SEN 2-0 SHARKS
completed
... 15 more matches
Friday, May 28th
1:25 PM EDT
Patch 2.09
TL ban Icebox; VKS ban Split; VKS pick Ascent; TL pick Haven; Bind remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
frz
VKS
|
3
4
-1
|
4
9
-5
|
5
5
+0
|
2
6
-4
|
3
9
-6
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
6
6
+0
|
6
6
+0
|
6
3
+3
|
6
4
+2
|
2
11
-9
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
2
8
-6
|
5
7
-2
|
3
7
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
8
8
+0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
6
8
-2
|
5
6
-1
|
1
9
-8
|
4
4
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
3
7
-4
|
4
9
-5
|
8
2
+6
|
7
2
+5
|
2
9
-7
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
0
1
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
4
2
+2
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
3
-3
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
4
-4
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
55
|
6
|
0
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
6
|
0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
0
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
|
ScreaM
TL
|
|
7
|
2
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
1
|
0
|
|
Kryptix
TL
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
5
|
2
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
4
|
0
|
|
soulcas
TL
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
0
|
0
|
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
0
|
3
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
0
3
-3
|
3
4
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
3
6
-3
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
4
2
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
4
2
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
1
6
-5
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
2
5
-3
|
3
1
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
6
6
+0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
3
4
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
0
4
-4
|
2
3
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
1
3
-2
|
2
4
-2
|
3
0
+3
|
4
2
+2
|
0
5
-5
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
0
1
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
2
0
+2
|
|
2
3
-1
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
3
0
+3
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
1
Round 17
ScreaM Jamppi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
1
Round 3
soulcas Kryptix |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 3
soulcas Kryptix |
|
|
|
50
|
2
|
0
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
4
Round 4
ScreaM soulcas
Round 14
L1NK ScreaM
Round 17
soulcas L1NK
Round 19
Kryptix soulcas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
4
|
0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
1
Round 19
ScreaM L1NK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
0
|
0
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
3
Round 9
L1NK Kryptix
Round 11
soulcas ScreaM
Round 15
Jamppi ScreaM |
1
Round 16
Kryptix Jamppi ScreaM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
0
|
|
ScreaM
TL
|
|
3
Round 4
frz gtn
Round 10
frz saadhak
Round 18
frz Sacy |
|
1
Round 5
saadhak gtn sutecas Sacy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
0
|
0
|
|
Kryptix
TL
|
|
1
Round 13
frz saadhak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
4
|
2
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
|
3
Round 11
Sacy sutecas
Round 13
sutecas gtn
Round 21
sutecas gtn |
1
Round 12
frz sutecas saadhak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
1
|
0
|
|
soulcas
TL
|
|
1
Round 3
saadhak sutecas |
1
Round 8
sutecas frz gtn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
1
Round 10
sutecas Sacy |
|
3
Round 1
frz saadhak Sacy sutecas
Round 14
Sacy sutecas frz saadhak
Round 19
Sacy sutecas frz saadhak |
1
Round 2
frz sutecas gtn saadhak Sacy |
1
Round 19
saadhak |
|
|
|
|
67
|
0
|
0
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
3
1
+2
|
1
5
-4
|
2
3
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
2
4
-2
|
1
4
-3
|
2
1
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
5
-4
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
0
3
-3
|
2
6
-4
|
2
4
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
3
4
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
2
1
+1
|
2
3
-1
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
2
4
-2
|
2
5
-3
|
5
2
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
2
4
-2
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
1
2
-1
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
ScreaM
TL
|
soulcas
TL
|
Kryptix
TL
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
frz
VKS
|
|
|
1
Round 11
ScreaM  L1NK  Kryptix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sacy
VKS
|
|
3
Round 4
 soulcas ScreaM
Round 11
soulcas Jamppi
Round 17
ScreaM soulcas |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 10
ScreaM Jamppi |
|
|
|
60
|
4
|
0
|
|
saadhak
VKS
|
|
2
Round 4
Kryptix Kryptix
Round 6
