2-0...
I'm a Kru believer but they haven't beat any top tier teams yet to prove they belong higher
Siigma777 [#9]ts literally beat prx in a 2-0...
I'm a Kru believer but they haven't beat any top tier teams yet to prove they belong higher
Using ur logic, neither has Gen.G, in fact they lost to both of Pacific top teams but I bet my soul that everyone would be complaining if they were in KRU's place. KRU been looking solid bruh, it's not like he is putting KRU top 10 itw either.
sentinelmain377 [#11]w00t just came this week bro
woot has played a grand total of one game in franchising. tell me how they are a top 5 team itw from one win? holy eu brain
AlexSMTxx [#14]Using ur logic, neither has Gen.G, in fact they lost to both of Pacific top teams but I bet my soul that everyone would be complaining if they were in KRU's place. KRU been looking solid bruh, it's not like he is putting KRU top 10 itw either.
i agree kru should be higher but that analogy is so bad man did we forget what geng accomplished a few weeks ago lol
ASTEROIDCHILD [#19]i agree kru should be higher but that analogy is so bad man did we forget what geng accomplished a few weeks ago lol
This ain't madrid anymore my guy. Or are u gonna tell me current LOUD is the same one that classified to Madrid. Or that SEN that lost to EG a few days ago is the same one that won Masters. Teams change their level, you can't judge their current form based off of performances from previous tournaments. If a team plays like shit, I ain't gonna put them over other team that played substantially better just because they played well a month ago lol. At that point you are rating teams based on what they once were, and not what they currently are.
AlexSMTxx [#21]This ain't madrid anymore my guy. Or are u gonna tell me current LOUD is the same one that classified to Madrid. Or that SEN that lost to EG a few days ago is the same one that won Masters. Teams change their level, you can't judge their current form based off of performances from previous tournaments. If a team plays like shit, I ain't gonna put them over other team that played substantially better just because they played well a month ago lol. At that point you are rating teams based on what they once were, and not what they currently are.
current loud? shit maybe lol, they were chinese farmers at madrid and lost to every other good team remember
geng are a total rebuild team with a rookie player that reached gfs in their first event together. sure form is temporary but you have to give them some respect based on that achievement alone
ASTEROIDCHILD [#3]geng out of top 5 is dirty work. 2nd at madrid and only reg season losses have been 2-1 to prx and drx
i expect a fix asap
who cares about madrid? loud was top 4 and look where they are now. clearly that tournament was fraudulent so theres no point in rating a team off that event
ASTEROIDCHILD [#22]current loud? shit maybe lol, they were chinese farmers at madrid and lost to every other good team remember
geng are a total rebuild team with a rookie player that reached gfs in their first event together. sure form is temporary but you have to give them some respect based on that achievement alone
The LOUD that beat SEN and LEV to qualify to Madrid isn't the same one that is shitting the bed going 0 - 3 bro... You don't need to be a genius to see that they are playing substantially worse rn. But you do you
dort [#23]who cares about madrid? loud was top 4 and look where they are now. clearly that tournament was fraudulent so theres no point in rating a team off that event
So one team falling off after an event = fraud event???
Average NRG fan take
AlexSMTxx [#24]The LOUD that beat SEN and LEV to qualify to Madrid isn't the same one that is shitting the bed going 0 - 3 bro... You don't need to be a genius to see that they are playing substantially worse rn. But you do you
i just dont want you disrespecting a team that achieved so much in so little time by using some of the worst examples xd
there are better ways of making a point but idrc in the end
doomvor [#26]So one team falling off after an event = fraud event???
Average NRG fan take
over half the teams who qualified are getting raw dogged in their region rn. clearly that event was fraudulent
dort [#29]over half the teams who qualified are getting raw dogged in their region rn. clearly that event was fraudulent
Which?
doomvor [#30]Which?
kc, sen, th, loud, and geng (geng wins were against shit teams, got exposed by prx & drx)
ASTEROIDCHILD [#28]i just dont want you disrespecting a team that achieved so much in so little time by using some of the worst examples xd
there are better ways of making a point but idrc in the end
I see what ur trying to get at, but the problem with ur argument is that it's solely based on hopium. Literally. You putting your money on them getting back to their old form, and yes, it's possible they do go back to it, but it's also possible they don't. I respect what they achieved, but your argument relies on just believing in them coming back, while mine is based off of recent results. We've seen many examples of teams being unable to go back to their prime form for your type of argument to be reliable.
AlexSMTxx [#34]I see what ur trying to get at, but the problem with ur argument is that it's solely based on hopium. Literally. You putting your money on them getting back to their old form, and yes, it's possible they do go back to it, but it's also possible they don't. I respect what they achieved, but your argument relies on just believing in them coming back, while mine is based off of recent results. We've seen many examples of teams being unable to go back to their prime form for your type of argument to be reliable.
the problem with your argument is pure false equivalency
geng have not shown a dramatic falloff on the level of sen and loud so idk why you posture as if they have. there's nothing to have hopium about, they look fine. they don't have to "redeem themselves" like sen or loud, any of geng prx drx could beat each other on the day
honest to god if they got upset by zeta or something i would agree
ASTEROIDCHILD [#35]the problem with your argument is pure false equivalency
geng have not shown a dramatic falloff on the level of sen and loud so idk why you posture as if they have. there's nothing to have hopium about, they look fine. they don't have to "redeem themselves" like sen or loud, any of geng prx drx could beat each other on the day
honest to god if they got upset by zeta or something i would agree
That I agree, though they don't look as good they still look solid, unlike SEN and LOUD. In the end my entire point wasn't to say that Gen.G are shit lol, but to prove that teams can fall off/improve and shouldn't be ranked based on how they played like in the past.
dort [#33]kc, sen, th, loud, and geng (geng wins were against shit teams, got exposed by prx & drx)
2-1 = exposed???
Sen has no reason to try, they basically already have their champs spot locked up(also no prac)
How are TH and KC bad now?
Loud fair enough, but again no prac