0

Challengers in EMEA feedback form

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
BoDork

Hello VLR, BoDumb here!

I quickly wanted to share a feedback form we've created regarding Challengers in EMEA, please fill it out if you have the time for it as it can help us and Riot immensely to identify what's good and what needs to be improved upon.

You are also welcome to share your thoughts in this thread

Link to form: https://forms.gle/W671vaCmh4MtRh6k8
(This thread was approved by a VLR staff member)

#2
kfan4238173
0
Frags
+

not doing all that but better format pls because 2nd best team was eliminated after 1 loss

#8
composthe
0
Frags
+

2nd best team won the tournament

1st best team played final and lost

#9
kfan4238173
-1
Frags
+

eternal fart lose by 2 maps to pcf

enterprise lose by just 1 🤫

#10
composthe
0
Frags
+

they had 2 bans against us ofc it wasnt even close

you guys were able to ban your perma ban

#3
babysasuke
1
Frags
+

virus link

#4
BoDork
1
Frags
+

Can confirm I accidentally clicked the Zellsis Crypto link

#6
babysasuke
0
Frags
+

how do you feel about Zellsis saying slurs and attacking women on twitter

#5
lakpx
0
Frags
+

guy from twitter

#7
Congo1
1
Frags
+

Great idea to do a champions league type format where the individual leagues tie into a european tournament instead of just fusing the leagues into one. That would have been dreadful. Also getting so much more play between the best teams of the regions instead of just ascension at the end of the year is 100% more interesting. Both for viewer experience and level of competition increasing.

However the seeding is an obvious problem. Thats probably not a crazy revelation to you but 4 spots to northeast and 2 to turkey makes little sense. generally seeds should be spread out as much as possible. The lower you go the quicker the quality decreases. Like metizport was dreadful. Genuinely.

Wanted to blast off my initial thoughts immediately but might add something on the edit later if i think of something. For now i am very positive about the event.

#13
targuin
2
Frags
+

Thats probably not a crazy revelation to you but 4 spots to northeast and 2 to turkey makes little sense.

We are being VERY reactionary here.

You are currently judging a region which started their teambuilding way later than the others (due to factors outside of the teams control) for not doing well in the first of 3 internationals.

Punishing a newly formed region for having a slow start is nonsensical.

#14
Galactc
2
Frags
+

Also north//east is composed of far more than Turkey of course they have more slots

#15
Congo1
0
Frags
+

well at the end of the day fener has at least 50% chance vs any northeast seed. I think 3 seeds for each is fair. Metizport didnt need to be here

#11
Shadow_Monarch
1
Frags
+

Good luck making it more exciting for viewers and fans.

#12
targuin
0
Frags
+

Didnt really fit anywhere in the form so imma just drop it here:

The schedule as a whole needs to be drawn out more (and I have no clue how youd do it so gl). We've seen plently of complaints about various formats (bo1s, bo2s and dach playing like 3 games) which I assume are caused by time crunch.
And now the international itself was plagued by it, with the group stage being very short and "random" as such (1 loss can mean elimination). With a bit extra time a swiss (or even just tad larger groups) would have been possible and mitigated a lot of the seeding concerns others have voiced.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment