Azplicueta vs Laporte, Chelsea mci
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.19 1.34 0.33 | 310 352 60 | 13 13 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 71% 75% 50% | 200 224 60 | 16% 15% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.92 0.62 2.68 | 204 149 532 | 9 5 4 | / 13 13 0 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -8 +4 | 64% 58% 100% | 124 97 283 | 36% 64% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.29 0.20 0.84 | 76 72 100 | 3 2 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 5 1 | -11 -10 -1 | 57% 58% 50% | 45 43 56 | 13% 8% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
![]() |
0.07 0.16 0.01 | 69 81 | 2 2 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 3 3 0 | -12 -10 -2 | 29% 33% | 49 57 | 27% 27% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
![]() |
0.04 0.02 0.91 | 58 42 157 | 2 1 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 0 0 0 | -12 -11 -1 | 29% 17% 100% | 44 34 99 | 10% 0% 50% | 1 0 1 | 7 7 0 | -6 -7 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2.31 1.17 2.50 | 399 263 423 | 22 2 20 | / 5 1 4 / | 11 0 11 | +17 +1 +16 | 100% 100% 100% | 264 156 282 | 29% 18% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.55 1.22 1.60 | 346 425 333 | 17 3 14 | / 8 3 5 / | 6 0 6 | +9 0 +9 | 79% 50% 83% | 211 211 212 | 14% 30% 9% | 7 1 6 | 1 1 0 | +6 0 +6 | |
![]() |
1.46 0.73 1.59 | 231 120 250 | 12 1 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 12 1 11 | +6 0 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 152 101 161 | 15% 14% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.23 1.50 1.19 | 190 312 171 | 11 3 8 | / 5 2 3 / | 2 0 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 93% 100% 92% | 132 212 119 | 44% 80% 38% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
![]() |
1.09 0.36 1.21 | 152 72 167 | 7 0 7 | / 5 1 4 / | 6 1 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 125 72 133 | 33% 20% 37% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.34 0.33 1.19 | 310 352 60 | 13 13 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 71% 75% 50% | 200 224 60 | 16% 15% 33% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.62 2.68 0.92 | 204 149 532 | 9 5 4 | / 13 13 0 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -8 +4 | 64% 58% 100% | 124 97 283 | 36% 64% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.20 0.84 0.29 | 76 72 100 | 3 2 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 6 5 1 | -11 -10 -1 | 57% 58% 50% | 45 43 56 | 13% 8% 33% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
![]() |
0.16 0.01 0.07 | 69 81 | 2 2 0 | / 14 12 2 / | 3 3 0 | -12 -10 -2 | 29% 33% | 49 57 | 27% 27% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
![]() |
0.02 0.91 0.04 | 58 42 157 | 2 1 1 | / 14 12 2 / | 0 0 0 | -12 -11 -1 | 29% 17% 100% | 44 34 99 | 10% 0% 50% | 1 0 1 | 7 7 0 | -6 -7 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.17 2.50 2.31 | 399 263 423 | 22 2 20 | / 5 1 4 / | 11 0 11 | +17 +1 +16 | 100% 100% 100% | 264 156 282 | 29% 18% 31% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.22 1.60 1.55 | 346 425 333 | 17 3 14 | / 8 3 5 / | 6 0 6 | +9 0 +9 | 79% 50% 83% | 211 211 212 | 14% 30% 9% | 7 1 6 | 1 1 0 | +6 0 +6 | |
![]() |
0.73 1.59 1.46 | 231 120 250 | 12 1 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 12 1 11 | +6 0 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 152 101 161 | 15% 14% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
1.50 1.19 1.23 | 190 312 171 | 11 3 8 | / 5 2 3 / | 2 0 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 93% 100% 92% | 132 212 119 | 44% 80% 38% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
![]() |
0.36 1.21 1.09 | 152 72 167 | 7 0 7 | / 5 1 4 / | 6 1 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 125 72 133 | 33% 20% 37% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
Krisnerqlo [#3]Sikako coach? xdd
Yeah AYM not looking too good, but they're gonna have some great tik toks kekw
what an absurd...
so many good orgless teams and FA players but these tier4 players with tiktok star coach getting opportunities.
how an organization can find this profitable or even worth the investment? just stealing other people opportunities.
Maybe I'm too harsh on the players, I'm sure they have potential in the long run, but its clear to see its way to early for them to play in a professional league against developed teams/players, what a shame...
Darkhorse [#9]what an absurd...
so many good orgless teams and FA players but these tier4 players with tiktok star coach getting opportunities.
how an organization can find this profitable or even worth the investment? just stealing other people opportunities.
Maybe I'm too harsh on the players, I'm sure they have potential in the long run, but its clear to see its way to early for them to play in a professional league against developed teams/players, what a shame...
Nah AYM tried to go for the full spanish roster to get fanbase since they're a newer org, but it doesn't work because of the 3 spanish rule, they fucked up the roster. There's just not enough talent for that many spots yet
Kandinsky [#11]No way we're still doing Bo1s in 2023. Commence the RNG simulator I guess...
Bo1 is the best format for this leagues imo. At least for the viewer. I’m actually really happy they kept it