#1

TrialRunnr

Ranking teams from most Fraudulent to least.

Acend : needed a rematch with a 7 round lead just to beat Keyd Stars in their first game, cant get more fraudulent than this, further proof is just look at where the players are now, all washed.
Sentinels: played against plumbers and mechanics in a meta where Tenz go kill was the best strat.
Fpx: Prx literally gifted them the final by trolling wouldnt have won otherwise, proof is current NAVI: added another fraud to previously existing 4 frauds and you get the most Fraudulent team in LA Champs also Drug abusers
Fnatic : Only team with 2 titles despite 1 being a mickey mouse and are favourites for Champs, will bump them to 4 if they dont win Champs tho. (I have seen the light, they are only winning cus the competition is not what it used to be, Fraud team.)

------------ tierbreak (the teams mentioned below arent really frauds and are well deseving of their titles.) ------------

Gambit: I am convinced Rito got paid by Gambit to not get their players PC checked, proof: as soon as the players lost Gambits backing they couldnt even make another international lan. so basically Cheaters but couldnt even win against Acend while cheating. (no proof yet so I give them the benefit of the doubt)
LOUD : The first super team Valo had and they delivered, 3 finals and 1 Champs. Cant argue with the consistency cus as we learnt from above Frauds cant be consistent.
Optic : Most consistent team in Valo history with 3 finals and multiple top 4 finishes. Again cant argue with the consistency.

This list is based on pure evidence and facts so dont even bother arguing otherwise.

Edit: Changed Fnatic from 7th to 4th. Might swap aroung LOUD and Optic too depending on this tourney despite how much I love Optic.

#2

Qwerttyy

-22

Frags

+

–

flukenatic are bigger flukers than anyone, they did it twice

#3

TrialRunnr

-4

Frags

+

–

good argument tbh, will bump them up to 4 if they dont win Champs.

#50

sentinelmain377

-2

Frags

+

–

bro why are u mixing up being consistent in all time valorant with having a fluke win???

like we all know Optic has been really good at a lot of events and so they are NOT a fluke team. but have a kind of flukey win,
cuz the event they won the tournament, EMEA wasnt there with full strength (FPX visa issues, FNC 2 subs)

also Gambit wasnt cheating. They worked 12 hours a day for the Berlin win

#53

TrialRunnr

2

Frags

+

–

you are unironically the most braindead user on this site so I am not gonna take your opinion seriously

#5

dexter000111

16

Frags

+

–

had my grandma play valorant in bronze today, she fell asleep and accidentally hit left mouse button and got a kill

#26

azureblade101

5

Frags

+

–

you should let your grandma play for 100t more often

#9

moatz

0

Frags

+

–

🗣️🗣️🗣️

#4

cobalt21312

11

Frags

+

–

sen run isnt a fluke, they dominated valorant at that time

#8

TrialRunnr

-3

Frags

+

–

They did but also the meta and strats were very tribal at that time and they just couldnt go a run in other international tourneys, if they had a better showing internationally other than Masters 2, I would have put them lower.

#30

adilKhan

3

Frags

+

–

Sentinels of 2021 would legit get flattened by even KRU or Talon

#39

cobalt21312

5

Frags

+

–

yes because the game evolves. fnatic 2021 would get flattened by kru or talon

#6

I_HATE_MCE

0

Frags

+

–

Very accurate list

#7

SAMPV6

9

Frags

+

–

Saying Sentinels are a fluke cause all other teams had 0 idea how to play the game is so not fair.

Not their fault other teams were dogshit.

#10

WinterZ20

16

Frags

+

–

Gambit are not flukers lmfao

losing org backing is a big blow to any team and calling them cheaters because of that is just big copium

#25

TrialRunnr

-1

Frags

+

–

that was the only bait I had lol, tierbreak should be above them 🫣

#11

GreyDaze

4

Frags

+

–

Actual ranking
Acend
Optic(fpx didn't turn up, fnc's 2 best ayers weren't there)
Sen

None of the others are flukes

#12

TrialRunnr

-2

Frags

+

–

Fpx wouldnt have done shit even if they showed up as you can see by their placements in other international tournaments while Optic has consistently challenged for the title and were destined to win one.

