?
Netero [#7]Isn't that the site where all the psychopaths from twitch went?
yes kick is where all the twitch rejects, racists, and gambling addicts go
ballistA [#10]yes kick is where all the twitch rejects, racists, and gambling addicts go
Yes, XQC is a twitch reject, i forgot.
Netero [#7]Isn't that the site where all the psychopaths from twitch went?
nope. most are still on twitch
Bonkbonk201 [#11]Yes, XQC is a twitch reject, i forgot.
don't worry, he falls under the "gambling addict" and only went on that site because of the giant contract he got
ballistA [#10]yes kick is where all the twitch rejects, racists, and gambling addicts go
Uh where does the chess streamer Hikaru nakamura fall in those three categories?
ballistA [#14]don't worry, he falls under the "gambling addict" and only went on that site because of the giant contract he got
so you are telling me contracts arent a reason why people should pursue a certain avenue?
ballistA [#14]don't worry, he falls under the "gambling addict" and only went on that site because of the giant contract he got
so if it's pokimane or valkyrae or another heavily loved creator on twitch "oh no dw guys it's fine, you'll get through the hard times" but when it's xqc who has a problem he's just another statistic, someone who clearly it's his own fault for preconditioned things that he cannot control, like what the bias is showing clearly.
Bonkbonk201 [#18]so if it's pokimane or valkyrae or another heavily loved creator on twitch "oh no dw guys it's fine, you'll get through the hard times" but when it's xqc who has a problem he's just another statistic, someone who clearly it's his own fault for preconditioned things that he cannot control, like what the bias is showing clearly.
u gotta learn that u don't choose to support someone through issues based off whether u like them or not, u do it because it's the decent fucking thing to do, imagine if someone like adin ross or andrew tate came out saying they struggled with mental health, everyone would use it to shit on them just like they did jordan peterson for crying about his cause, u people need a reality check.
Bonkbonk201 [#19]u gotta learn that u don't choose to support someone through issues based off whether u like them or not, u do it because it's the decent fucking thing to do, imagine if someone like adin ross or andrew tate came out saying they struggled with mental health, everyone would use it to shit on them just like they did jordan peterson for crying about his cause, u people need a reality check.
andrew tate is a sex trafficker...
Hyopic [#20]andrew tate is a sex trafficker...
once again showing the biases, if someone else who was heavily respected was accused of this, no one would use those descriptions until it was 100% proven, but because people dislike tate even without their being proof still people call him these things, u sir are exactly what i was trying to target with this message.
And i will also say, in no way do i actively support andrew tate or adin ross, they are just good case studies for this particular issue.
Bonkbonk201 [#21]once again showing the biases, if someone else who was heavily respected was accused of this, no one would use those descriptions until it was 100% proven, but because people dislike tate even without their being proof still people call him these things, u sir are exactly what i was trying to target with this message.
And i will also say, in no way do i actively support andrew tate or adin ross, they are just good case studies for this particular issue.
the dude quite literally admitted to it through his so called "University" courses and some of his online monologues... you're really delusional and need some help. and no, I won't make fun of you for seeking that psychiatric help
jkjkjk [#22]the dude quite literally admitted to it through his so called "University" courses and some of his online monologues... you're really delusional and need some help. and no, I won't make fun of you for seeking that psychiatric help
As i said, i do not actively support andrew tate or adin ross, it's not hard to read, i just know given it was someone like them, or someone like pokimane or amouranth coming out with it, for some people it'd be a differing reaction, if u already know it's fair to treat everyone equal no matter who they are there's no issue here.
Bonkbonk201 [#21]once again showing the biases, if someone else who was heavily respected was accused of this, no one would use those descriptions until it was 100% proven, but because people dislike tate even without their being proof still people call him these things, u sir are exactly what i was trying to target with this message.
And i will also say, in no way do i actively support andrew tate or adin ross, they are just good case studies for this particular issue.
if someone explicitly said and advertised on their online course they sell that they get girls who had no prior experience in caming, got them to fall in love with tate, bring them to a foreign country where they don't speak the language, get one of your girls to help convince the girl to do it, take their passport and steal their money by pretending they pay higher taxes then they actually do.
Then I would assume the same about them as andrew tate, either a sex trafficker or tate lies in everything he says, with andrews tates history the former seems more likely
Faraday [#24]if someone explicitly said and advertised on their online course they sell that they get girls who had no prior experience in caming, got them to fall in love with tate, bring them to a foreign country where they don't speak the language, get one of your girls to help convince the girl to do it, take their passport and steal their money by pretending they pay higher taxes then they actually do.
