Based on recent performances at the Valorant Champions 2024, there are several critical points that suggest Fnatic might benefit from replacing Boaster to improve their chances of future success.
Performance Metrics :
Kill-Death Ratio (K/D): Boaster's K/D ratio during the tournament was significantly lower compared to his teammates. In the match against G2, Boaster had 12 kills and 23 deaths, resulting in a K/D ratio of 0.52 .This is far below the team's average, with players like Alfajer and Derke achieving 44-23 and 41-23 K/D ratios, respectively.
Average Combat Score (ACS): Boaster's ACS was notably lower at 54.2, compared to his teammates who often had ACS scores above 150. This lower ACS indicates that Boaster is not contributing as effectively in engagements .
First Kills (FK) and First Deaths (FD): Boaster's impact in early engagements is minimal, with a negative first kill to first death ratio (-6). This indicates that he is often the first to die in rounds, putting Fnatic at an early disadvantage.
Average Damage per Round (ADR): Boaster's ADR of 54.2 is much lower than the team average, highlighting his lack of impact in terms of damage dealt to opponents.
Negative effects of having boster on team :
1)Team Morale and Synergy: Consistent underperformance by any team member can affect overall team morale and synergy. High-pressure situations demand peak performance from all members, and Boaster's current stats indicate a gap that could be filled by a player with stronger individual skills.
2)Opportunity Cost: By maintaining Boaster in the roster, Fnatic may be missing out on other talented players who could bring more firepower and strategic depth. Given the competitive nature of the Valorant scene, every roster spot is crucial for maximizing team potential.
Discord