Where did it go wrong for Emea

#58

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

ARE U SPED????

THE 5th APAC TEAM DIDNT EVEN MAKE THE EVENT (COUNT THAT IN THE AVERAGE PLACEMENT YOU FKN RETARD)

#61

Zerphyr1

Frags

–

Yes it is true that it's slightly unfair that I included the top 5 emea teams but not top 5 apacs but that's because it's impossible without making either emeas or apacs average biased.

It's like if you invite all of the 10 emea teams to champs 2023 but keep the same amount of apac and americas teams.

Emea would have an even greater chance of getting into the top 4 for example but their average placement would be lower. I'm sure you can see how if u exclude emeas worst performing team in the event it messes up the data.

#62

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

then include 4 EMEA and 4 APAC???
dont include the 5th if APAC doesnt have a 5th team at the event as well

now dont say APAC > EMEA in 2023
EMEA was better than APAC in 2023

#66

Zerphyr1

Frags

–

Excluding EMEA's worst-performing team would skew the data in favor of EMEA, as they would have a higher chance of achieving better average placements with fewer teams.

#69

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

obviously

but then consider that EMEA and APAC both have 5 teams, and that APAC's 5th best team is worse than ZETA (4th best team)
APAC will again have a lower placement

#72

Zerphyr1

Frags

–

that is true but you are just speculating and I think you forgot that I believe emea was better in 2023 but my whole argument about all this is that apac is better if you exclude prx and fnc.

and so I would consider emea a one team region

#74

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

even excluding FNC and PRX

the whole combined EMEA from 2nd-10th is better than APAC 2nd-10th

#75

Zerphyr1

Frags

–

your just speculating but I agree.

remember my point is that emea was a one team region in 2023.
Even though EMEAs worst teams is most likely better than apacs worst teams, my point still stands

#76

sentinelmain377

Frags

–

proving that takes too long