Fusion - Kru Dcopium
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.08 1.84 | 298 224 367 | 23 9 14 | / 15 9 6 / | 8 2 6 | +8 0 +8 | 74% 64% 83% | 193 124 255 | 27% 19% 31% | 3 1 2 | 5 4 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.46 0.69 | 270 398 153 | 20 14 6 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 4 0 | +2 +3 -1 | 61% 73% 50% | 169 247 98 | 21% 29% 10% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.83 0.94 | 147 175 122 | 15 8 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 2 2 | -1 -2 +1 | 70% 64% 75% | 97 100 95 | 25% 19% 33% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.71 0.02 1.42 | 121 36 200 | 11 1 10 | / 14 12 2 / | 2 0 2 | -3 -11 +8 | 61% 36% 83% | 71 25 113 | 14% 0% 18% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.70 0.38 1.00 | 152 111 191 | 11 3 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 10 5 5 | -6 -7 +1 | 83% 73% 92% | 93 78 105 | 15% 4% 27% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.87 1.76 1.99 | 366 354 381 | 30 14 16 | / 14 8 6 / | 2 1 1 | +16 +6 +10 | 78% 58% 100% | 231 224 239 | 20% 21% 20% | 3 1 2 | 3 3 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.92 0.57 1.30 | 179 114 251 | 16 5 11 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -4 +4 | 65% 67% 64% | 116 64 172 | 35% 36% 35% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.83 0.25 1.46 | 211 117 315 | 17 4 13 | / 18 11 7 / | 1 0 1 | -1 -7 +6 | 61% 42% 82% | 138 74 208 | 22% 21% 23% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.82 0.52 1.15 | 133 90 182 | 9 3 6 | / 14 9 5 / | 5 1 4 | -5 -6 +1 | 74% 58% 91% | 91 64 121 | 18% 36% 11% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.39 0.51 0.26 | 111 79 148 | 8 3 5 | / 18 8 10 / | 2 0 2 | -10 -5 -5 | 52% 42% 64% | 72 49 98 | 32% 33% 31% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.96 0.99 0.97 | 201 200 226 | 42 20 22 | / 45 22 23 / | 18 5 13 | -3 -2 -1 | 67% 70% 63% | 139 115 161 | 19% 16% 22% | 6 2 4 | 10 7 3 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
1.19 0.56 0.86 | 228 314 159 | 45 29 16 | / 48 24 24 / | 8 5 3 | -3 +5 -8 | 58% 67% 50% | 144 189 105 | 24% 34% 14% | 7 5 2 | 9 3 6 | -2 +2 -4 | |
|
0.20 1.11 0.66 | 150 85 201 | 29 7 22 | / 44 26 18 / | 8 4 4 | -15 -19 +4 | 54% 41% 67% | 94 62 122 | 23% 20% 24% | 3 0 3 | 10 7 3 | -7 -7 0 | |
|
0.70 0.61 0.65 | 111 124 105 | 25 12 13 | / 44 21 23 / | 11 6 5 | -19 -9 -10 | 56% 63% 50% | 81 79 83 | 21% 22% 21% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.61 0.62 0.62 | 139 129 154 | 27 10 17 | / 47 21 26 / | 16 11 5 | -20 -11 -9 | 68% 74% 63% | 91 88 93 | 23% 16% 30% | 2 0 2 | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.53 1.58 1.55 | 267 268 290 | 57 29 28 | / 29 14 15 / | 5 2 3 | +28 +15 +13 | 79% 73% 85% | 182 175 191 | 20% 24% 16% | 5 1 4 | 6 4 2 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
1.61 1.33 1.48 | 261 257 249 | 57 31 26 | / 32 15 17 / | 23 16 7 | +25 +16 +9 | 79% 83% 74% | 162 162 161 | 29% 28% 31% | 6 4 2 | 4 2 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.17 1.27 1.22 | 245 249 230 | 50 27 23 | / 36 20 16 / | 14 7 7 | +14 +7 +7 | 77% 73% 81% | 159 156 163 | 25% 25% 24% | 14 9 5 | 6 4 2 | +8 +5 +3 | |
|
0.80 1.29 1.04 | 170 129 203 | 32 13 19 | / 33 19 14 / | 14 9 5 | -1 -6 +5 | 84% 73% 96% | 115 99 132 | 29% 27% 31% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.82 0.85 0.83 | 175 115 235 | 32 13 19 | / 38 17 21 / | 17 8 9 | -6 -4 -2 | 75% 73% 78% | 117 81 157 | 26% 36% 22% | 8 3 5 | 4 2 2 | +4 +1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.79 0.71 0.96 | 196 181 228 | 13 7 6 | / 16 11 5 / | 6 3 3 | -3 -4 +1 | 72% 75% 67% | 130 117 157 | 15% 15% 15% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.73 0.84 | 201 205 194 | 14 9 5 | / 16 11 5 / | 2 1 1 | -2 -2 0 | 44% 50% 33% | 122 122 123 | 21% 29% 15% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.71 0.80 0.52 | 152 156 146 | 10 6 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 4 0 | -6 -3 -3 | 67% 75% 50% | 100 103 93 | 42% 38% 60% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.45 0.20 0.95 | 113 64 212 | 6 2 4 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | -10 -8 -2 | 44% 33% 67% | 87 54 153 | 27% 20% 33% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
