NRG Esports vs. VIRTUOSO | Champions Tour North America Stage 3: Challengers 1 | Open Qualifier | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
wedid NRG	1.15 0.84 1.44	190 145 232	15 5 10	/ 13 7 6 /	6 2 4	+2 -2 +4	74% 64% 83%	110 68 150	36% 31% 38%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
eeiu NRG	1.09 1.02 1.15	206 170 241	18 7 11	/ 16 7 9 /	4 2 2	+2 0 +2	70% 73% 67%	129 105 151	20% 29% 14%	1 1 0	2 0 2	-1 +1 -2
ANDROID NRG	0.78 0.62 0.92	178 140 214	14 6 8	/ 16 7 9 /	4 0 4	-2 -1 -1	52% 55% 50%	100 47 150	32% 19% 36%	2 1 1	3 2 1	-1 -1 0
tex NRG	0.77 0.59 0.95	196 202 192	14 7 7	/ 17 10 7 /	4 1 3	-3 -3 0	70% 55% 83%	126 134 119	24% 29% 14%	1 0 1	5 2 3	-4 -2 -2
s0m NRG	0.67 1.08 0.29	177 225 133	13 8 5	/ 18 8 10 /	3 1 2	-5 0 -5	61% 82% 42%	115 148 85	33% 24% 47%	3 2 1	4 2 2	-1 0 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Lin VRT	1.43 1.54 1.32	256 272 239	20 11 9	/ 13 8 5 /	6 3 3	+7 +3 +4	74% 75% 73%	170 202 136	33% 40% 28%	7 5 2	0 0 0	+7 +5 +2
snxper VRT	1.35 1.10 1.62	209 166 258	20 8 12	/ 12 7 5 /	5 3 2	+8 +1 +7	70% 75% 64%	105 96 115	21% 31% 13%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1
Eley VRT	0.94 0.84 1.03	154 165 142	12 7 5	/ 15 8 7 /	14 4 10	-3 -1 -2	65% 67% 64%	119 142 94	19% 22% 13%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
Apoth VRT	0.89 1.08 0.68	183 196 170	14 8 6	/ 17 9 8 /	7 4 3	-3 -1 -2	65% 75% 55%	112 133 89	43% 50% 35%	3 1 2	3 0 3	0 +1 -1
iKoniK VRT	0.80 0.83 0.78	184 177 193	14 7 7	/ 17 9 8 /	6 3 3	-3 -2 -1	74% 75% 73%	118 115 121	14% 10% 20%	3 2 1	2 1 1	+1 +1 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
wedid NRG	1.09 1.18 1.13	203 190 217	32 17 15	/ 29 16 13 /	9 3 6	+3 +1 +2	75% 74% 76%	129 107 153	31% 23% 40%	2 1 1	3 1 2	-1 0 -1
eeiu NRG	1.06 0.75 0.91	201 222 180	31 17 14	/ 34 17 17 /	10 5 5	-3 0 -3	59% 65% 52%	132 149 114	23% 32% 11%	1 1 0	3 0 3	-2 +1 -3
ANDROID NRG	0.73 1.03 0.88	196 148 247	28 12 16	/ 34 17 17 /	8 3 5	-6 -5 -1	57% 57% 57%	119 81 161	27% 21% 30%	2 1 1	5 4 1	-3 -3 0
tex NRG	0.65 1.00 0.82	185 179 193	27 13 14	/ 36 20 16 /	8 4 4	-9 -7 -2	66% 52% 81%	123 122 124	27% 28% 25%	7 3 4	9 6 3	-2 -3 +1
s0m NRG	0.85 0.35 0.61	165 197 131	23 14 9	/ 35 18 17 /	9 5 4	-12 -4 -8	61% 74% 48%	107 133 79	25% 26% 24%	4 3 1	8 3 5	-4 0 -4

