The analysts in this game are so freaking bad bro, t1 loses badly against edg in tokyo, and fut put a fight against drx that is the second best pacific team, idk what they are smoking to do their "analysis"
they're looking at how T1 got so close to win against NRG. means NRG is also overrated
not how it works lol. NRG went on to get fourth, beating the same team that beat FUT. this logic doesn't work
They are just biased as hell, they can be good
Why would they say this in the first place?
It's legit 3rd seed vs 3rd seed from both regions.
why in the fuck would they pick pearl man. this worries man as they going to get 13-0ed in haven
lmao im pretty sure most people got fut in their pickems including me
The betting odds were also in favor of FUT, it was at least 50/50 and analysts said "Quick 2-0 for T1, no chance for FUT". I dont know how.
They showed twitter votes, it was like 65% for T1 against 35% for FUT
Where is botviatan?
asian bias
They lowkey thought FUT is a weak team
Masters Tokyo was their first international experience and couldn't quite show their true potential because of it
Meanwhile NA analysts 🫵😂
Anti-EMEA bias, it's strong on VLR as well
Unfortunately true. EMEA was always on top, these frauds cannot accept this.
Come back to this comment when t1 makes the greatest comeback possible and take pearl #copium
mb
Lol
when 'analysts' were good in esports? i mean these are just people who talking shit to fill pauses between the games, who takes them serious?
favourite is valid given the tape but heavy favourite is just ???
Not favourites, it's 50 50 maybe even FUT 60 40 because they play in a better region
sure i would say 50 50 but i can see the argument for t1 being favoured
its map 1 calma