Grand FInals bans

#1

Wronghand

I think the grand finals bans is way too strong of an advantage. I understand that it is necessary to have an upper advantage, but it can literally take a 4-3 series to a 3-1. I think the best way to do it is just removing the bans of the lower team.

Example: Right now it is
Ban - Ban - Pick - Pick - Pick - Pick - Pick

I think it should be
Ban - Pick - Pick - Ban - Pick - Pick - Pick

In this scenario, it still lets through the weakest map of the losers team, but I denies the current system of permaban + ban the best map the opponents. I think it adds more interesting impact upon the map picks, and lowers the INSANE advantage given to the winner seed. You can then select either your second weakest map or huge swing maps with the second ban.

#2

turkey

0

Frags

+

–

kinda smart ngl

#3

tariksballzshair

0

Frags

+

–

why did fnatic get to ban both maps?

#7

Wronghand

0

Frags

+

–

Just what uppers get. Always has been. I've never been a fan of the ban system.

#8

Vlr_Kp

0

Frags

+

–

Ban system should be there, obviously you won upper finals, you get some benefits

#9

Wronghand

2

Frags

+

–

I like the advantage, I don't like banning the best map of the losers AND the worst map of the winners. I'd much rather see a series where either side either leaks their best maps in, or reveals their weakest in. Two bans for the winners is fine, just adding a map round in between seems like a better system imo.

#11

Vlr_Kp

0

Frags

+

–

I love that idea, the 2 bans with picks between works i guess

#4

NANNE

0

Frags

+

–

Pretty good

#5

Vlr_Kp

0

Frags

+

–

Your idea is great

#6

DannyBananas

-2

Frags

+

–

use this a + frag

#10

acels2

-2

Frags

+

–

nah its so useless, upper bracket should be 1 map up instantly