#14

GreyDaze

5

Frags

+

–

They literally won the next event,placed top 4 at champions and top 4 at lock in💀. Optic were destined to win one, Reykjavik wasn't that event

#18

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

Top 4 at lock in doesnt really count when the only good team they played that event was Leviatan.
2 good placements are not enough to convince me.

#20

GreyDaze

0

Frags

+

–

Let's not count that then. The rest of 2022 still exists. If I am being harsh optic weren't even top 4 at Copenhagen. They lost to guild who were in an unlucky bracket who only lost to the eventual grand finalists fpx and prx. So optics only achievement that year was runner up at Champs. Even I can pull random bull shit arguments out of my ass

#21

TrialRunnr

-2

Frags

+

–

your arguments are bullshit cus factually Optic finished 3rd, just cus you dont accept that, it doesnt change the fact, whereas in lock in there was no lower bracket so it just increases the randomess of the placings.

#23

GreyDaze

0

Frags

+

–

So factually navi finished 4th then😭. It doesnt matter of there was no lower bracket. They still placed 4th. U do realize how hypocritical and biased ur argument is. Also u didn't address them winning the immediate next fking event and also placing top 4 at champions

#24

TrialRunnr

-2

Frags

+

–

Like i said lock in isnt a good measure cus the randomness of placings was very high because there being no lower bracket compared to the other events and them winning the next event really doesnt mean much cus LOUD went 0-2 the tournament before Champs, fpx could have had a similar result, we will never know

#28

GreyDaze

0

Frags

+

–

Loud also got grouped at Copenhagen and then won Champs immediately after.

Also again u completely skipped over the rest of 2022 and how fpx performed really great in those events

#13

calabasa

2

Frags

+

–

I think LOUD > Optic, they won Champs which is more prestigious, and they are almost as consistent internationally. H2H they're kinda tied, but Optic had a big lead early on and LOUD caught up which means theyre more successful recently.

#16

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

I initially had Optic at 5 and Loud at 6 but, LOUD has bombed out twice internationally whereas Optic core has only had one bad run, its very close tho.

#17

calabasa

0

Frags

+

–

thats fair, i just think loud roster is more talented w/ equalish success

#29

Selex

0

Frags

+

–

I don't really understand the logic. If loud was more talented roster wise than Optic with similar success, doesn't that just prove even more so that optic is less fraudulent?

#33

calabasa

0

Frags

+

–

i think loud is more successful, (champions > masters) and they win the H2H. I think they're more talented in that, I just straight up think theyre better and can beat more teams. Speaking about Prime LOUD vs Optic btw. Like in sports, when ranking all time greats who are pretty equal in achievements, edge goes to the guy who is more talented (like KG > Dirk in basketball).

#40

Selex

0

Frags

+

–

Lets list achievements for both the Loud/Optic cores in international events

Optic core:
2nd Masters Berlin 2021
9th-12th Champions 2021
1st Masters Reykjavík 2022
3rd Masters Copenhagen 2022
2nd Champions 2022
5th-8th Lock-In 2023
4th Masters Tokyo 2023

Loud Core:
2nd Masters Reykjavík 2022
11th-12th Masters Copenhagen 2022
1st Champions 2022
2nd Lock-In 2023
7th-8th Masters Tokyo 2023

I disagree with the idea champions>masters. The additional 4 teams that attend champions don't make winning the tournament significantly(or even much at all) more difficult than winning masters. Also, I don't think the achievements listed make them pretty equal. In my opinion, the optic core definitely have the edge with showing such consistency over such a long period of time.

#34

calabasa

0

Frags

+

–

i think loud is more successful, (champions > masters) and they win the H2H. I think they're more talented in that, I just straight up think theyre better and can beat more teams. Speaking about Prime LOUD vs Optic btw. Like in sports, when ranking all time greats who are pretty equal in achievements, edge goes to the guy who is more talented (like KG > Dirk in basketball).

#15

cboomer

0

Frags

+

–

never understood how sen was a fraud win

every team there was established its not like lock\in where teams had no practice etc

there was no unfair advantage for sentinels lmfao

#22

TrialRunnr

-1

Frags

+

–

True but the other teams are just more consistent internationally, so cant place them below anyone else.

