Extremely Controversial Discussion

Do you think the price pool of game changers champions should be equal to masters price pool? Thoughts and opinions??

Absolutely no

definitely not

Naw

Def yes
But it might also depend on viewership ig
Cz they work really hard too...they put hours in the game

No because money comes from viewership and sponsors. Lower viewership = less sponsors = lower pricepool. Can’t pull money out yo ass

RedChilli7 [#5]

Def yes
But it might also depend on viewership ig
Cz they work really hard too...they put hours in the game

Flair checks out

RedChilli7 [#5]

Def yes
But it might also depend on viewership ig
Cz they work really hard too...they put hours in the game

I agree with viewership part which can compensate in bringing the revenue...

I mean i feel like everyone would be happy if it was but they just dont get nearly the same amount of viewership in that section of VCT

andrewdamf [#7]

Flair checks out

I really dont support them....i just like the flair tbh

FoechiGG [#6]

No because money comes from viewership and sponsors. Lower viewership = less sponsors = lower pricepool. Can’t pull money out yo ass

Personally I feel like the overall price pool should be 200k max....otherwise it's not fair for people who compete in regular vct.

unironicKEKVV [#11]

Personally I feel like the overall price pool should be 200k max....otherwise it's not fair for people who compete in regular vct.

otherwise it's not fair for people who compete in regular vct

true and based

Pogtestic [#4]

Naw

Its like nba vs wnba tbh

No, level of play is lower

depends on viewership

Nope

no bcs less star players=less viewership=less sponsors=less prize pool.

It should be double, maybe even triple