100T 2-0 with nitr0, Ethan, and Asuna being +40 in kills difference together.
completed
... 131 more matches
Thursday, April 8th
3:00 PM EDT
Patch 2.05
100T ban Split; ABX ban Haven; ABX pick Ascent; 100T pick Bind; Icebox remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
VODs
Maps/Stats
| Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100T |
1
|
3 (1)
|
0 (0)
|
4 (2)
|
13 (10)
|
ABX |
1
|
3 (1)
|
3 (0)
|
4 (1)
|
10 (5)
|
Eco: 0-5k
$ Semi-eco: 5-10k
$$ Semi-buy: 10-20k
$$$ Full buy: 20k+
|
(BANK)
100T
ABX
(BANK)
|
1
0.2k
0.2k
|
2
1.0k
$$
7.5k
|
3
10.6k
$$
$$$
0.2k
|
4
2.7k
$$
$$$
6.6k
|
5
7.3k
$$$
$
10.9k
|
6
10.0k
$$$
$$$
3.0k
|
7
19.6k
$$$
$
10.6k
|
8
27.7k
$$$
$$$
4.8k
|
9
16.0k
$$$
$$$
15.0k
|
10
14.2k
$$$
$$$
6.0k
|
11
4.3k
$$$
$$$
13.2k
|
12
1.0k
$$
$$$
7.1k
|
|
(BANK)
100T
ABX
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.2k
|
14
9.5k
$$
2.0k
|
15
1.3k
$$$
$$
10.4k
|
16
11.6k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
|
17
20.9k
$$$
$
8.0k
|
18
30.9k
$$$
$$$
1.9k
|
19
26.6k
$$$
$$
0.9k
|
20
35.0k
$$$
$$
0.4k
|
| Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
100T |
0
|
4 (1)
|
0 (0)
|
3 (2)
|
15 (10)
|
|
ABX |
2
|
2 (2)
|
3 (0)
|
8 (4)
|
9 (3)
|
Eco: 0-5k
$ Semi-eco: 5-10k
$$ Semi-buy: 10-20k
$$$ Full buy: 20k+
|
(BANK)
100T
ABX
(BANK)
|
1
0.1k
0.3k
|
2
9.3k
$$
0.8k
|
3
1.1k
$$$
$$
11.2k
|
4
5.8k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
|
5
8.8k
$$$
$
7.8k
|
6
14.8k
$$$
$$$
1.9k
|
7
5.5k
$$$
$$
2.5k
|
8
9.8k
$$
$$$
5.4k
|
9
8.4k
$$$
$$
1.6k
|
10
11.4k
$$
$$
2.9k
|
11
4.6k
$$$
$$$
12.4k
|
12
1.5k
$$$
$$$
17.1k
|
|
(BANK)
100T
ABX
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.3k
|
14
9.3k
$$
2.2k
|
15
12.6k
$$
$
7.9k
|
16
22.4k
$$$
$$$
0.5k
|
17
34.4k
$$$
$$
6.3k
|
18
33.1k
$$$
$$$
1.7k
|
19
18.8k
$$$
$$$
8.6k
|
20
15.9k
$$$
$$
2.8k
|
21
24.3k
$$$
$
9.4k
|
22
27.9k
$$$
$$$
3.0k
|
Stats from this map are not available yet
| Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
100T |
1
|
7 (2)
|
0 (0)
|
7 (4)
|
28 (20)
|
|
ABX |
3
|
5 (3)
|
6 (0)
|
12 (5)
|
19 (8)
|
Eco: 0-5k
$ Semi-eco: 5-10k
$$ Semi-buy: 10-20k
$$$ Full buy: 20k+
Head-to-head
Past Matches
greedeetv [#2]Also, what the hell is this seeding???!?!?!?
Why is V1 < ABX < C9 < BBG???
