not many teams needed players tbh, he will be in franchising either way so np
Flag: | Vatican City State |
Registered: | May 13, 2021 |
Last post: | February 10, 2025 at 1:43 PM |
Posts: | 3915 |
not many teams needed players tbh, he will be in franchising either way so np
masters 2 sumup: all teams fucking suck because there are no real top tier igls in valorant and the only team itw that has one won the tournament, the rest of the teams are gimmicks merchants who would be tier99 if there was a tournament every week instead of 3 months
I dont understand why washed up csgo veterans dont switch and become igls, we need more veterans with deep understanding of the game and how to play fundamentally like ange1
never, only thing why he is in tier1 is because he is igl but if he cant adapt to opponents and be an elite caller then he will be gone as soon as new igls who can do this emerge, same for 95% of valorant igls, only thing they can do is make a plan and do that set plan, ange1 best igl not even close
same logic as if DACH got their own qualifier and morons said they were not EU
s1mple once he wins some more majors and switches to valorant will be this player
optimistic mentality from you to say the least, the fact valorant needs popular teams in order to have viewers watch the games just proves the fanbase is mostly casuals and no1 is here to watch the game itself but just watch their national teams and players they like
what are all this dogshit lists all of you are doing? you fucking platinum dogs, these lists are so braindead, call them top performers as of today not best players in emea, you simply dont lose your spot because of 1 meh performance, derke is still top1. if we are talking about players, wtf is boaster doing here? he had a huge overperformance but he is nowhere close to being a top10 player, he is only in tier1 because of his creativity, as a player he is lackluster
he still destroyed every in emea challenegers which is also part of this split, he might have underperformed but he is better than most in this list, s1mple has 1 bad tournament and he suddently isnt top10 player anymore? what stupid logic is this? they guy is still a top2 player in emea, you simply dont lose your spot for a mediocre performance
thats simply not true, take turkish vrl stats too, he was putting 250 acs consistently on sentinels, thats the best in all vrl
the fans knew him too, you are just a casual
alfajer didnt come out of nowhere, he was destroying every1 in vrl finals, every1 knew him
I hope they do this, Vitality could do very well at lcq
NA looking to steal EU talent again...
this team could stop them maybe:
Leo - initiator
twisten - duelist
monster - sentinel
sayf - controller/make this man an igl we need igls
jamppi - chamber/flex
Derke - Duelist/Chamber
Shao - Initiator/flex
ange1 - Igl /controller
suygetsu - flex/sentinel
chronicle - Chamber/flex
who stops this CIS superteam?
true, you are right my bad
NA= C9 (Seriously how bad has NA become that these are the teams in lcq, all so bad)
EMEA= M3C
APAC= BLEED
SA= KRU & FUSION
EA= EDWARD GAMING
tbf it only affects teams individual stats, the regional stats wouldnt change
I think you should only count interregional matchups
valorant will be same as dota, europe and china fighting each other
there are no tells for fpx, they change everything from match to match, they play like its cs and have no main comps, literally antistratable
CIS lol, that region is dead besides gambit and fpx dont even have a full CIS lineup, CIS teams are dogshit
told you all fpx would have won iceland
dont play survival, only servers are fun, normal minecraft is just boring nowadays
totally no, just read what I said, unless you want to ignore north latam region and let it die then you cant have latam+brazil competing online together
yes, maybe in the future if they add more servers in different countries and the region develops their internet conecction so there is more choices so for example a team from north latam and one from south latam could maybe play in a central server located in panama or something like that
because its only southern latam teams so its fine, dota is just peruvians, r6 its all brazil and maybe some argentinians if lucky and cs is just argentinians, those countries all get good ping to brazil, its different if its colombia or even latam north countries, distance from chile capital to colombia capital is 4,446 km, thats more than new delhi to singapore distance which is 4152 km, totally not acceptable conditions for vct, and dont get me strated on if a team is from chile/argentina and the other is from mexico, then its just not just bad ping but impossible
yes, imagine a team from chile playing from santiago against a team from colombia, would be terrible and also internet is awful in south america
way bigger difference, it might not look like it in normal maps but europe is small af, south america is huge and thats not even taking into account the fact there is north latam teams playing who would get 150+ ping against southern teams, if you dont host everything on lan then there it has to be like this because online would be impossible
because they are afraid of giving europe too much slots, they dont want it to become like cs so they prefer to fuck europe and give their slots to others, the fact south america gets 4 slots at champions while europe only gets 3 is so funny
there is an effect in ping in latam wdym, you are just talking out of your ass
if thats true then I AM DEAD, HAHAHAHAHHAA, HOW AHGHEAGBhbnhnEHN JIAGHNHNI
they can scream, a mask doesnt make them unable to scream
they are still playing well regionally, then by your logic its a best performers from this tournament list not a best players in the world list
thats understandable but its so weird that he doesnt dislike how slow the bullets are with ads on
he wasnt good in cs because he is nothing special, just lucky all world class fps talent is in cs, there are at least 200 players with potential to be better than yay in european cs alone
dogshit list, this is not a worlds best player rankings, this is just a recency biased list of this tournament best performers, derke for example might have underperformed but he is still better than that, why do we do this in valorant? imagine s1mple or zywoo have a bad tournament and suddenly they wouldnt be top10 players itw according to valorant fans logic?
xset loud fnatic, every1 else performed better or similar to expectations
my source is I have watched some european teams play in japan in preseason games these last years and man they are dead, a crowd that doesnt go ape mode is dogshit in esports, this is not a tennis match
"the audience was insanely loud those thundersticks are no joke at all" stopped reading there, try to make sense next time
I heard people were fighting in that crowd, it feels like a football match
"They are loud in football and baseball." only loud cuz its a lot of people there, japanese are soulles, they will never be on the level of western crowds, they are too polite to be a great crowd