If G2 played with Acend and SMB played with F4Q today, everyone would be saying “G2 so trash onliners, SMB looks good and F4Q trash”
Before this, I said SMB saved strats against FPX and no one believed me but it was true because they destroyed G2 (also people forgot that too)
Then I said Acend saved strats against SMB and Gambit and no one believed me because 90% of this site dont understand the pro games while watching, they dont know strats, they dont know counters, they only know who clicked head better that game. They dont know whats going on, most of them even thinks NA is most tactical region, but 100T is one of the least tactical teams I have ever watched on Bind, against SEN. Unless they saved strats which is possible because I didnt watch most of their games. But I saw the same lack of strats in some other matches too so I dont know until they play in Berlin.
What I am trying to say is, everyone on this site only considers a team’s last 2-3 matches while talking about them, and only considers results because they cant understand more, they dont have the knowledge.
First Acend now SMB.
So dont talk too soon and dont forget that SMB 26-9’d G2 and Acend was unbeatable for 4 months until “seeding” matches, and they lost to Gambit 3-1 in a seeding match few days after beating them 2-1 in the most important match of the playoffs.
Dont talk too soon and dont think like an alzheimer who only remembers last week, think more general and wider.
—Mr. xqcL