Thanks; excellent work - a key conclusion of the overall picture so far ... needed for this website.

6'1, 220lbs... 13%bf ...if helps

edit: waiting in a long line
...LMAO

TSM has won four of the four games they've played this year against 100T - actually... a pretty impressive record from TSM.

Excellent reading... Great supporter. Good luck tomorrow!

"They were all super motivated grinders and seemed really wholesome (Saya especially)." <3

LVPes2
ru_VALORANT
valleague_fr
valorantleague_dach
valorantleague_tr
valorantesports3

All of the above are streaming G2 vs. Liquid right now.

Who are you, again? What a cringe kid ...

haha got you! Are we being mad or actually trying to flex here, cringe boi?

Revlon get your sorry ass outta here... nadda legit boi... be riding cringe

all day long

nvm... this kiddo is known for his delusions

kid, u'r trippin

Well... Thank you

It's utterly ridiculous to see that neither Faze nor 100T can attack on one of the game's first maps. I'm talking about how Ascent map vs. Faze played out with 19W for defence and only 3W for attack... And it's just Faze that won all three rounds on the attack... What's up with 100T's attack on Ascent? And why 5 pro players +pro coaching staff can't make a decent play from their attacking side? This is just unacceptable at this level, though same applies to Faze. That's all there is to it... https://www.vlr.gg/123327/faze-clan-vs-100-thieves-champions-tour-north-america-last-chance-qualifier-ubsf/?game=93487&tab=overview

Also, based on some recent observations, 100T has to tighten up their defence on Haven and Icebox if they wish to defeat their opponents on those maps.

Not a fact! Where's Curry and where's Will? It looks more like Will = Mitch than what you stated from the below stats page:

https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1130/champions-tour-north-america-last-chance-qualifier

With the addition of Jady, M3C are looking scary... can't wait to see

But someone would say, "Derke is edging out Yay on Chamber": https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen?exclude=12560.12561.12562.12563.12564.12565.12566.12567&min_rounds=0&agent=chamber ... and they'd be correct ... by a small margin but still...

^^^That is, of course, if we said in approximate terms and ignored the difference of rounds played (-80) between the two. However, up until somewhere over a 1k+ rounds were played (more=better ofc), neither Yay's, nor the total rounds played by any other masters contestants, would give us a reliable sample for any thorough head to head rating.

Time period glimpses such as short/instant masters events in general will always remain just glimpses - should be viewed as a possible periods of assessment for teams/players ... Perhaps a lengthier, season like league environment would bring us closer to accurately ranking any players in question, given that both compete there against each other as well as the same opponents. Up untill then, things will always remain ambigous, especially when ranking up players that statistically perform close to each other throughout different occasions - our time period here.

P.S. I can't say much about Derke against. FPX with the sub other than Derke's ability to perform well and SEIDER's reasonably solid form vs. Derke in duels: https://www.vlr.gg/112321/fnatic-vs-funplus-phoenix-valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen-ubqf/?game=all&tab=performance - PERFORMANCE TAB!

I know you're talking about OPTIC as a team and not only Yay's sole effort here... Just trying to emphasize Optic's team effort in general that lead them towards their final placement.

Though #29 FoechiGG's response to Leo vs Optic holds some truth. From their first clash, Leo dominated all Optic players across all duels except Marved, who he failed to outkill by one frag to equalise their score throughout all duels.

https://www.vlr.gg/112282/optic-gaming-vs-guild-esports-valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen-opening-a/?game=all&tab=performance in PERFORMANCE TAB

Aye, we've heard that...

In fact, it is so lame that it not only continues to dominate in international VAL but also lives rent free in your already peanut-like brain. Perhaps allocating its rent-free status inside your back door would be a better solution?

Think about it ;)

I mean he isnt incorrect as that's from the champs but if you love numbers then here's one more for you:

https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen

I'd guess if you gave Derke 100+ rounds to equal Yay's round count, they'd still be in the same places to eachother, or Derke would be higher because he'd done it before, as in the champions one above... Both are fine in my opinion, but the margin speaks for itself... Just my two cents...

Lame troll LMAO ... actually

You are just delusional ... calling "shitmea" while scoring that M3C flair... I mean bruvvv, you're reaching those new hights, kid

Frankly, I don't get it - Are you somewhat challenged or something?
Like people on here support either one or many regions equally, or maybe they just enjoy watching Valorant all together while having a great time without bs? The regional bull cap that you're pushing on here exists only in your little, peanutlike brain ...and does not apply to all members equally, speaking of delucions.