How the hell does that make sense????
bbg took sen spot, then c9 andbox and v1 are put into their position by rank
YOUDOYOU [#3]bbg took sen spot, then c9 andbox and v1 are put into their position by rank
If BBG took SEN's spot, then why are they playing XSET? XSET should be the fourth highest seed, putting BBG as the 5th highest seed. SEN would've been first. Also, then, wouldn't C9 take GENG's spot? Or V1 take Faze's spot? No. More likely, the tournament organizers either seeded the last four teams randomly, or asked some sort of expert on how he would rank the teams and that's how they did it. Because in terms of seeding, BBG < V1 < C9 < ABX, so that's not how they did it either. It's not something like Game +- either, because then C9B would be the highest seed and be playing XSET.
thebrownlegend [#5]100T 2-0. Andbox should not even be here. Open qualifiers brackets are so bad
it wasnt the bracket, its the fact that teams got upset because if LG didnt get upset then LG would probably have this spot
greedeetv [#4]If BBG took SEN's spot, then why are they playing XSET? XSET should be the fourth highest seed, putting BBG as the 5th highest seed. SEN would've been first. Also, then, wouldn't C9 take GENG's spot? Or V1 take Faze's spot? No. More likely, the tournament organizers either seeded the last four teams randomly, or asked some sort of expert on how he would rank the teams and that's how they did it. Because in terms of seeding, BBG < V1 < C9 < ABX, so that's not how they did it either. It's not something like Game +- either, because then C9B would be the highest seed and be playing XSET.
Here's the official ruleset for Challengers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iHjosZ2E22vxKIqp6R9TJ7G5HoSo8Mk4/view
The eight (8) teams qualifying into Challengers Week 1 from Qualifier 1 will be seeded by the metrics in the order detailed below (ties in one tier will make the next tier determine seeding):
- Match Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Map Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Round Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Pre-Tournament Seed
Everyone is tied on Match Win Percentage, so we look at Map Win Percentage, with Round Win Percentage for tie-break (and pre-tournament seed for NV and C9B):
- 100T: 8-0 (104-37)
- XSET: 8-0 (104-47)
- NV: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 4)
- C9B: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 14)
- IMT: 8-1 (108-50 - 68.35%)
- V1: 8-1 (114-83 - 57.87%)
- BBG: 8-2
- ANDBOX: 8-3
Deathsnacks [#10]Here's the official ruleset for Challengers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iHjosZ2E22vxKIqp6R9TJ7G5HoSo8Mk4/view
The eight (8) teams qualifying into Challengers Week 1 from Qualifier 1 will be seeded by the metrics in the order detailed below (ties in one tier will make the next tier determine seeding):
- Match Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Map Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Round Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
- Pre-Tournament Seed
Everyone is tied on Match Win Percentage, so we look at Map Win Percentage, with Round Win Percentage for tie-break (and pre-tournament seed for NV and C9B):
- 100T: 8-0 (104-37)
- XSET: 8-0 (104-47)
- NV: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 4)
- C9B: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 14)
- IMT: 8-1 (108-50 - 68.35%)
- V1: 8-1 (114-83 - 57.87%)
- BBG: 8-2
- ANDBOX: 8-3
Thanks, very helpful!
NSG_Observer_2 [#9]Free 2-0 for 100t how do they get such lucky teams to face
idk man, out of those teams the only one that poses more of a threat to 100t than ABX is NV, and I'd rather see those 2 fight in the finals than right at the start
NSG_Observer_2 [#9]Free 2-0 for 100t how do they get such lucky teams to face
This matchup should be good for 100T but they're staring down Immortals in the next round, with Rossy playing out of his mind on Astra they're a real threat. Also they're the number 1 seed so it makes sense they got an easy first round matchup.
I feel like with valorants number of rounds and economy there's going to be at least 1 month of a lot of upsets every year. Since the top 10 teams are winning so much that means they're playing more matches. Since the tier 2 teams are all knocked out in the first stage. During the second stage they have like 10 hours of total footage to look over while the tier 1 teams have like 1 hour of footage.
BluWasTaken [#13]I don't see how andbox can pull a win unless 100t shits the bed and yay goes crazy
A
HackNaija [#8]Hiko is an idiot, therefore they will lose. Ez andbox 2-0 with hiko 5-13 both maps
This will age will
greedeetv [#1]100T 2-0 with nitr0, Ethan, and Asuna being +40 in kills difference together.
Guess I kind of jinxed those three... lol
greedeetv [#1]100T 2-0 with nitr0, Ethan, and Asuna being +40 in kills difference together.
lol who could've expected steel and hiko up top
HackNaija [#8]Hiko is an idiot, therefore they will lose. Ez andbox 2-0 with hiko 5-13 both maps
Nailed it.
Discord