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Lin VRT	1.60 1.00 1.28	235 287 190	38 22 16	/ 25 12 13 /	9 4 5	+13 +10 +3	77% 76% 78%	147 183 114	23% 26% 20%	10 7 3	0 0 0	+10 +7 +3
snxper VRT	1.09 1.39 1.25	215 170 257	35 13 22	/ 24 12 12 /	14 6 8	+11 +1 +10	77% 76% 78%	126 99 150	25% 31% 22%	4 2 2	4 2 2	0 0 0
Apoth VRT	1.24 0.83 1.03	214 238 190	33 19 14	/ 30 15 15 /	13 7 6	+3 +4 -1	73% 81% 65%	126 145 109	42% 48% 35%	5 2 3	6 2 4	-1 0 -1
iKoniK VRT	0.85 1.07 0.96	234 215 248	35 14 21	/ 33 17 16 /	10 6 4	+2 -3 +5	80% 76% 83%	130 118 142	14% 11% 16%	6 3 3	2 1 1	+4 +2 +2
Eley VRT	0.84 1.05 0.95	166 150 180	27 12 15	/ 29 13 16 /	17 5 12	-2 -1 -1	64% 71% 57%	118 118 118	21% 26% 18%	3 0 3	4 2 2	-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
wedid NRG	1.11 1.32 0.82	216 231 198	17 12 5	/ 16 9 7 /	3 1 2	+1 +3 -2	76% 83% 67%	149 143 157	28% 19% 42%	0 0 0	3 1 2	-3 -1 -2
ANDROID NRG	0.99 0.84 1.18	213 155 291	14 6 8	/ 18 10 8 /	4 3 1	-4 -4 0	62% 58% 67%	139 112 176	21% 22% 21%	0 0 0	2 2 0	-2 -2 0
tex NRG	0.86 0.70 1.07	173 157 196	13 6 7	/ 19 10 9 /	4 3 1	-6 -4 -2	62% 50% 78%	120 111 131	30% 27% 36%	6 3 3	4 4 0	+2 -1 +3
eeiu NRG	0.73 1.10 0.23	196 269 99	13 10 3	/ 18 10 8 /	6 3 3	-5 0 -5	48% 58% 33%	136 189 64	26% 33% 0%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
s0m NRG	0.55 0.64 0.44	152 172 127	10 6 4	/ 17 10 7 /	6 4 2	-7 -4 -3	62% 67% 56%	98 119 71	17% 27% 5%	1 1 0	4 1 3	-3 0 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Apoth VRT	1.18 1.46 0.96	245 295 209	19 11 8	/ 13 6 7 /	6 3 3	+6 +5 +1	81% 89% 75%	142 161 128	41% 46% 35%	2 1 1	3 2 1	-1 -1 0
iKoniK VRT	1.14 0.88 1.33	284 266 298	21 7 14	/ 16 8 8 /	4 3 1	+5 -1 +6	86% 78% 92%	144 121 161	14% 14% 14%	3 1 2	0 0 0	+3 +1 +2
snxper VRT	1.13 1.07 1.18	221 175 256	15 5 10	/ 12 5 7 /	9 3 6	+3 0 +3	86% 78% 92%	148 102 182	29% 31% 28%	3 2 1	2 0 2	+1 +2 -1
Lin VRT	1.12 1.67 0.70	214 307 145	18 11 7	/ 12 4 8 /	3 1 2	+6 +7 -1	81% 78% 83%	121 158 94	15% 18% 12%	3 2 1	0 0 0	+3 +2 +1
Eley VRT	0.96 0.83 1.06	178 130 214	15 5 10	/ 14 5 9 /	3 1 2	+1 0 +1	62% 78% 50%	117 87 139	24% 38% 21%	3 0 3	2 1 1	+1 -1 +2

#1

ThatsAWrap

✔

5

Frags

+

–

#SignVirtuoso

#2

dogegamer

5

Frags

+

–

NRG disband why replace an igl with a not igl

#3

Crayzid

2

Frags

+

–

no shot

#4

plas

0

Frags

+

–

nrg too???? whats happening to all these teams

#5

ToastByToast

0

Frags

+

–

NRG TOO???????

#6

Swiftmal12

0

Frags

+

–

LOL

#7

nabil

✔

1

Frags

+

–

k

#8

SignificantDot

2

Frags

+

–

plas [#4]

nrg too???? whats happening to all these teams

You’re finally seeing just how small the skill gap is between T1 and T2 teams.

#9

chicho5121

1

Frags

+

–

Virtuoso is good so I wouldn't be surprised if they pull it off, but at the same time NRG should still be winning this series

#10

XQOM

2

Frags

+

–

Wtf is happening

#11

supernova

2

Frags

+

–

WTF

#12

BIGGEST_LG_FAN

-10

Frags

+

–

NO WAY WTF NRG YOU FUCKING CLOWNS GGS GGS GGS GGS GO STREAM SOME MORE MORONS

#13

Crayzid

0

Frags

+

–

NRG??????