Besides, everything I have said up to this point without even mentioning your location, regions, or anything else other than asserting your fundamental incapacity to engage with others on here, should communicate to you something about me, no? Yet, you're still on the topic like a true chump. Well done!

P.S. LMAO... and you still don't get THE HINT, do you? The CRINGE is STRONG in you, kid... STRONG AF - not even capping on here ;)

What a SALTY, little weasel you are...

Yeah, dumbo, the fact that I was born in NA certainly has no bearing on your peanutlike brain. I mean, why would you be able to comprehend such concepts in the first place?

P.S. You still didn't get it, did you?

First, On VLR, one does not simply make an educated guess about its members' flags-locations... you must first ask them**.

Second, sometimes, especially in today's age of globalisation, people have to reside in different places across the world, therefore selecting the proper flag as their present location is never a mistake - this is how I personally roll on forums.

And last, is there anything else you'd like to flex on me, so that I could, again and again, educate you on on the matter and show you how cringely off you are? Please, don't be shy, kido ;)

Merriam-Webster's definition of the idiom "thick skin": the antonym of thin skin:
an ability to keep from getting upset or offended by the things other people say and do.

This^^^ As long as it helps you in the comprehension of specific, useful terms. I don't usually ignore situations when I can be of help. But bruvvv... really?

--> Now, please stay on the topic and please continue to enlighten me on which REGION you were talking about when you mentioned, "shroud owns ur region?"

To be honest, I don't understand... coping with what? Are you seriously assuming that my skin is thinner than your pp? Or are you actually that new to the internet, let alone forums?

Besides, Shroud is from NA... so am I ... What region are you referring to?

Oh, I see we're barking at the flag now. How low....how low... :NotLikeThis:

Hey, I value your and everyone else's time and opinion on this site, and I will always attempt to be as honest and objective as possible in my responses to you and others. However, if you chose to write something braindead and unfunny, you will get something braindead and unfunny in return - the nature of the beast.

On the more encouraging side of things, there's no need to get salty about it... you simply DEAL WITH IT, kid ;)

This take is disgustingly good tho ... LMAO

STOP DREAMING CRINGE! It's school time ;)

P.S. You still didn't get it, did you?

It's all good; no worries <3

And then you wake up from your wet dream ... wait, you what mate?

Wait a minute? Flukepx? Shitmea? Ohh, I see... you're malding, kido... out of your skin, malding... If you ask me, you're pathetic... but well, let it be your lesson how things eventually play out ;) Also, please keep your shitheaders to yourself because no one wants to read a bunch of crocodile tears through your mess. But please allow FPX fans to enjoy their highlight of the day. Back then, when Optic had their victory day, no one took the celebration away from them. Yet you and your wiesel-like ass is enraged to the extremes just because thing didn't play out to your favour. Why am I not surprised here, LMAO.

On the other hand, DON'T F-ING DRAGG FNS INTO YOUR CRINGEVALLEYLIKE CONVERSATIONS - he does not belong here. Pujan would never state that OPTIC are far superior to FPX right now or in general, because he's a decent guy who is typically reasonable and humble. Nor he would state something ambigous with cringe certainty like you often do. At the end of the day, he is experinced player/IGL and knows how to control his emotions by stating perfectly weighted opinions in public.

Lastly, just a little decyphering for you... By claiming in his twitter that Optic were not at their peak, Pujan is just expressing that he believes that it is somewhat his fault and that he accepts responsibility for their failure - nothing more, nothing less (learn to read between the lines, you...)

Now take your pathetic mass of a body and put it into bed... you need some good sleep tonight!

Ohh boi...

For those who were aware of him, it was always expected that he would continue to be a CRACKED superstar.

BTW... he's also CIS - First Strike Champion, for those who missed that.

As if Zyppan, Ardiis and d00mbros didn't participate in the finals or even the whole masters. Like, while it's acknowledged that certain players did slightly better than others, all of the FPX players made a tonne of jaw-dropping plays throughout the masters.

It's been a long time coming for a team that so well deserved to win the title, and they also happen to equally represent the EU-CIS regions. Let's GO FPX <3

40% HS/18k/+10 for Ange1 on Bind - Holy Captain

Please excuse me, but in what shape or form is Valorant declining? Could you perhaps be more specific and share some further, or more like any, data at all, if possible?

