FS 2-0 TLN
completed
... 54 more matches
Friday, November 24th
7:35 AM EST
Patch 7.10
FS ban Split; TLN ban Sunset; FS pick Lotus; TLN pick Breeze; FS ban Bind; TLN ban Ascent; Haven remains
Betting
$100 on
FULL SENSE
returned
$205 at 2.05 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
10
FULL SENSE
7 /
3
Lotus
PICK
1:08:22
TALON
5 /
8
13
FS 
TLN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.31 0.60 1.95 | 297 168 417 | 24 6 18 | / 19 10 9 / | 2 0 2 | +5 -4 +9 | 78% 73% 83% | 178 112 240 | 23% 10% 30% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.98 0.92 | 177 201 155 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 10 5 5 | -4 -2 -2 | 78% 64% 92% | 108 122 96 | 16% 15% 17% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.85 0.71 | 192 215 172 | 13 7 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 3 1 2 | -6 -2 -4 | 57% 55% 58% | 141 155 129 | 30% 33% 26% | 2 1 1 | 5 3 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.44 0.97 | 145 107 181 | 12 4 8 | / 17 9 8 / | 0 0 0 | -5 -5 0 | 57% 64% 50% | 99 69 127 | 25% 17% 29% | 0 0 0 | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 | |
|
0.37 0.30 0.43 | 87 101 74 | 7 4 3 | / 19 10 9 / | 2 2 0 | -12 -6 -6 | 52% 55% 50% | 70 86 56 | 29% 33% 25% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.57 1.14 2.03 | 262 221 307 | 24 11 13 | / 13 9 4 / | 6 2 4 | +11 +2 +9 | 74% 58% 91% | 178 142 216 | 43% 36% 50% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
1.20 0.95 1.47 | 223 169 282 | 18 7 11 | / 14 8 6 / | 17 9 8 | +4 -1 +5 | 78% 83% 73% | 131 115 149 | 23% 26% 21% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
1.07 0.69 1.49 | 254 197 319 | 20 7 13 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 2 1 | +4 -2 +6 | 87% 75% 100% | 152 126 180 | 12% 14% 10% | 9 6 3 | 2 2 0 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
|
1.05 1.24 0.84 | 152 196 106 | 14 10 4 | / 12 7 5 / | 5 1 4 | +2 +3 -1 | 78% 75% 82% | 104 133 73 | 33% 28% 50% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.85 0.79 0.91 | 195 230 158 | 16 10 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | 70% 67% 73% | 134 155 110 | 40% 50% 30% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.87 1.79 1.31 | 288 229 354 | 74 33 41 | / 51 28 23 / | 9 1 8 | +23 +5 +18 | 73% 65% 82% | 178 135 227 | 23% 22% 24% | 17 10 7 | 13 9 4 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
0.95 1.13 1.03 | 181 176 191 | 47 23 24 | / 47 26 21 / | 24 15 9 | 0 -3 +3 | 76% 68% 85% | 122 119 124 | 26% 29% 24% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.84 1.10 0.96 | 202 188 213 | 51 25 26 | / 46 24 22 / | 3 2 1 | +5 +1 +4 | 69% 73% 64% | 130 120 142 | 23% 21% 25% | 4 1 3 | 10 3 7 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
1.09 0.81 0.96 | 189 223 153 | 42 26 16 | / 52 28 24 / | 29 17 12 | -10 -2 -8 | 69% 73% 64% | 128 150 102 | 25% 29% 20% | 6 3 3 | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.57 0.81 0.68 | 148 151 134 | 33 20 13 | / 50 28 22 / | 19 7 12 | -17 -8 -9 | 64% 59% 70% | 101 107 95 | 26% 28% 23% | 3 2 1 | 9 4 5 | -6 -2 -4 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.92 1.45 1.20 | 224 188 257 | 57 23 34 | / 48 25 23 / | 21 11 10 | +9 -2 +11 | 77% 70% 84% | 150 118 179 | 30% 33% 29% | 8 2 6 | 3 2 1 | +5 0 +5 | |
|
|
0.99 1.02 1.01 | 206 233 183 | 51 28 23 | / 49 25 24 / | 9 3 6 | +2 +3 -1 | 71% 73% 70% | 149 165 135 | 33% 37% 29% | 5 4 1 | 4 1 3 | +1 +3 -2 | |
|
|
1.09 0.85 0.96 | 171 185 170 | 48 26 22 | / 47 23 24 / | 16 5 11 | +1 +3 -2 | 70% 67% 73% | 117 128 108 | 34% 29% 42% | 4 3 1 | 5 1 4 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
|
0.82 1.08 0.95 | 190 174 201 | 43 18 25 | / 50 25 25 / | 30 15 15 | -7 -7 0 | 76% 76% 76% | 118 114 121 | 21% 20% 21% | 5 1 4 | 5 2 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.54 1.10 0.84 | 201 167 235 | 46 17 29 | / 53 26 27 / | 15 9 6 | -7 -9 +2 | 71% 76% 68% | 130 119 140 | 17% 16% 18% | 18 9 9 | 12 8 4 | +6 +1 +5 |
13
FULL SENSE
8 /
5
Breeze
PICK
42:32
TALON
4 /
2
6
FS
TLN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.36 1.10 1.82 | 286 264 327 | 22 13 9 | / 12 8 4 / | 2 0 2 | +10 +5 +5 | 79% 67% 100% | 165 146 198 | 47% 50% 42% | 6 3 3 | 3 3 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
|
1.27 1.09 1.56 | 250 231 284 | 18 11 7 | / 10 6 4 / | 3 2 1 | +8 +5 +3 | 84% 83% 86% | 171 154 201 | 28% 21% 41% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
1.21 1.15 1.33 | 222 250 176 | 16 11 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 3 1 2 | +6 +4 +2 | 84% 83% 86% | 148 160 128 | 27% 29% 23% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.94 0.85 1.11 | 168 156 190 | 13 7 6 | / 12 8 4 / | 6 6 0 | +1 -1 +2 | 89% 83% 100% | 118 114 125 | 31% 35% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.83 0.93 0.65 | 184 185 185 | 11 7 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 6 3 | -4 -2 -2 | 79% 75% 86% | 129 132 124 | 21% 33% 10% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.15 0.83 1.34 | 208 156 239 | 14 4 10 | / 15 6 9 / | 3 1 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 63% 71% 58% | 150 116 171 | 27% 36% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.93 0.56 1.14 | 185 214 168 | 11 4 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 2 5 | -4 -3 -1 | 74% 71% 75% | 116 140 102 | 28% 20% 33% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.86 0.50 1.07 | 205 130 250 | 13 3 10 | / 18 7 11 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 79% 86% 75% | 134 65 174 | 24% 25% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.66 1.39 0.23 | 145 260 79 | 11 8 3 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 1 2 | -3 +2 -5 | 58% 57% 58% | 96 162 57 | 27% 31% 20% | 1 1 0 | 4 0 4 | -3 +1 -4 | |
