cant say i watch everything but ive always kept on at least the player and team statistics of vct cn. also like seeing the comp variety

why do people still glaze cned

gankster u should find teams of all sorts

na my ascendant tournement roster is t5

troop troop :(

.39 800 dpi is a very mid to midhigh sens for pros

ttr x yfp

trade back to apeks for flor

i aint even tryna be a dick but the thread says na imports not americas

stellar (tweeted flag)
bdog (tweeted flag)
wedid (tweeted flag)
add3r (tweeted flag) update

no

stellar tweeted the flag

https://x.com/WedidOfficial/status/1879608679017939408

context https://x.com/WedidOfficial/status/1879608679017939408

this guy wasnt baiting???? https://www.vlr.gg/434098/furia-wedid

wdym does he just be ripping that shit on stream

aidmadeit

link

EKKO DIFF

<3

i just used the same prompt and swapped links idk lol

fuck henbabyh or whatever that fuckers name is

u got a 6.5 for me lol

prompt: https://www.vlr.gg/user/CanadaMan rank this users contributions comoprehensively on this site going through all posts and threads coming to the conclusion of an exact number grading scale of 1-10 are they a positive nontoxic friendly solid member of this community or are they a negative member of the community. long overview and analysis

Based on an extensive review of CanadaMan's contributions on VLR.gg, encompassing over 2,500 posts since their registration on September 8, 2022, it is evident that they are an active and engaged member of the community. Their posts span various topics, including team support, player discussions, and off-topic conversations, reflecting a deep interest in the Valorant scene.

Positive Aspects:

Engagement: CanadaMan frequently initiates and participates in discussions, indicating a commitment to community interaction.

Support for Teams and Players: They express clear support for various teams and players, such as DRG, Zeta, and nAts, contributing to fan-driven discussions.

Humor and Light-Heartedness: Some posts exhibit a sense of humor, adding a light-hearted tone to discussions.

Areas of Concern:

Use of Strong Language: Certain posts contain explicit language and strong expressions of dissatisfaction, particularly towards teams like Liquid.

Negative Sentiments: Expressions such as "FUCK LIQUID" and statements about self-harm, even in a gaming context, may be perceived as negative or concerning by some community members.

Overall Assessment:

While CanadaMan demonstrates enthusiasm and active participation in the VLR.gg community, the use of strong language and negative expressions could be seen as detracting from a wholly positive and friendly presence.

Rating: 6/10

This rating reflects a balance between their active engagement and the occasional use of language or expressions that may not align with community standards for positivity and non-toxicity.

Recommendations for Improvement:

Moderate Language: Adopting more neutral or positive language, especially when expressing dissatisfaction, can enhance community interactions.

Positive Contributions: Focusing on constructive criticism and supportive comments can further solidify their standing as a valued community member.

By addressing these areas, CanadaMan has the potential to elevate their contributions and foster a more positive environment within the VLR.gg community.

dont make me link the top 10 worst users again

math

https://www.vlr.gg/424515/the-worst-vlr-user-an-analysis

H

https://www.vlr.gg/413082/blue-otter-vs-trust-in-plug-challengers-league-2024-north-america-stage-3-decider-d

they just got relegated

0/8

this was a funny game tbh https://www.vlr.gg/220450/edward-gaming-vs-loud-champions-tour-2023-masters-tokyo-lr1

buy a boost or quit probably

me

thought it was just 2 masters one champs?

ig it rethought itself

they made top 4!!

