How tf switzerland won
I thought they were gonna come like last
every year all the european countries send a representative and they compete who has the best song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXwgZL4zx9o&ab_channel=EurovisionSongContest
"we are just DISCUSSING the INFLUENCE of POLITICS in eurovision
and we are discussing concrete events? no opinions, no politics!!!!!!!!!"
r u stupid or just brainwashed??
you said we are discussing the influence of politics in eurovision then you say u aren't discussing politics.
the obvious contradiction is crazy
again
a human who lacks the ability of critical thinking and civilised discussing.
you dont even know what politics is man
how is discussing the impact of politics in eurovision
the same as having a political discussion/debate
political discussion: 2 parts disagreeing
discussing the politics influence: 2 parts discussing how it impacted
like ur so rude and u clearly lack the brains to back it up
okay ur just trolling now
my point was valid
you said i only used ad hominem when i PROVED that majority of the text in my post was an legit argument but you just choose to ignore that and focus on the part where i called u stupid (because you dont have a counter argument sadge go read a book (if you know how to read(doenst seem like it)))
your just making another argumentative fallacy
try and make a post without one and you might be worthy of a response
"again
a human who lacks the ability of critical thinking and civilised discussing.
you dont even know what politics is man
how is discussing the impact of politics in eurovision
the same as having a political discussion/debate
political discussion: 2 parts disagreeing
discussing the politics influence: 2 parts discussing how it impacted
like ur so rude and u clearly lack the brains to back it up"
2nd and 3rd line: ad homenims.
4th and 5th: ur putting words in my mouth that I never said. I never said it was a political discussion/ debate but I rather just said that you are talking about politics (mentioning politics which does not mean having a discussion or debate about politics).
this sentence is not an argument in itself but is rather a question and ur using the false dilemma fallacy by suggesting that I said "the impact of politics in eurovision is the same as having a political discussion/debate" when I didn't and therefor I might not agree or disagree with that statement.
6th and 7th: not an argument nor ad hominem as ur just reiterating the parts of the previous discussion.
8th: ad hominem:
conc.
every single point u made was an ad hominem and so ur whole "argument" was only ad homonyms and no points that weren't attacking my character were addressed.