Ez for Luckerrr
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.07 1.02 1.12 | 191 209 177 | 15 7 8 | / 13 9 4 / | 6 2 4 | +2 -2 +4 | 68% 50% 83% | 122 125 119 | 29% 31% 28% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.96 0.51 1.33 | 169 114 217 | 11 3 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 16 5 11 | -6 -7 +1 | 68% 60% 75% | 134 95 167 | 25% 25% 25% | 3 0 3 | 1 1 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.90 0.62 1.14 | 197 160 229 | 14 5 9 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 59% 40% 75% | 143 113 169 | 21% 50% 16% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.82 0.51 1.08 | 145 105 179 | 13 4 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 3 3 | -2 -5 +3 | 73% 70% 75% | 96 68 120 | 24% 27% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.71 0.38 0.98 | 164 79 236 | 12 2 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -7 +2 | 59% 60% 58% | 97 56 131 | 22% 40% 15% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 0.85 2.22 | 265 149 406 | 20 6 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 9 3 6 | +6 -3 +9 | 73% 50% 100% | 186 120 265 | 24% 25% 23% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.28 1.30 1.26 | 194 182 210 | 16 7 9 | / 12 8 4 / | 11 9 2 | +4 -1 +5 | 77% 75% 80% | 137 139 135 | 19% 28% 11% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.03 0.75 1.36 | 207 138 290 | 15 5 10 | / 14 8 6 / | 10 3 7 | +1 -3 +4 | 73% 50% 100% | 142 94 200 | 25% 33% 21% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.99 0.86 1.14 | 151 192 103 | 14 10 4 | / 12 10 2 / | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | 73% 50% 100% | 102 123 76 | 48% 60% 17% | 3 2 1 | 4 4 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.96 0.79 1.17 | 148 121 181 | 13 5 8 | / 13 9 4 / | 7 2 5 | 0 -4 +4 | 82% 75% 90% | 92 72 116 | 17% 19% 16% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.02 1.12 1.07 | 191 209 177 | 15 7 8 | / 13 9 4 / | 6 2 4 | +2 -2 +4 | 68% 50% 83% | 122 125 119 | 29% 31% 28% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.51 1.33 0.96 | 169 114 217 | 11 3 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 16 5 11 | -6 -7 +1 | 68% 60% 75% | 134 95 167 | 25% 25% 25% | 3 0 3 | 1 1 0 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.62 1.14 0.90 | 197 160 229 | 14 5 9 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -4 +2 | 59% 40% 75% | 143 113 169 | 21% 50% 16% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.51 1.08 0.82 | 145 105 179 | 13 4 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 3 3 | -2 -5 +3 | 73% 70% 75% | 96 68 120 | 24% 27% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.38 0.98 0.71 | 164 79 236 | 12 2 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -7 +2 | 59% 60% 58% | 97 56 131 | 22% 40% 15% | 4 1 3 | 2 2 0 | +2 -1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.85 2.22 1.47 | 265 149 406 | 20 6 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 9 3 6 | +6 -3 +9 | 73% 50% 100% | 186 120 265 | 24% 25% 23% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.30 1.26 1.28 | 194 182 210 | 16 7 9 | / 12 8 4 / | 11 9 2 | +4 -1 +5 | 77% 75% 80% | 137 139 135 | 19% 28% 11% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.75 1.36 1.03 | 207 138 290 | 15 5 10 | / 14 8 6 / | 10 3 7 | +1 -3 +4 | 73% 50% 100% | 142 94 200 | 25% 33% 21% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.86 1.14 0.99 | 151 192 103 | 14 10 4 | / 12 10 2 / | 2 0 2 | +2 0 +2 | 73% 50% 100% | 102 123 76 | 48% 60% 17% | 3 2 1 | 4 4 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.79 1.17 0.96 | 148 121 181 | 13 5 8 | / 13 9 4 / | 7 2 5 | 0 -4 +4 | 82% 75% 90% | 92 72 116 | 17% 19% 16% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
They will be stronger with luckeRRR as their main duelist compared to kAdavraa? Support players can't help that much when they don't have a star player to support. kAda is one of the best duelists in EU and replacing him with Zik and Seider and moving luckeRRR back to jett(where he was super inconsistent on NiP) isn't going to make them stronger whatsoever.