Na ranked vs eu ranked

why is there such a difference in the number of immos in eu its always full at 15k but na has such a lower number of immos and radiants

na is trash imo

i think its just a ladder thing,

i dont actually believe that the number of people in immo inherently makes eu or na better just that the ascendents in NA are more often than not playing actual immos on rankups and not people their elo so it creates a wall for immo here

i fell from immortal to asc2 team mvping every other map and play just about the same amount of immortals

Last acts in NA there was around 10-15k immos but now it's around 5k and it's either due to people dropping to ascendant or th quitting valorant or could be both.

NA is the hardest and most competitive region.

I can’t speak for everyone but I personally have noticed the quality of my games have dropped substantially with episode 9. I think all of the low immortal players got so fed up with the resets that many aren’t trying to climb up because they’re still playing the same people despite being in Ascendant. It’s like half the leaderboard was just demoted a rank but they’re still playing the same — just with less motivation to climb.

It’s bound to happen when the reward is just a buddy that you’ve already collected from prior episodes. Radiant is too far off for the average immortal player and the gap that starts between 100rr to 200rr explodes around 400rr. What’s the point to grinding it all out for the same reward?

I really wanna see those rank distribution charts because I’m pretty sure more than half of the players that were in immortal dropped to Ascendant and just stayed there.

Idk but im always seein 130 ping eus in my lobies so i assume its because we have the better players.