0.42 0.59 0.07 | 65 85 27 | 5 3 2 | / 14 9 5 / | 4 3 1 | -9 -6 -3 | 44% 58% 17% | 54 67 27 | 15% 23% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.80 2.23 1.59 | 296 323 284 | 22 9 13 | / 8 2 6 / | 6 2 4 | +14 +7 +7 | 83% 83% 83% | 177 197 167 | 23% 18% 29% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.48 1.10 1.68 | 239 189 265 | 16 5 11 | / 8 3 5 / | 1 0 1 | +8 +2 +6 | 83% 83% 83% | 156 103 183 | 14% 19% 11% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.44 1.08 1.63 | 285 88 385 | 18 4 14 | / 11 3 8 / | 8 2 6 | +7 +1 +6 | 94% 83% 100% | 206 111 254 | 25% 67% 20% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.34 1.49 1.26 | 209 275 177 | 14 6 8 | / 9 3 6 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +3 +2 | 78% 83% 75% | 150 169 140 | 20% 13% 28% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.47 0.93 | 126 84 147 | 8 2 6 | / 12 5 7 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 94% 83% 100% | 99 105 96 | 50% 38% 58% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.84 0.68 0.89 | 217 284 196 | 12 4 8 | / 14 4 10 / | 1 1 0 | -2 0 -2 | 56% 75% 50% | 133 187 116 | 25% 27% 24% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.68 1.82 0.30 | 213 411 147 | 11 6 5 | / 14 2 12 / | 2 0 2 | -3 +4 -7 | 69% 100% 58% | 134 231 102 | 33% 70% 17% | 3 2 1 | 5 0 5 | -2 +2 -4 | |
|
0.57 0.66 0.54 | 120 97 128 | 5 1 4 | / 14 2 12 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -1 -8 | 50% 75% 42% | 89 55 100 | 21% 33% 19% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.45 1.35 0.15 | 109 186 84 | 6 4 2 | / 14 2 12 / | 4 0 4 | -8 +2 -10 | 50% 75% 42% | 72 83 69 | 8% 10% 7% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.39 0.68 0.29 | 114 97 121 | 6 1 5 | / 14 2 12 / | 2 2 0 | -8 -1 -7 | 50% 75% 42% | 78 69 81 | 17% 0% 27% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.92 2.34 0.64 | 308 366 137 | 19 17 2 | / 8 4 4 / | 14 13 1 | +11 +13 -2 | 94% 100% 75% | 210 242 114 | 31% 32% 29% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.64 1.93 0.79 | 314 368 154 | 19 17 2 | / 9 6 3 / | 4 3 1 | +10 +11 -1 | 100% 100% 100% | 200 231 108 | 31% 33% 20% | 7 6 1 | 2 1 1 | +5 +5 0 | |
|
1.64 1.25 2.78 | 251 192 430 | 15 8 7 | / 7 5 2 / | 5 5 0 | +8 +3 +5 | 88% 83% 100% | 167 132 275 | 30% 21% 50% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.18 1.52 0.15 | 196 223 116 | 11 10 1 | / 7 3 4 / | 2 1 1 | +4 +7 -3 | 75% 83% 50% | 141 161 81 | 31% 32% 25% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.78 1.00 0.13 | 130 165 27 | 6 6 0 | / 9 6 3 / | 7 6 1 | -3 0 -3 | 88% 100% 50% | 81 99 27 | 24% 28% 0% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 |
SamBR [#24]LEV is about to win Heaven
LEV 3-0?
Why? LEV won 2 out of the last 3 havens and still lost the series
Enzolp [#23]No sé, LEV siempre juega mejor vs KRU, por mi que ganen, porque no creo que ganen el LCQ vs br
LEV VS KRU 😈🔥
LEV VS BR's team 🥶⚰️
trembolonaRage [#28]WTF
Byebye NiP?
Nothing to worry about i think, LEV always manage to choke versus KRU
I really hope KRU makes it.
Bjorn_Bernarsson [#42]is the lan pressure getting to kru??
last playoffs were on lan too. i think lev is just getting better.
alice_ [#43]last playoffs were on lan too. i think lev is just getting better.
i was under the impression that last playoffs there was little to no crowd?
alice_ [#43]last playoffs were on lan too. i think lev is just getting better.
ese es el beneficio de jugar el Bo5 en lower
no como anterior mente que solo era 1 ahora son 2 y en el resto de el mundo son 3
creo que vamos bien como reguin
Enzolp [#50]Pienso igual que los primeros dos mapas es donde más chances tiene en general LEV para ganarle a KRU, puede haber un reverse sweep tranquilamente.
Aunque otra vez digo, por mi que gane LEV, KRU tiene más chances contra NIP
LEV se mira super prendido sobre todo por el match de ayer contra Fusion en el Bo5
mientras que Kru viene mas bajo por ese dia de descanso y repaso asi como overwhelmed
Olofboost [#40]It would also be one of the greatest moments in trembolona's life
what trembolona's mean ?
Lixer [#51]LEV se mira super prendido sobre todo por el match de ayer contra Fusion en el Bo5
mientras que Kru viene mas bajo por ese dia de descanso y repaso asi como overwhelmed
Obvio, estoy de acuerdo, tacolilla está en su peak performance junto con shy, hasta ahora shy había pasado desapercibido pero estos dos games (menos la primera mitad del primer mapa) está súper prendido, no sé cuál es su clutch% en este match pero seguro que es alto.
Ahora, hablando de mapas, KRU domino siempre en split y el breeze de LEV demostró no ser tan bueno. Siento sinceramente que si gana LEV es 3-2 en el bind (ojalá me equivoqué y lo terminen acá jaja).
Enzolp [#53]Obvio, estoy de acuerdo, tacolilla está en su peak performance junto con shy, hasta ahora shy había pasado desapercibido pero estos dos games (menos la primera mitad del primer mapa) está súper prendido, no sé cuál es su clutch% en este match pero seguro que es alto.
Ahora, hablando de mapas, KRU domino siempre en split y el breeze de LEV demostró no ser tan bueno. Siento sinceramente que si gana LEV es 3-2 en el bind (ojalá me equivoqué y lo terminen acá jaja).
sisi y el nivel creciera muchisimo si se jugaran 3 Bo5 como en el resto de el mundo
recuerda que antes era solo 1
13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-----13-0------13-0---------------------------- 13-0---------13-0
13-0------------------13-0----------------------------13-0------------13-0
13-0-----------13-0-13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0---------------------------13-0-----------13-0
13-0-----13-0-------13-0----------------------------13-0---------13-0
13-0---------13-013-0--------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-----13-0------13-0---------------------------- 13-0---------13-0
13-0------------------13-0----------------------------13-0------------13-0
13-0-----------13-0-13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0---------------------------13-0-----------13-0
13-0-----13-0-------13-0----------------------------13-0---------13-0
13-0---------13-013-0--------------------------------13-013-013-0
SamBR [#61]13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-----13-0------13-0---------------------------- 13-0---------13-0
13-0------------------13-0----------------------------13-0------------13-0
13-0-----------13-0-13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0---------------------------13-0-----------13-0
13-0-----13-0-------13-0----------------------------13-0---------13-0
13-0---------13-013-0--------------------------------13-013-013-0
Jinx it
Skyss [#66]13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-----13-0------13-0---------------------------- 13-0---------13-0
13-0------------------13-0----------------------------13-0------------13-0
13-0-----------13-0-13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0---------------------------13-0-----------13-0
13-0-----13-0-------13-0----------------------------13-0---------13-0
13-0---------13-013-0--------------------------------13-013-013-0
Nice jinx bruh
avepalto [#31]Siendo realista, es mas probable que KRU le gane a NiP que LEV, asi que mejor que pierdan.
Sim, porque a Kru é mto superior a Lev, esse jogo mostrou exatamente isso... bom raciocinio.
waelkhrais [#83]Sim, porque a Kru é mto superior a Lev, esse jogo mostrou exatamente isso... bom raciocinio.
?? KRU won 2-0 against LEV just 2 weeks ago, sometimes underdog wins happens, if match ups didnt matter then there is no reason to have more than 1 seed for region.
KRU have a better match up against NIP than LEV.
Enzolp [#98]?? KRU won 2-0 against LEV just 2 weeks ago, sometimes underdog wins happens, if match ups didnt matter then there is no reason to have more than 1 seed for region.
KRU have a better match up against NIP than LEV.
the same thing happened with Loud and Optic, and even so Optic can be considered superior because it knew how to adapt the game and come back better
mefe [#92]what happened to KRÜ?
leviatan grinded like 12 hours a day and keznit was watch partying instead of preparing for lev yesterday thats what happens
waelkhrais [#107]the same thing happened with Loud and Optic, and even so Optic can be considered superior because it knew how to adapt the game and come back better
The guard came as first seed of NA winning against Optic, but Optic proved being better at international events. Competitive valorant is not linear, KRU has a lot of experience against BR teams and LEV flopped when they played against NIP (not to mention LCQ). It's not crazy to think that KRU is more likely to perform better against NIP than LEV.
Enzolp [#23]No sé, LEV siempre juega mejor vs KRU, por mi que ganen, porque no creo que ganen el LCQ vs br
Hermano, me sacaste las palabras de la boca. Soy de kru y tambien fan de Lev, por lo que me encanta que lev haya clasificado a masters ahora, porque no los veia con ninguna oportunidad en el lcq contra brasil, en cambio a Kru si, se van a cojer a los br y vamos a tener a los dos equipos de latam sur en masters
ELpepino09 [#124]A
Look at my boy Tacolilla here ;(
This marked the birth of a new LEV. No longer a simple Challengers team, but a LEV forged to compete in the international stage... but in return the tragic fall of Tacolilla began