Tuned into his stream and just saw this live :
https://clips.twitch.tv/CourageousAmazonianDolphinAliens-awXtxNuU8BuQu2mL
Tuned into his stream and just saw this live :
https://clips.twitch.tv/CourageousAmazonianDolphinAliens-awXtxNuU8BuQu2mL
See.... that would work normally if he had actually cooperated with the investigation in any aspect. Instead he got his suspension extended because he refused to provide the full video as promised and was just generally uncooperative with Riot/the investigation.
So like yeah... it's not a good look for him and I would caution everyone from saying shit like the original comment because it sounds like a real dick thing to say to someone who may have actually been assaulted by him
I mean A) the police were involved and B) He literally posted a twitlonger stating he would hand over the full video/audio clip unedited to authorities (I'm pretty sure it was just the audio they were after but i can't remember specifically). He then obviously went on to do the opposite and got himself an extended suspension for not being helpful at all during the investgation in both attiude and in providing what he said he would.
It could be anything why he wouldn't cooperate as #12 said. We have seen this play out before when HenryG and RedEye was both accused on twitter and both of their accusations were liars but still got their careers and lives destroyed. I would say the jury is still out and no reason to paint him as a former convict when he isn't proven guilty.
I understand your point and trust me if I was painting him as a literal rapist I would be condemning anything and everything to do with him. As it is now, I'm just saying that people need to be aware of the current facts and not say something so abbrassive as what OP said. You need to realise that whilse he's not proven guilty, he's also not proven innocent and shouldn't be treated as such. Also regardless of him being uncooperative his main point in his intial response to the accusation was providing proof that he didn't do it which he then failed to provide. His LITERAL MAIN POINT in his response was about this audio clip and how he would provide the full thing with context and then he decides not too?