Then I would assume the same about them as andrew tate, either a sex trafficker or tate lies in everything he says, with andrews tates history the former seems more likely
U are arguing against me with a point which i agree with, i don't get why you guys arguing what your arguing and acting like this point works against mine, as i said, i do not support andrew tate nor adin ross.
Edit also just realised bro burned so many alts tryna prove a point i agree with actively, rip.
Bonkbonk201 [#23]As i said, i do not actively support andrew tate or adin ross, it's not hard to read, i just know given it was someone like them, or someone like pokimane or amouranth coming out with it, for some people it'd be a differing reaction, if u already know it's fair to treat everyone equal no matter who they are there's no issue here.
There is a difference though, it changes the likelyhood,
if I see a photo of Jeffrey Epstein with his arm around a 15 yr old girl then I think it's fair to assume that girl is being trafficked
but if I see a photo of pokimaine with her arm around a 15 yr old girl it's more likely not a girl being trafficked
Of course in the eyes of the law we shouldn't discriminate against someones history but in the court of public opinion I think it's fair to look if the behaviour lines up with their past
Bonkbonk201 [#21]once again showing the biases, if someone else who was heavily respected was accused of this, no one would use those descriptions until it was 100% proven, but because people dislike tate even without their being proof still people call him these things, u sir are exactly what i was trying to target with this message.
And i will also say, in no way do i actively support andrew tate or adin ross, they are just good case studies for this particular issue.
Without proof? It's as if you are blind and want to pretend as though there isn't any. There's plenty of micro-proofs out there on the internet, including his own confessions to them. Do some research. Some men are just too busy riding another straight man's dick these days. There's no point in contrasting a heavily respected person with a person like Tate because a person's actions creates a preconceived idea in the minds of others, whether they could do it or not. That doesn't equal to proof but in his case, there's way too much evidence towards him doing it because of his big ass mouth. People like you only empower such shit-stains. Grow up.
Bonkbonk201 [#25]U are arguing against me with a point which i agree with, i don't get why you guys arguing what your arguing and acting like this point works against mine, as i said, i do not support andrew tate nor adin ross.
Edit also just realised bro burned so many alts tryna prove a point i agree with actively, rip.
the only alt I have is NotFaradaysAlt which got banned
Faraday [#26]There is a difference though, it changes the likelyhood,
if I see a photo of Jeffrey Epstein with his arm around a 15 yr old girl then I think it's fair to assume that girl is being trafficked
but if I see a photo of pokimaine with her arm around a 15 yr old girl it's more likely not a girl being traffickedOf course in the eyes of the law we shouldn't discriminate against someones history but in the court of public opinion I think it's fair to look if the behaviour lines up with their past
Yeah, that's fair, and the entire point i was trying to make was against what originally happened in this thread, me getting called delusional which normally causes the person attacked to call the other delusional and then the discussion goes nowhere.
Because u were willing to listen we actually ended up learning we actively agree on what u just said right now and that i was just trying to give a different perspective on the issue, which was seen as weird.
I will also add though, i don't care what people think given they think bad of me, because at the end of the day it does not matter to me what other people think, people with enough sense will actively try to communicate their point and have an open ended conversation with me on it.
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer [#16]any fnatic game should be there because its always a harassment
p_n hub isn't for harrassment lol, thats illegal
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer [#16]any fnatic game should be there because its always a harassment
what does blud watch?
Bonkbonk201 [#29]Yeah, that's fair, and the entire point i was trying to make was against what originally happened in this thread, me getting called delusional which normally causes the person attacked to call the other delusional and then the discussion goes nowhere.
Because u were willing to listen we actually ended up learning we actively agree on what u just said right now and that i was just trying to give a different perspective on the issue, which was seen as weird.
I will also add though, i don't care what people think given they think bad of me, because at the end of the day it does not matter to me what other people think, people with enough sense will actively try to communicate their point and have an open ended conversation with me on it.
You're being called delusional due to the deluded argument you were trying to make. I don't care about streamers at all, nor about Andrew Tate (even tho with the latter example it's easy to be convinced that the respective entity is a scumbag), and I have not assumed that you like any of them.
Expect to be called out on stupid arguments (ie: the no proof part specifically) without getting personally offended, there's things to learn from it.
Hyopic [#20]andrew tate is a sex trafficker...
he isn't tho, but go ahead, be brainless and believe whatever mfs tell you