L1NK Jamppi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
2
|
0
|
|
gtn
VKS
|
|
1
Round 9
ScreaM Kryptix |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
0
|
|
sutecas
VKS
|
|
1
Round 3
Jamppi soulcas |
1
Round 2
Jamppi soulcas ScreaM |
|
|
1
Round 2
ScreaM |
|
|
|
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
|
ScreaM
TL
|
|
4
Round 2
frz gtn
Round 9
frz sutecas
Round 14
sutecas Sacy
Round 15
frz saadhak |
2
Round 3
saadhak gtn sutecas ScreaM
Round 16
Sacy gtn saadhak |
1
Round 18
frz Sacy sutecas saadhak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
1
|
0
|
|
Kryptix
TL
|
|
2
Round 13
frz saadhak
Round 15
sutecas gtn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
1
|
0
|
|
L1NK
TL
|
|
1
Round 5
gtn sutecas |
3
Round 4
Sacy saadhak gtn
Round 7
Sacy sutecas saadhak
Round 10
sutecas gtn saadhak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
3
|
0
|
|
soulcas
TL
|
|
3
Round 5
frz saadhak
Round 11
sutecas gtn
Round 13
Sacy gtn |
1
Round 8
Sacy frz gtn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
0
|
0
|
|
Jamppi
TL
|
|
3
Round 9
saadhak gtn
Round 12
gtn saadhak
Round 17
saadhak Sacy |
1
Round 1
sutecas gtn Sacy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
0
|
3
|
Stats from this map are not available yet
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Liquid_fan [#21]TL 2-0 VKS
It seems like a meme but VKS being a super top team does not want to adapt to the goal and that cost them everything I hope they work more for the Berlin masters
Liquid_fan
TimeZ [#16]Vks 2-0 liquid. Even if vks plays badly they 2-1 liquid. Liquid has to step it up wayy more if they want to move past vks. Saadhak supremacy
Saadhak??? LMFAO
thebrownlegend [#11]Do not see Vikings taking this against Liquid. Could def be a map 3 though
Liquid just better, unless they whiff like they did with v1
Ibis [#27]Dude you’re a fucking delusional KR simp and passionated EU hater
Idk about that. Just seems like a liquid fan to me lol
Underperforming liquid vs underperforming vks. I expected a lot more from both of these teams and I'm still hoping we see a good match. idk about picks here tho. Vks bans split and tl bans icebox. Both generally pick ascent so maybe tl ascent and vks haven with bind left over? Feel free to enlighten me. This game really depends on whos mind is in the game more. Thoughts?
TimeZ [#33]Underperforming liquid vs underperforming vks. I expected a lot more from both of these teams and I'm still hoping we see a good match. idk about picks here tho. Vks bans split and tl bans icebox. Both generally pick ascent so maybe tl ascent and vks haven with bind left over? Feel free to enlighten me. This game really depends on whos mind is in the game more. Thoughts?
That's a 100% sober comment lol Pretty on point. In the end it will come down to how much impact does ScreaM brings as well as how gtn and frz perform... I don't see Liquid as a team like Sentinels that is going to completely impose its strats and rhythm on VKS , unless ScreaM just go mad in both maps (which he hasn't done yet).
I feel like the duelist duo in VKS are falling short and that is what is difficulting the execution of strats by VKS.
Im biased for liquid but at the same time vikings hasnt showed anything too impressive yet. Will be interesting matches for sure. 2-1 for TL overall.
It would be cool to see if TL's comps can stand a chance against a team like SEN. They underperformed against V1, but against a team like SEN they could lose even if they are playing their A game.
Philosopher_Stone [#26]frz and gtn need to pick it up. That’s the only chance
spoiler: they wont. too much ego not enough gameplay to back it up
Dai7 [#35]That's a 100% sober comment lol Pretty on point. In the end it will come down to how much impact does ScreaM brings as well as how gtn and frz perform... I don't see Liquid as a team like Sentinels that is going to completely impose its strats and rhythm on VKS , unless ScreaM just go mad in both maps (which he hasn't done yet).
I feel like the duelist duo in VKS are falling short and that is what is difficulting the execution of strats by VKS.
can you imagine scream losing a single trade to gtn or frz? kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
p1lot [#34]Liquid 60% vs 40% VKS
GTN is so bad and Liquid is looking meeh
gtn with sunglasses + brazilian flag = biggest joke ever, 150 ACS duelist kkkkkkkkkkkk
whatspoppin [#59]guys, any1 know how some of them get insane colors? looks like sweetfx from csgo? :D
If I'm not wrong it's mostly nvidia settings
whatspoppin [#59]guys, any1 know how some of them get insane colors? looks like sweetfx from csgo? :D
nvidia control panel setting
Digital vibrance 100%
whatspoppin [#59]guys, any1 know how some of them get insane colors? looks like sweetfx from csgo? :D
digital vibrance
the_alex_andre [#61]nvidia control panel setting
Digital vibrance 100%
ive had that for ages but it surely doesnt look like this lol
TinglyPiano [#67]all these BR fake fans, when the team is losing there's no noise lmao
Thy're just trolls..
