| Flag: | North Korea |
| Registered: | January 13, 2023 |
| Last post: | January 20, 2025 at 6:47 PM |
| Posts: | 4452 |
ye i kinda don't get it tbh. He should've signed some actual good players for probably WAY less than he signed his previous male roster , gotten them to interact with the female cc's the same way he did with his male team (to give gc scene exposure and whatnot), and still make a good run in the circuit. The whole clout/exposure argument doesn't stick at all.
im p sure he could've had an actual cracked team if he just got bob(if she wanted to return), katsumi, katarina +2 .all good, making a content team for gc so doesn't have to pay is kinda clean tbh
https://www.vlr.gg/1724/bonk-vs-boastees-allied-esports-odyssey-qual-2-sf
boastees clears no?
has to be someone's goofy ahh pug team
"best aim in valorant" really isn't a presitigious title tbh there's not much to it
what do you gain from lying on a public forum
machine and spunj, harry and hugo clear every single one of valorant's casters tbf tbh ngl
i think it's something mini (coach) pointed out as well in their icebox map. when chronicle and boaster aren't talking the entire comms just fall dead lol. as info ini to you should be doing some of the most talking on the team too. seems they have good synergy tho, and also it's more abt balancing out comms so they don't get muddled, so if derke chronicle boaster are constantly doing all the info relay, he doesn't really need to talk ig
finally got all the 6 cricket fans in one place
yeee bro kinda got famous off a gimmick im ngl. he's been looking ready to grind tho
jesus christ EG had that man in a chokehold
whoever's alt this is you're funnier here don't go back to your main
hope your barber gave u the bald shave you deserve
@MODS IP ban both him and @Dwighty pls 🙏🙏
peak romcom is Jujustu Kaisen sorry
Even MORE uncertain is all the IQ scores you see attached to famous people online, as these are almost always calculated post-factum, or just straight up wrong, alluding to a lot of "alleged" IQs.
https://www.chessjournal.com/does-chess-require-a-high-iq/ thought i told you to read dummy
when the theater kid somehow gets good at valorant:
.....bruh. Your points are getting circular now.
In Sofia, there existed four Jewish communities in the second half of the 16th century: Romaniote, Ashkenazi, Sephardi and "Ungarus"
Unless there is explicit claim that she is ashkenazi (which proves LITERALLY NOTHING BTW cause avg ashkenazi IQ -> 112-115 (its not that fucking much i.e the IQ of the avg rando chess player-> 110 ) you are pulling this factoid out your ass.
I'm tired of responding to you, as you've made no solid counterpoints (you've literally had the entire day to). Have a nice day!
Intelligence is a trait that hasn't even begun to be characterized properly, as IQ as a metric has clearly been proven to be largely irrelevant in the accurate encapsulation of all the components of intelligence. The tests which are used to calculate these scores are even more uncertain, as most IQ tests have had to have been refined over the years. Even MORE uncertain is all the IQ scores you see attached to famous people online, as these are almost always calculated post-factum, or just straight up wrong, alluding to a lot of "alleged" IQs.
Her IQ is naturally much higher than the IQ of any person in the world. Or cognitive abilities, whatever you want to call it.
Even then, people like Hikaru Nakamura, who scored a 102 on the Mensa Online IQ test (however much weight you would give these online tests comparative to real ones is irrelevant to me, as i consider the very concept to be quite bogus, but it's from the official board, so to claim it isn't substantial is stupid), is literally the 10th ranked highest player in history. Most correlations made between IQ and chess skill have also be repeatedly debunked. This tangent is pointless.
Her IQ is naturally much higher than the IQ of any person in the world. Or cognitive abilities, whatever you want to call it.
This trait is attributed to Ashkenazi Jews, of which there are no explicit records that she was, so your tangent is not only irrelevant but outright incorrect.
I'm afking a lot, and your argument is straight up just leaking into the pretty exhaustive debate on the nature and innateness of intelligence, which i, quite frankly couldn't be bothered to discuss. Either go do something else, or read through and index my points properly before spawning a half-baked refute.
Not to mention they all have high jewish IQ due to genetics
i haven't encountered this level of stupidity before so i'm just gonna ignore this part
What are you on about. She is the exception because she was engineered to be. The entire argument is centered around the point that this engineering is replicable with the average woman. She exists as a reference point in this argument to prove that, not the other way around.
there are no explicit records of an experiment on such a scale as judith's ever being carried out again, as laszlo's work was obviously regarded as unethical. There MAY have been failed attempts at replication, which is why i still consider this hypothesis inconclusive, but it obviously holds more water than saying "oH wOmAn JuSt nO cOmPeTiTivE lOle'".
P.S: mf your edit is proving my point. Judith and Susan Polgar ARE the exceptions that give my postulation substance dumbass
how are they biased??? i literally referenced judith polgar above as someone who was raised apart from these societal norms showing more competitiveness. All the stats available are inconclusive, but our hypothesis has backing proof.
can we let people enjoy things in peace pls
I WILL NOT BE BAITED AGAIN BEGONE YOU DEMON SPAWN
why do you keep saying that but avoiding any rebuttals to the argument? are you fucking braindead? there is no data that alludes to such a conclusive statement as much as it does to any other conclusive statement. It MIGHT be that, as there are SOME stats available that point to a hypothesis of such nature, but all of it is inconclusive. I'm not saying your statement is incorrect, but you just simply CANNOT present it as fact.
Chess has always been and still is a notoriously conservative and traditionalist scene. There are literally OPEN statements from current grandmasters completely disregarding and belittling women in the scene. You literally dont even need that much googling
they literally are heavily disparaged against in the chess community laurus you should be better educated on this. A good lot of the chess community is openly sexist lmao.
It's also funny you mention the chess world, cause there exists a clear example of the fact that if u were to raise women (or at least try your best to, whatever that amts to)apart from these socio-cultural norms they would show more competitveness.
Judith and susan polgar were both raised by their dad (psychologist) to become chess machines i.e this is as close to a controlled environment as we will get, and they both went on to break actual records in the scene, with judith beating fischer's record for youngest GM , and remaining in the top 100 TILL she retired
LMFAOOO BRO I STILL REMEMBER THIS FUCKING 1V1
Discord