1. Artorias
   Known for repeatedly stirring controversy with inflammatory comments and disdain for community standards. Many users described interactions with Artorias as "despicable" due to divisive arguments and targeted insults​
2. HenBabyH
   Frequently engages in heated debates and personal attacks, which earned them significant backlash. Their abrasive tone has alienated a large part of the community​
3. Simp4S0m
   Criticized for aggressive and often toxic responses. Simp4S0m's confrontational approach has led to significant negative interactions​
4. Azzelastia
   Seen as a contributor to low-quality discourse on the platform. Users frequently blame Azzelastia for reducing the overall intellectual standard of debates​
5. Delusional_Mitch_Fan
   Accused of trolling and posting unnecessary inflammatory content that has aggravated both casual and regular users alike​
6. botfragger432
   Admitted to intentionally baiting certain fanbases (e.g., Indonesian and Indian fans), causing uproar and heated exchanges​
7. meanie
   Regularly involved in polarizing discussions. While their sense of humor appeals to some, their aggressive demeanor alienates others​
8. Average_NA_fan
   Frequently mocked for biased and overly nationalistic commentary, which irritates international fans and escalates regional rivalries​
9. ShadowisBAD
   Once notorious for personal attacks and inflammatory content, though reportedly has moderated their behavior recently​
10. CalypsoGHC
    Often a polarizing figure due to sarcastic remarks and aggressive rebuttals. Their tone remains divisive, though some respect their insights​

i got chat gpt to analyze all users posts across the history of the website and this is its conclusion:

Identifying the most controversial and disliked user on VLR.gg is subjective, as opinions vary among community members. However, based on discussions and feedback from users, one individual who has been frequently mentioned in this context is HenBabyH.
Reasons for Controversy:
Disruptive Behavior: HenBabyH has been noted for consistently disruptive behavior and a negative attitude in discussions. Rather than contributing constructively, they often engage in actions that hinder productive conversations.
VLR.GG
Negative Attitude: Their approach to discussions is often characterized by negativity, which affects the overall tone of the community. This attitude can discourage other users from participating and create a hostile environment.
Lack of Constructive Contribution: Instead of offering valuable insights or engaging in meaningful dialogue, HenBabyH's posts are often seen as unhelpful or inflammatory, leading to frustration among other members.
It's important to note that while these points highlight the reasons for the controversy surrounding HenBabyH, perceptions of users can be subjective and may vary among community members.

i literally just said search this user and tell me if their engagement with the website contradics with this statment with examples. weak bait from them

The forum activity of the user "Pinkdice" on VLR.gg reveals a clear engagement with the competitive Valorant scene and a strong interest in team dynamics, especially related to specific players like Zellsis and Reduxx. Their discussions often revolve around evaluating team rosters, debating player performance, and expressing opinions about Sentinels—a prominent team in Valorant esports.

In contrast, their recent statement dismissing Valorant as "too random to be considered an esport" and claiming there's "no point investing time into any of their tournaments" contradicts this historical pattern of deep involvement. For example, they have actively debated team changes and predicted outcomes, such as whether Zellsis will stay with Sentinels or if Reduxx will take over, showing a vested interest in the competitive scene's development​
VLR.GG
​
VLR.GG
.

Their frequent posts in team-centric discussions—like questioning strategic decisions or evaluating the impact of new player signings—indicate a level of engagement inconsistent with their claim of disinterest. Even while criticizing some aspects of the esport (e.g., Zellsis being labeled a "vibes merchant"), their comments reveal a nuanced understanding of the game's competitive landscape, further emphasizing their prior commitment​
VLR.GG
.

This shift from active discussion to outright dismissal may stem from frustration, potentially due to recent disappointments in competitive results or perceived issues with the game’s structure. However, the intensity and frequency of their past interactions suggest that their claim of disinterest might not fully reflect their long-standing investment in the Valorant esports scene.

exactly

to say johnqt didnt preform is fair but youre fucking braindead cherry picking these stats and youre dumb stupid and also fat

top 2 sen players rating, very positive kd across all matches, top 6 statistically in the entire tourney. youre schizo cherrypicking fuck off

are you schizo? to say both is criminal n4rrate can play anything

https://www.vlr.gg/user/Kesslera

ancient ass games

yes this is chat gpt go fuck yourself

This is an important and nuanced topic that spans biology, neuroscience, psychology, and sociology. Let’s explore the scientific basis behind being transgender and the current state of research.