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#64]I don't think I've seen Sacy miss a Sova ult a single time.
reminds me of sinatraa before the ban
whatspoppin [#69]ive had that for ages but it surely doesnt look like this lol
set it on monitor tho
TinglyPiano [#78]people blaming on duelist, but even with good duelist, VKS will still lose.
they just got outplayed macro wise.
funny how liquid said they got dominated by vks in scrims xD not that scrims matter but ye, i guess u could use some of that scrim practice and turn it into a match :) what do i know i aint pro kekw
TinglyPiano [#78]people blaming on duelist, but even with good duelist, VKS will still lose.
they just got outplayed macro wise.
you think so i thought if they had someone like tenz or shahz they could definitely do better
Jkatona1 [#83]gtn gtn gtn
Not only gtn all the team is playing like shit now, VKS is only better than Sharks, X10, CR and MAYBE KRU, even V1 with 2 subs can beat them
Gunzout97 [#87]Also Brazil- “We Have a lot of TenZ in our region”
Sacy is idiot to said that, he thinks only because BR Server have some pugstars he can compare them to someone like TenZ
Peteer [#90]GG for TL, Brazil needs more tactical and improve errors
Their tactics aren't even bad. It's just execution and pure aim. Their Jett has worse fragging score than the rest of the players.
MarcGP1 [#95]BR teams went there to not play in BR style.. Shame..
vikings literally said they are just gonna play their BR style lol
hiimnsk [#98]kr deserved 2 slots instead imo
I wanted to watch Vision Strikers so bad on this lan :C
WAVYj [#100]I wanted to watch Vision Strikers so bad on this lan :C
yea i was super excited and then they didnt qualify, its insane how they went 60+ win streak and the first time they lose their knocked out
hiimnsk [#97]vikings literally said they are just gonna play their BR style lol
I did not see that, there was no aggression, any atempt of first pics.. FRZ in the last rounds stay 1min with operator locked in a single spot in a 3 bomb map..
Akiiz [#99]A bit disapointted in VKS, Liquid played really well the last 2 games tho
First map was good i think from vks since they did not win the pistols.. But second map was not good, but better than sentinels anyway.. I think overall BR teams choked..
MarcGP1 [#102]I did not see that, there was no aggression, any atempt of first pics.. FRZ in the last rounds stay 1min with operator locked in a single spot in a 3 bomb map..
There was aggression at the beginning of the maps, but that got easily shut down/countered as the games went on. I think it simply comes down to BR style being figured out, therefore making BR players to play something else which of course they are quite uncomfortable playing to begin with.
Glycoroldas [#104]There was aggression at the beginning of the maps, but that got easily shut down/countered as the games went on. I think it simply comes down to BR style being figured out, therefore making BR players to play something else which of course they are quite uncomfortable playing to begin with.
BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem.. I think our duelists needs to be better for our style to work.. But our teams with the best duelists did not qualify so.. Hhaha.. I would rather loose playing like Xand or Mwzera than loose like this..
MarcGP1 [#106]BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem.. I think our duelists needs to be better for our style to work.. But our teams with the best duelists did not qualify so.. Hhaha.. I would rather loose playing like Xand or Mwzera than loose like this..
You right, to be aggressive, duelists are the best, but on VKS they don't perform well, so the aggressive factor doesn't fit
MarcGP1 [#106]BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem.. I think our duelists needs to be better for our style to work.. But our teams with the best duelists did not qualify so.. Hhaha.. I would rather loose playing like Xand or Mwzera than loose like this..
BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem..
I think it is a problem in the current meta, there are far too many agents that can shut BR style quite effortlessly. Astra, Viper, Sage come to mind in particular.
Glycoroldas [#108]BR style is very easy to figure out, i dont think that is the problem..
I think it is a problem in the current meta, there are far too many agents that can shut BR style quite effortlessly. Astra, Viper, Sage come to mind in particular.
I agree with you, especialy this Viper meta.. I think they bufferd her too much and that ruin our style, in fact thats what made Gamelanders loose the Masters spot..
MarcGP1 [#109]I agree with you, especialy this Viper meta.. I think they bufferd her too much and that ruin our style, in fact thats what made Gamelanders loose the Masters spot..
in fact thats what made Gamelanders loose the Masters spot..
Pretty much my thoughts too, Gamelanders simply had no answer to viper's bullshit
This thread has been locked.
Discord