X10 2-0 no hope all in x10 ez
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X10
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
1 (0)
|
2 (2)
|
15 (10)
|
GXR
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
2 (1)
|
5 (2)
|
11 (4)
|
(BANK)
X10
GXR
(BANK)
|
1
0.1k
0.4k
|
2
9.6k
$$
0.9k
|
3
0.5k
$$$
$$
12.4k
|
4
9.8k
$$$
$$$
1.3k
|
5
15.6k
$$$
$
6.8k
|
6
26.5k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
|
7
13.0k
$$$
$$$
12.5k
|
8
19.6k
$$$
$$$
1.6k
|
9
27.2k
$$$
$$
6.5k
|
10
36.3k
$$$
$$$
1.1k
|
11
21.0k
$$$
$$$
4.7k
|
12
14.5k
$$$
$$
0.8k
|
(BANK)
X10
GXR
(BANK)
|
13
0.1k
0.4k
|
14
3.0k
$$
9.0k
|
15
12.1k
$$
$$$
0.7k
|
16
13.7k
$$$
$
7.2k
|
17
5.0k
$$$
$$$
4.2k
|
18
12.1k
$$$
$$
0.8k
|
19
3.8k
$$$
$$$
3.7k
|
20
9.8k
$
$$$
6.6k
|
21
5.3k
$$$
$$$
14.7k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X10
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
1 (0)
|
2 (2)
|
15 (10)
|
GXR
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
2 (1)
|
5 (2)
|
11 (4)
|
It still doesn't justify the usage of that cam tho, I mean like Giants case, it was not included as a known exploit in the EU rulebook first, but they still got penelized later. Despite this, X10 still chose to do so. They can't just claim it was absent in the SEA rulebook and not expect consequences
Alright. First of all, it's tournament organizers. Not production. They're completely separate entities under one umbrella. Second of all, it might be true if this was Challengers Philippines as they have the higher authority to decide besides the Riot global rules. But no, it's the SEA Challengers Playoffs which while managed and organized by PPGL, it is in conjunction with Riot and their global rules as it is the overarching entity.