EG has the same util dominance that prime gambit had.
4
hot take.
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
babysasuke [#3]downvotes = facts
mald SHITMEA
wouldn’t say better but from what i’ve seen from eg so far it’s comparable to the level of dominance gambit had utility wise.
Waking_W [#5]I think gambit prospered due to nats lurks, those were diff back then, man single handedly made teams not rotate.
nats was a huge factor in their success but also his own success can be credited to how gambit worked space and timings with their utility. The way EG uses their utility almost perfectly never wasting it reminds me of how good gambit were with always having the perfect utility at the perfect times. EG just dosent have that lurker.
Art1st [#8]nats was a huge factor in their success but also his own success can be credited to how gambit worked space and timings with their utility. The way EG uses their utility almost perfectly never wasting it reminds me of how good gambit were with always having the perfect utility at the perfect times. EG just dosent have that lurker.
Look at fut vs EG map 1. They just dont run lurker agents on every map but c0m is really good at timings too
Art1st [#8]nats was a huge factor in their success but also his own success can be credited to how gambit worked space and timings with their utility. The way EG uses their utility almost perfectly never wasting it reminds me of how good gambit were with always having the perfect utility at the perfect times. EG just dosent have that lurker.
...Do they even need one?
ppmcpoopoo [#10]...Do they even need one?
that’s where the difference is for me, EG dosent have a set lurker but it feels like they always have one player taking that role after they’ve taken a lot of space.
Discord