|
|
0.55 0.11 0.80 | 158 116 183 | 10 2 8 | / 18 7 11 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -5 -3 | 47% 57% 42% | 104 87 113 | 36% 25% 46% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 |
15
FULL SENSE
5 /
7
/ 3
Haven
1:00:39
TALON
7 /
5
/ 1
13
FS
TLN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
FS
TLN
25
26
27
28
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.27 0.90 1.63 | 280 247 315 | 28 14 14 | / 20 10 10 / | 5 1 4 | +8 +4 +4 | 64% 57% 71% | 187 143 230 | 15% 16% 14% | 7 5 2 | 8 5 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
1.20 1.42 0.97 | 191 263 120 | 18 12 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 17 10 7 | 0 +2 -2 | 71% 86% 57% | 116 163 68 | 24% 24% 23% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
1.16 1.00 1.32 | 197 174 222 | 20 9 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 4 4 | +3 0 +3 | 64% 57% 71% | 135 121 148 | 32% 39% 27% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.96 0.93 0.98 | 210 215 206 | 21 10 11 | / 19 9 10 / | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | 68% 71% 64% | 128 131 124 | 19% 23% 16% | 3 0 3 | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.58 0.28 0.87 | 134 105 164 | 10 5 5 | / 21 11 10 / | 14 4 10 | -11 -6 -5 | 61% 43% 79% | 95 78 112 | 22% 21% 22% | 2 1 1 | 5 2 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.13 0.94 1.32 | 206 190 224 | 20 9 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 9 6 3 | +3 0 +3 | 79% 71% 86% | 139 123 154 | 24% 32% 19% | 4 1 3 | 1 0 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
|
1.10 0.81 1.39 | 217 137 298 | 23 8 15 | / 21 10 11 / | 8 3 5 | +2 -2 +4 | 71% 64% 79% | 143 107 179 | 39% 29% 47% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
1.04 1.23 0.84 | 214 273 156 | 21 14 7 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 1 3 | +2 +4 -2 | 79% 79% 79% | 161 198 124 | 32% 31% 33% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
|
0.85 0.63 1.06 | 190 168 213 | 16 8 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 10 6 4 | -3 -2 -1 | 75% 86% 64% | 130 128 133 | 15% 14% 16% | 5 2 3 | 5 3 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
|
0.77 0.83 0.71 | 161 158 165 | 14 7 7 | / 21 10 11 / | 6 4 2 | -7 -3 -4 | 75% 71% 79% | 108 100 116 | 15% 14% 15% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
The question of whether red is "better" than orange is subjective and largely depends on the context and personal preferences. Both red and orange are colors with unique characteristics and associations, and what might be considered "better" could vary based on individual tastes, cultural influences, and specific applications. Here are some aspects to consider:
Cultural Associations: Different cultures may ascribe different meanings to colors. In some cultures, red may be associated with luck, passion, or danger, while orange could be linked to warmth, energy, or creativity. The perceived superiority of one color over the other could depend on the cultural context.
Psychological Impact: Colors can have psychological effects on individuals. Red is often associated with strong emotions such as love, excitement, or intensity. It can also stimulate appetite. Orange, on the other hand, is often associated with warmth and enthusiasm. The psychological impact of a color can influence preferences based on the emotions and feelings it evokes.
Aesthetic Preferences: Aesthetic preferences are highly subjective. Some people may simply prefer the visual appeal of red over orange, or vice versa. Aesthetic choices often depend on personal taste and the specific context in which the colors are used.
Functional Considerations: In certain contexts, one color may be more suitable than the other based on functional considerations. For example, in traffic signals, red is typically used to indicate "stop" due to its strong visibility and association with danger. In other applications, such as branding or design, the choice between red and orange may depend on the desired impact or message.
In conclusion, whether red is "better" than orange is subjective and context-dependent. Both colors have their own unique characteristics and can be preferred in different situations based on cultural, psychological, aesthetic, and functional considerations. It's essential to understand the specific context and purpose when making judgments about the superiority of one color over another.
Discord