1. Brain Structure and Neurological Evidence
   Several studies suggest that certain aspects of brain anatomy and function in transgender individuals may align more closely with their identified gender than their assigned gender at birth. Examples include:

White Matter Microstructure: A 2011 study found that white matter microstructure in transgender women (assigned male at birth) resembled that of cisgender women more than cisgender men, particularly in areas associated with gender identity and body perception【1】.

Cortical Thickness: A 2015 meta-analysis observed differences in cortical thickness and brain activity that appear to align with an individual's experienced gender rather than their assigned sex at birth【2】.

Functional Connectivity: Studies on functional brain connectivity during tasks and at rest show patterns in transgender individuals that correlate with their gender identity【3】.

However, these findings are not yet definitive. While they show promising correlations, brain structure alone cannot fully determine gender identity, as the brain is influenced by complex interactions between genetics, hormones, and social factors.

2. Genetics and Hormones
   Genetic Studies: Preliminary research suggests that certain genetic markers may be associated with transgender identity. For instance, variations in genes involved in sex hormone signaling (e.g., androgen receptor genes) have been proposed as contributing factors【4】. However, these studies are limited and often lack replication, making this an area requiring further exploration.

Prenatal Hormonal Environment: Hormones during fetal development are believed to play a critical role in shaping gender identity. For example:

Variations in exposure to androgens (male hormones) in utero may influence brain development in ways that align more with one gender than another【5】.
Some studies on animal models suggest that altering hormonal environments during critical developmental windows can affect sexual and social behavior, providing indirect support for hormonal influence on gender identity.

3. Psychosocial Factors
   Social and environmental influences are also significant. Research highlights how societal expectations, cultural norms, and individual experiences can shape gender identity and expression.

Childhood Development: The development of gender identity often begins early in life, with most children showing a strong sense of their gender by age 3-5. For some transgender individuals, this sense persists despite social or familial pressures to conform to their assigned gender.

Minority Stress: Transgender individuals often face discrimination, stigma, and marginalization, which can impact mental health. While these factors don't determine gender identity, they underscore the importance of understanding transgender experiences in a broader sociocultural context【6】.

4. Criticisms and Challenges in Research
   While the evidence is growing, there are challenges in transgender research:

Sample Size and Diversity: Many studies have small sample sizes and may not adequately represent the diversity of transgender experiences (e.g., nonbinary individuals or those outside Western cultural contexts).

Causation vs. Correlation: It’s difficult to distinguish whether observed differences in brain structure or function cause transgender identity or are the result of living as a transgender individual in a particular society.

Ethics and Bias: Some critiques argue that focusing too heavily on biological explanations risks pathologizing transgender identities or setting a "biological standard" for validity.

5. Why Might There Be No "Solid Foundation"?
   Complex Interplay of Factors: Gender identity is shaped by biological, psychological, and social factors, making it difficult to isolate a single "cause."
   Relatively New Field: Transgender research is a comparatively new area of study. The scientific community continues to explore the topic with more sophisticated tools and methods.
   Societal Attitudes: Historically, research on gender and sexuality has been shaped by cultural biases, which may have delayed objective investigations.
6. Conclusion and Future Directions
   The current scientific consensus supports the idea that transgender identities have biological, neurological, and psychosocial underpinnings, although no single factor fully explains them. Studies point to a complex interplay of genetics, hormones, brain structure, and social factors. While the field is advancing, it remains under-researched compared to other areas of human health and behavior.

If you’d like to explore peer-reviewed research directly, let me know, and I can link specific studies.

References
Rametti, G., et al. (2011). "The microstructure of white matter in male to female transsexuals before cross-sex hormonal treatment." Journal of Psychiatric Research.
Guillamon, A., et al. (2016). "A review of the status of brain structure research in transsexualism." Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Manzouri, A., et al. (2017). "Structural connectivity networks in the brains of transgender individuals." Scientific Reports.
Hare, L., et al. (2009). "Androgen receptor repeat length polymorphism associated with male-to-female transsexualism." Biological Psychiatry.
Hines, M. (2011). "Gender development and the human brain." Annual Review of Neuroscience.
Meyer, I. H. (2003). "Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence." Psychological Bulletin.