Xi Lai 2-1
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
322 | 26 | / 10 / | 5 | +16 | ||||||||
|
231 | 16 | / 15 / | 14 | +1 | ||||||||
|
217 | 17 | / 18 / | 4 | -1 | ||||||||
|
127 | 10 | / 15 / | 17 | -5 | ||||||||
|
96 | 6 | / 14 / | 18 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
329 | 27 | / 14 / | 3 | +13 | ||||||||
|
257 | 20 | / 17 / | 3 | +3 | ||||||||
|
122 | 7 | / 14 / | 8 | -7 | ||||||||
|
114 | 10 | / 14 / | 14 | -4 | ||||||||
|
107 | 8 | / 16 / | 6 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
239 | 47 | / 40 / | 9 | +7 | ||||||||
|
206 | 39 | / 46 / | 8 | -7 | ||||||||
|
190 | 35 | / 45 / | 20 | -10 | ||||||||
|
122 | 18 | / 43 / | 30 | -25 | ||||||||
|
110 | 18 | / 45 / | 32 | -27 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
286 | 55 | / 36 / | 10 | +19 | ||||||||
|
263 | 56 | / 34 / | 10 | +22 | ||||||||
|
251 | 43 | / 28 / | 20 | +15 | ||||||||
|
175 | 33 | / 33 / | 27 | 0 | ||||||||
|
156 | 31 | / 26 / | 35 | +5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
194 | 9 | / 13 / | 1 | -4 | ||||||||
|
180 | 7 | / 14 / | 2 | -7 | ||||||||
|
139 | 7 | / 14 / | 1 | -7 | ||||||||
|
129 | 5 | / 14 / | 4 | -9 | ||||||||
|
98 | 4 | / 14 / | 3 | -10 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
426 | 23 | / 8 / | 3 | +15 | ||||||||
|
304 | 15 | / 5 / | 6 | +10 | ||||||||
|
202 | 11 | / 9 / | 2 | +2 | ||||||||
|
172 | 11 | / 4 / | 6 | +7 | ||||||||
|
168 | 9 | / 6 / | 10 | +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
216 | 14 | / 16 / | 2 | -2 | ||||||||
|
206 | 13 | / 15 / | 3 | -2 | ||||||||
|
200 | 12 | / 16 / | 5 | -4 | ||||||||
|
140 | 7 | / 15 / | 8 | -8 | ||||||||
|
106 | 4 | / 16 / | 12 | -12 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
326 | 21 | / 9 / | 6 | +12 | ||||||||
|
257 | 18 | / 11 / | 5 | +7 | ||||||||
|
249 | 16 | / 11 / | 11 | +5 | ||||||||
|
181 | 10 | / 8 / | 15 | +2 | ||||||||
|
176 | 12 | / 11 / | 4 | +1 |
Don't let the 2-1 scoreline of their most recent encounter fool you, because while DRG took the first map 13-10, they only managed to scrape by 5 rounds in the two following maps. With Rarga and other XLG players performing at a high level as of late, maybe it's time for DRG to put some more oil on the lamp and regain that strong form we saw in Stage 1.
Tough one, but I think DRG takes this.
DRG 2-0 XLG