the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
| Flag: | Australia |
| Registered: | April 1, 2021 |
| Last post: | February 8, 2026 at 7:23 AM |
| Posts: | 379 |
the number of sinatraa fans who know that he did it and still say "oh but he's changed, you cant hold it over him forever" say otherwise
xerxia beat optic in close matches both times they played, where is this "shit on" you speak of
they qualified to masters 3 by winning Stage 3 Challengers Playoffs, not by winning Masters 2. Also they're still tier 1 depending on where you draw that line.
you work for a rapist mate you cant be getting mad at this
smacked acend + hardest quarterfinal match at berlin + only team to take a map off gambit in the playoffs + group of death at champs + ratio
I'd put loud low A, high B-ish myself, but regardless loud is the best team brazil's ever had by far and sacy+saadhak almost beat gambit at champs so there's reason to have hope
because brazil has historically been a shit region
generally being in the same tier would mean zeta has a chance of beating fnatic
theyre not dropping tenz or dapr for wardell i can tell you that right now
if fnatic lose to zeta even with 2 stand ins ill delete my account
it means the region that wins that matchup has their top seed given a bye
assuming KRU win tomorrow and the LATAM-BR playoff is LEV vs NIP:
If NIP wins, LOUD goes to playoffs
If LEV wins, KRU goes to playoffs
edit: nvm someone already said this, ignore me
ikr, especially with NA beating APAC TWICE at that same event
its more understandable since they were playing without zeek
did you not see pansy and hypoc or were you just dropped on your head as a child
tenz literally was worth 7 digits. but yeah this sounds like complete bs
tenz's buyout was a mil, which is 7 figures
Will Engh also be allowed to coach them? the tweet only mentions the players themselves which is concerning
yeah youre right youre only allowed to support one team mb
yes but we're talking about consistency, not titles
acend underperformed at M3 while Gambit barely lost in the grand finals at champions. Gambit went way further than Acend in Stage 2 as well
i mean not to take away from acend but red bull home ground where gambit were playing sova on split and clearly trying out new strats really doesnt count
id say gambit rather than acend but yes acend have been good for more than just champions
KR<BR is an indefensible take, 0/8
pretty obvious sarcasm, its about the fact that vlr has been deleting posts about ukraine due to the No Politics rule
yes. the guard still struggled on the other two maps, which they would not do against a t3 team.
says a lot about the guard for getting smacked on split and almost beaten on haven by a t3 team then...
im fairly sure they havent changed the answer list from the original
fuck vlr why does it default to making a new comment when im trying to reply too quickly and why tf cant i delete comments
he means getting a negative number of kills, as in less than zero kills (hence "somehow")
Reyna is not S tier and Omen is not worse than Brim
is he wrong tho? obviously there are reasons for it but currently the scene is an absolute joke, at least in valorant
the form of all four of those teams was very varied across the tournament so while VK and VKS deserve credit for almost beating acend and gambit, they cant be considered as good as Acend and Gambit's peak form (grand finals). Both acend and gambit struggled in their games against the brazilian teams and later got better, and both VK and VKS played way worse in their next games and got eliminated handily. FNATIC's form was pretty consistent and C9's was consistent after their initial game against FNC so the fact that VS almost beat both of them shows that they are a playoffs-calibre team.