1

thoughts on igl role change

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
baroque

recently a lot of igls have been making the transition from smokes/senti to initiator roles. obviously there is the argument that initiators are more "with the pack" and thus will lead to better calling, but i think the uncomfortableness on the role is doing more harm than good. for some igls there is some sense (fns has marved/som and saadhak had pancada/tuyz so they can both flex well and call) but for others it just ends up with the johnqt/narrate issue.

i feel like the role switches aren't necessary, a championship winning team can have an igl that plays a lurk/controller/senti playstyle. pretty much the same number of internationals these past few years were won by an ini/flex igl

flex igl:
munchkin geng
nobody edg
saadhak loud
fenis optic
redcar gambit

"traditional" igls:
boaster fnatic
johnqt sentinels
boostio eg
angel fpx

discuss

#2
BME_JERRYCHAPULIN
0
Frags
+

Fl1pzjder He Play Yoru And Jett

#3
Galactc
0
Frags
+

They should be playing the role they are already playing this role switch shit the na teams have been doing is going to backfire on them

#4
Azzelastia
1
Frags
+

Boostio is flex

#6
bobwoblob
1
Frags
+

True but he won champs IGL'ing from senti. Although he wasn't a lurker since they already had c0m for that.

#5
Shuaaaa
0
Frags
+

IMO senti/controller work best. I think initiators should work really closely w/ the duelists to set them up, but the more passive the role, the better for calling. As long as the rest of the team gives good comms.

#7
bobwoblob
0
Frags
+

johnqt/narrate have only tried it for one off season event? It can still work out and they could always try a zellsis/narrate role swap anyway.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment