How is fut 6-1?

#1

HasosP

They didn't played 7 games can somebody please explain?

#2

TheLoque

4

Frags

+

–

actually they did... it carries over from stage 1 regulars

#5

HasosP

-7

Frags

+

–

Brainrot format

#7

TheLoque

3

Frags

+

–

ummm why? scores against every other teams (round robin) is the great format

or are you salty sentinels only have, what, 3 wins?

#8

nobody___100

1

Frags

+

–

no, you dumbass, it means that even if teams rebuild/reinvent themselves or even go complete roster changes between stages, they still might have a hard chance
look at furia for example, beating 0thieves but got no chance at playoffs

#9

TheLoque

3

Frags

+

–

okay... so the management did a shitty job at the start of the season... champs rewards teams who put up great performance throughout the season... tough luck to them then womp womp

#10

heavensentsaint

-1

Frags

+

–

lmao u can just win all ur games in stage 1 and lose everything in stage 2 and still qual for playoffs, u def dont get rewarded for "putting great performance throughout the season"

#11

TheLoque

-1

Frags

+

–

oh so losing all games in stage 1 then winning all games in stage 2 is WAY WORSE than winning then losing???
the inconsistency.... is laughable :)))

#14

heavensentsaint

-1

Frags

+

–

yes it rewards inconsistent teams r u retarded and discourages teams from making mid season changes

#16

ark2

0

Frags

+

–

making stage 2 results more valuable than stage 1 wins makes stage 1 way less relevant, like what’s the point of trying in stage 1 if the records get wiped for stage 2? teams making mid-season changes need to deal with their poor performances in stage 1 and look to bounce back next year, any other way is categorically unfair

#17

heavensentsaint

0

Frags

+

–

trying in stage 1 rewards you for making playoffs for masters...?

especially with how often the meta changes, my point is a team can completely shit the bed in stage 2 and get carried by their stage 1 record, i dont see how thats rewarding consistency

continue thread →

#19

Number1Joshie

2

Frags

+

–

In an esports ecosystem, a year is a long time to sit on your hands. But riot caused all this due to franchising

I wish val was on an open circuit format instead with tourneys across the world similar to cs:go, its so much more entertaining and teams don't end up in the street for 8months if they have a bad split. having teams do nothing for extended periods of time is how you build resentment with orgs imo

#15

nobody___100

2

Frags

+

–

its because in the past, teams like kru have gone on miracle LCQ runs after an 0-9 regular season to go to champs
now, its impossible.

#12

K4ziuHa

0

Frags

+

–

a different format would take away stage 1 accomplishments

#18

sm1th0o

0

Frags

+

–

just make 2 separate tournaments. The stage 1 accomplishments were the champions points and chance to go to Masters. With this format rn you just kill the competition halfway through it

#21

TheLoque

0

Frags

+

–

so with 11 teams and every team played at least once a week, you're saying we should have at least 10 weeks stages for each masters and champs????? to help with your math, 10 weeks is 2 months, potentially 3 months long tournament....

#22

sm1th0o

0

Frags

+

–

It doesn't have to be 1 game per week but if it is it would still be better since there are teams that go through 6~7 months without any game

#23

TheLoque

0

Frags

+

–

"wait, there are!?!?!? wow what a shit team that is" is what most people would say... ever think maybe they really do deserved to not be able to play that long because of their bad performances???

#24

sm1th0o

0

Frags

+

–

no they don't deserve since it's their vocation and the orgs are losing money just to keep them inactive

continue thread →

#13

sm1th0o

0

Frags

+

–

+1

#3

var1ance

0

Frags

+

–

overall lil bro

#4

n1cf

1

Frags

+

–

stage 1 games carries over to stage 2

#6

Kyronnn

0

Frags

+

–

it was their record from the last split + their KOI game.