Turkish valorant died quickly

#1

Mdkns

It’s kinda crazy how bad some of the Turkish teams have gotten

#2

DDenied

9

Frags

+

–

they haven't really changed tbh

#3

GLN321

-1

Frags

+

–

they never were that good realistically tho. They peaked when SMB made masters berlin and even then, they kinda sucked, and they only qualified because emea was on a bad point asides from Gambit

#6

wohe

11

Frags

+

–

SMB won against prx and smoked half of eu don't shit talk them like that they were unlucky that they faced acend twice but SMB was probably better than all regions except for NA and EU

#13

GLN321

0

Frags

+

–

Like I said, emea was in a bad point back then asides from Gambit, and if they didn't play against Acend they would've lost against VS anyways, you have to admit their LAN performance was pretty bad

#18

wohe

2

Frags

+

–

what does EMEA was in a bad point mean, EMEA smoked Na in masters bruh bruuuh, and they only played acend twice to get out of groups unfortunately, u literally said they were never that good and i'm telling you compared to every other region aside from NA they were clearly better BR included

#26

GLN321

0

Frags

+

–

Again, asides from Gambit, all emea teams underperformed. G2 went 1-1 against Sentinels (everyone acts like this was insane when SEN clearly were in deline) and then got 13-0'd. Acend lost to 100T. SMB did badly objectively. SMB definitely was not better than VS at masters berlin either. I don't know what are your expectations for EMEA teams, but saying they were better than everyone asides from other EMEA and NA, doesn't mean they were good. It is the expectations for an EMEA team to beat those other teams.

#28

Hewcho

0

Frags

+

–

if we are talking about berlin yeah gambit was so good but i wanna ad that gambit only played at the finals vs good team, they lost to 100t but that was not something special "for me" that they are good (100t). In champions gambit was not that good i think, they played vs underdog teams in group stage and almost lost vs brazilian team (forgot the name) and gave all the teams 1 map. KRU was so good yes, they managed to win vs them but in the other hand acend was shitting on everyone and won the finals (acend 13-0d gambit too in redbull) i see so many vlr users saying "acend winning champions was fluke" it's not.

#30

GLN321

0

Frags

+

–

I agree that 100T wasn't anything that special at masters berlin but I just said it bc u said emea "smoked" na that event when in reality only gambit smoked envy. I agree about gambit in champs, they were already showing weaknesses in the other events like redbull homegrounds and they were shaky on champs aswell. Acend was great in champs asides from the first game which was close, but in masters 3 it was different

#31

Hewcho

0

Frags

+

–

okay

#20

PrTsty

1

Frags

+

–

SMB was ultra bad at masters, they were great in challengers 3 tho

#24

Sprouts

3

Frags

+

–

VS would’ve smoked them in Berlin too though, only reason they played ACE twice was because VS got 1st seed

#29

asdfgh

0

Frags

+

–

im sorry but literally the most fluke run in the history of valorant,how can anyone even deny it at this point,even when they were good it was just all aim no brain 60 ping vandal xantarespeek,once they got to lan they instantly got shit on by acend and almost lost to prx

#4

Mbappe

3

Frags

+

–

Their teams aren't that special. But they have some great individuals. Like Alfajer and Deepmans are 16 and already pretty good

#5

wohe

-4

Frags

+

–

japan should suck rito's cock every day for the slot imo

#7

Tokyo777

3

Frags

+

–

kinda cringe

#9

wohe

0

Frags

+

–

cringe but true, can't deny that

#10

orqn

-2

Frags

+

–

fr tho TR and CIS deserve their own spot in Masters

#21

PrTsty

1

Frags

+

–

It would just cut the competition for both regions, whats the point. Especially for CIS, they can compete with eu teams. Their region has so few players

#25

orqn

0

Frags

+

–

It would make Masters more interesting. NAVI, for example, would have a good chance to dominate in Masters, but they don't get a spot in Masters because EMEA is so stacked.

#8

Tokyo777

0

Frags

+

–

btw he is not from jp

#14

queueK

0

Frags

+

–

no shit, sherlock

#11

kamesyos

0

Frags

+

–

Bro turkish teams just not so good against Eu teams and thats mostly because of tactics. That is a classic Turkish gaming problem and Eu is so good at it , that is why Eu teams are mostly better. But it would be definetly different if we would have our own spot like Japan or Brazil

#12

wohe

1

Frags

+

–

do u understand that if ur playing through EMEA regions like APAC BR and everyone else except NA would disappear

#15

queueK

-1

Frags

+

–

"except NA" OMEGALUL

#19

wohe

2

Frags

+

–

truth at the time

#16

Caskilitonnotilik

0

Frags

+

–

TR > 10000000X JP stfu

#17

emraaa

0

Frags

+

–

Pretty much every team beside the NA teams would struggle in EMEA.

#22

ChrisPewPew

1

Frags

+

–

they havent made the right teams yet tho
many good players avaiable but in different teams
example: Lauress, cned , deepmans, sterben , masic , sociable, alfajer , jlerst , turko , aslan , aimddl , quti , qw1 , mojj , izzy , brave and xistou

BBL is good but paura is not performing

#23

ChrisPewPew

0

Frags

+

–

you can make like 3 turkish super teams but only bbl is kind of a super team and the rest of the decent teams only have 2-3 top players frim the region

#27

Chovymaker

0

Frags

+

–

cNed
Sterben
Brave
pAura/XiSTOU
Russz
hey, build this team and sit back

#32

Nays

0

Frags

+

–

cned's level is too high, i think deepmans could be better