I swear this is getting less and less interesting.

Cough... cough... I've got you covered... It'll spare you some of your so "precious" time looking for proof: https://i.imgur.com/itjNxur.png

Not that the term "fat" is associated with anything too negative... just curious to hear her/him out

Who are you calling here random fats?

^^^ This ... Agree on generalising; it's becoming very evident that certain individuals on here deliberately engage in what they mistakenly believe is still "bantering," but they are either forget or more likely ignorant of the fact that they have long crossed the boundary between bants and pure bullying. It's a W that you brought it up here - such activity only applies to specific people of this site, not the vast majority. And no matter how unexpected as it may sound to some, members must always exercise caution when criticising a rotten sample of the population on here, because the rest of us should almost never be held responsible for whatever nonsense is on the list of "toxic topics" for the day.

Imagine stating that about a player who has 30% HS in 377 rounds on the current masters tour... Given that HS% isn't the most crucial aim component(or?) in mech-skill, you're still out of your mind for saying that.

https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen

No hate ... but maybe you'd have a point if you defined mech-skill or properly backed your argument when comparing three IGL players. Otherwise, not close imho.

^^^This

Feed/troll on teams with subs but when CHAD player checks-in and proceeds slapping them off their HIGH SHELF ... they're all suddenly hurt and asking for mercy... Did anyone from them even bring up mutual understanding or sportsmanship? No, forget that shit ...nobody cares about that when you feel like "FLY HIGH". Nothing new tbfh ... It's just KARMA doing its humbling again. ... DISGUSTING really is

Expected W... no comments really

... >>>VLR "experts"<<< - LMAO ... judging FPX like they know anything about the game - #GRINGE

Mens are chocking on a DAILY ... nothing new here

Actually too CRCKD ... also OP holyyy skills:

https://clips.twitch.tv/AnnoyingGeniusTomatoKappaWealth-MXmLSQEqGUY5R3Jm

Dude if you don't agree with me then just gtfo - no need to get on my nerves here, pulling some weird proofs out of who knows where...

I simply tried to point out where you were wrong in your conclusions on such an such player's superiority compared to other similar players i.e. in smoker or duelist group etc.. but in return you just were being a little dick about it... I even pointed out that being BIASED is totally fine because normally we are all people and we are all biased by nature regarding some topics, however only those daumm precise numbers are going to be able to assist us avoid sliding into various states of biaseness. Yet in your reply you're still trying to convince me that in a world of probability heavy set of events which are conventianally called game/s, you can derive something meaningful by just observing the match or the player and be objectively correct? Well partially, you are correct and that's why I told you that, on here, everyone and their dog watch official live streams as well as some of us, then even have to go and watch those VODS again and again, if needed +analysing different timmings and such within those games... there's really no end to ways of analysing the data, be it visual or written-numeric - whatever. The double type approach of watching and analysing the game will also help to derive a correct conclusion on the situation, teams or the players in question, but not solely on its own without the stats.

Let me tell you again, numbers do play an utterly important role in analysing any probability heavy set of events that kids normally call games... stats especially are important when trying to rank a group of players from a similar or not group. However, as of yet you may not fully understand the meaning of word probability or how you suppose to work with differently dervied data etc but if you keep studying in school or at home, one day you may understand what I meant ;)

Wow, you make it seem like you're the only person here that watch Valorant pro-games live. Like congrats on your delusions, I suppose....
Here's what I really meant, kid: When you just rely on qualitative evidence from games that provide you with a tonne of quantitative evidence/data, you massively lose objectivity when considering the broader picture. Something that looks good for you, doesn't nessecary can be considered good to others, let alone good or priorotised to teams or structure plays.
Being subjective is completely OK, but not when attempting to analyse shit like you're trying to analise here.

In brief, ranking players in games will always involve statistics, whether you want it or not.

Here, let me try to help you clear your biased(doesn't mean bad btw) mind... speaking simply in terms of stats, here are your top smokers in ACS quant rank, starting at the top:

Marved
Boaster
Mako
mindfreak
sScary
pancada
koldamenta
Melser

One or two of the players above have fairly small sample sizes, but considering the range they now fall under in relation to other smokers, I don't think they will change significantly.

https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/1014/valorant-champions-tour-stage-2-masters-copenhagen

Ouch, hits deep... actually