#14

JSN

3

Frags

+

–

Wedidn't :(

#15

HackNaija

1

Frags

+

–

gg virtuoso too good

#16

resent

-4

Frags

+

–

LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOO NRG ARE SO BAD

#17

turkey

1

Frags

+

–

what the fuck

#18

XQOM

1

Frags

+

–

NO WAY, LETS GO

#19

mattgg2015

0

Frags

+

–

brah

#20

saladpalad

-1

Frags

+

–

NRG has no brain LOL

#21

TSMFTXFAN123

-2

Frags

+

–

WTF???

#22

BIGGEST_LG_FAN

-2

Frags

+

–

nrg dogwater

#23

Dylxn

0

Frags

+

–

???

#24

Elol

0

Frags

+

–

HAHAHHAHA

#25

ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8

0

Frags

+

–

:D

#26

kyieori

1

Frags

+

–

at least wedid played well? looking at the stats it seems like s0m had an off day, the roster is new, they'll get better and they'll be back

#27

Ullyr

0

Frags

+

–

dap diff Sadge

#28

Flamephoenix11

0

Frags

+

–

KEKW

#29

redlight

1

Frags

+

–

What the fuck happened

I had NRG going to challengers finals tf

#30

RRoadRRunneRR

4

Frags

+

–

kyieori [#26]

at least wedid played well? looking at the stats it seems like s0m had an off day, the roster is new, they'll get better and they'll be back

yea, youre right. they have another 100 chances and of course they will be all on fire randomly on one of those days...

#31

ToastByToast

0

Frags

+

–

today is crazy. holy shit

#32

HaSanity

0

Frags

+

–

nrg are so badddddddddddd

#33

SunnyD

1

Frags

+

–

oh ya hate to see it

#34

Ands

0

Frags

+

–

FeelsBadMan

#35

Acount123

-1

Frags

+

–

-s0m

+rebo

Perfect fit

#36

Watson

0

Frags

+

–

no way nrg lost with that roster lmao

#37

cerise

0

Frags

+

–

vrt ran a no duelist comp for ascent... started on attack... and WON. damn.

#38

buntly

3

Frags

+

–

virtuoso just look to have an excellent read on meta (just looking at the stats and comps at least)

#39

k1ng1namo

0

Frags

+

–

looooooooool

#40

InfinityBit

0

Frags

+

–

SignificantDot [#8]

You’re finally seeing just how small the skill gap is between T1 and T2 teams.

i dont understand why people ever thought there was a difference, all the people that came from cs (aside from the players on T1) are all failed pug stars. I never had any high expectations for any of them and I have no idea why anyone did either. A lot of NA teams are people who made a name in pugs, they just shined a little brighter than everyone else, doesnt mean theyre actually better

#41

Alokin

0

Frags

+

–

InfinityBit [#40]

i dont understand why people ever thought there was a difference, all the people that came from cs (aside from the players on T1) are all failed pug stars. I never had any high expectations for any of them and I have no idea why anyone did either. A lot of NA teams are people who made a name in pugs, they just shined a little brighter than everyone else, doesnt mean theyre actually better

so hiko and nitro are pug stars?

#42

LifeIsALie

0

Frags

+

–

Alokin [#41]

so hiko and nitro are pug stars?

only the ones who are inconsistent are those. 100t and sen have a VERY GOOD consistency record and thats only cuz of shahzam , dapr , hiko and nitro

#43

Ryn0

0

Frags

+

–

InfinityBit [#40]

i dont understand why people ever thought there was a difference, all the people that came from cs (aside from the players on T1) are all failed pug stars. I never had any high expectations for any of them and I have no idea why anyone did either. A lot of NA teams are people who made a name in pugs, they just shined a little brighter than everyone else, doesnt mean theyre actually better

It's not CSGO though. A low tier CSGO player could very well be a top tier Valorant player. Most of Sentinels are a good example. If S1mple, Elige or Zywoo came over, they could very well be low tier players. Now Zywoo played one tourney as a step in and he looked good, obviously skills do carry over.

#44

Ryn0

0

Frags

+

–

Ryn0 [#43]

It's not CSGO though. A low tier CSGO player could very well be a top tier Valorant player. Most of Sentinels are a good example. If S1mple, Elige or Zywoo came over, they could very well be low tier players. Now Zywoo played one tourney as a step in and he looked good, obviously skills do carry over.

Overall though, my point is I wouldn't call CSGO an accurate gage for how they will perform in Valorant. At this moment, it's so early that Noone knows who are the very best of the best. On top of that the meta shifts and updates are dramatic compared to CSGO. Kind of like the AWP nerf crippling KennyS, except it happens almost every month.