To quote your linked article: "However, that sex difference in reaction time is likely an artifact caused by using the same force threshold in women as men" - As the article itself explains theyre talking about "response time" and not reaction ("which is the sum of the premotor time, the electromechanical delay, and the time required to generate a given foot force against the starting block") and heavily incorperate on the force aspect for their argumentation. How do the differences in Spatial Ability scale when it comes to small movements like in esports?
Theres also the problem with using sprints as a source for reaction based research since the correlation between reaction time and results isnt generally accepted. From https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2013/04000/reaction_time_aspects_of_elite_sprinters_in.3.aspx (an article in favor of correlation): "Mero et al. (16) and Smirniotou et al. (20) reported no correlation between reaction time and performance level. Delalija et al. (9) observed a significant correlation [...]".
But most importantly the article I linked concludes " that male athletes younger than 18 years had a significantly longer reaction time (0.170 ± 0.031 seconds) (p < 0.01) than the other age groups [of male athletes]". 26–29 years is the "optimal" age according to their numbers with "0.150 ± 0.017 seconds". The >18 year olds RT is a whole 0.017 longer than more than 30 year old females ("0.153 ± 0.020 seconds").
Would this be a conclusion you agree with by looking at Valorant or CS pro players? Is the scene dominated by 26-29 year olds because they have a significant (up to 0.02 seconds!) biological advantage over their younger competition?