#19

moshimoshiman24

2

Frags

+

–

so basically the early winners r flukes bc they faced plumbers and werent consistent

#27

hekzy

-1

Frags

+

–

#1 is floptic. Fully fraudulent tournament with the biggest amount of absentees BY FAR.

#31

douradoxp

0

Frags

+

–

great list even tho im a loud fan, i agree that optic might be placed higher because of the consistent, always getting top positions on every tournament. also i dont like fnatic but you cannot place them anywhere but first place, two international titles and a great team, all four (not boaster at all) super consistent players, great decision makers and aimers
edit: i thought this was an actual normal rank list, but its a fraud list lmfao, but i keep my point

#37

TrialRunnr

-1

Frags

+

–

Gambit is the only one I trolled lol, it’s pretty legit other than that

#32

brahianv

1

Frags

+

–

Optic is has the most fraudulent win in valorant history. A Tournament where Multiple teams not going sorry but this the most fluke one by far this facts. Anyone who does not agree is an NA or NRG fanboy.

#35

kfox

3

Frags

+

–

Like fair points but idk, they could've won 2 other tournaments if they just won the grand final, and they're just so consistent. Like it's hard to say a team is a fraudulent when they've finished top 4 in 5 out of 7 last international tournaments. Plus there's only been 8 international tournaments ever. So like not rlly a fraud

#36

Asuna_Yuuki

0

Frags

+

–

If LOUD was a superteam, OpTic was also a superteam

#38

SmartPerson

0

Frags

+

–

they are superteams

#41

TrialRunnr

-2

Frags

+

–

Changed it :))))

#43

msarez

1

Frags

+

–

wow this is a dog list

#42

beral

0

Frags

+

–

alternative title emea hate

#44

TrialRunnr

-1

Frags

+

–

I have Sentintels as 2nd? How am I hating a region when I am putting one of Americas winners 2nd?

#45

beral

0

Frags

+

–

tierbreak??? you made a toxic treat with those statements
you literally called gambit and fnatic fluke and fraud just go to bed and have a good night sleep

#49

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

fine, I will put a tierbreak above Gambit

#52

beral

0

Frags

+

–

just stop writing this treat. These teams had already won their tournaments years and mounts passed. and most importantly don't be toxic have a good day Mr or mrs.

#46

61Hiko

2

Frags

+

–

doesn't mention optics win, when fpx couldn't attend masters and fnatic had to play with subs

#47

TrialRunnr

-3

Frags

+

–

fpx would not have done shit as we have seen how unsuccesful that core has been and Fnatic were the the biggest chokers in valorant history before they formed a superteam and the competition dwindled

#58

61Hiko

0

Frags

+

–

fpx won regionals? what is blud waffling about. They would have obliterated any team

#59

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

sure buddy like they did in Champs

#48

kazu_to

-3

Frags

+

–

WHY YOU CALLED LOCK/IN A MICKEY MOUSE ? WHAT DISNEY HAVE DO TO WITH これ

IT 32 TEAM TOURNEY FROM TEAMS FROM ALL REGIONS ARE YOU THE STUPID ??

#51

funny_prank

0

Frags

+

–

Bro thinks everyone are flukers

#54

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

of course not, look at the tierbreak

#55

kamisavitar

1

Frags

+

–

W list bro...
Guy spittin facts

#56

clutchzero

0

Frags

+

–

i must agree with FPX.

all PRX needed to beat FPX was forsaken playing jett on that fckin breeze.

that troll comp with breach and astra couldn't fuck up everything IF FORSAKEN PLAYED JETT. He literally would get all necessary duels he lost and wouldn't die many times in a stupid way because of poor mechanics from the agent.

#57

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

Man I wanted PRX to win that one so bad, would have been great to see an APAC team win a tournament.

#60

deadpark

0

Frags

+

–

i just cant agree with the Gambit and Sentinels thing. Sentinels winning is just "it is what it is", teams werent ready at that time. Gambit just couldnt keep up with the meta changes

#61

TrialRunnr

0

Frags

+

–

Gambit is just a lil troll, they were a very good team but honestly they should have achieved more with how good their players looked in their prime

#62

deadpark

0

Frags

+

–

its just sad that they lost that final to Acend

Fluke winners ranked

bro why are u mixing up being consistent in all time valorant with having a fluke win???

also Gambit wasnt cheating. They worked 12 hours a day for the Berlin win