Parrots

So many VLR and twitter users are parrots. Just repeating things they heard without evidence and the worst thing is that is spreads.
So if you parrot again "Sacy didnt corrupted Less mind and there is no evidence for it" im gona lose it. Maybe you should show is proff that Scy DIDNT maniplate Less...

So many VLR and twitter users are parrots. Just repeating things they heard without evidence and the worst thing is that is spreads.
So if you parrot again "Sacy didnt corrupted Less mind and there is no evidence for it" im gona lose it. Maybe you should show is proff that Scy DIDNT maniplate Less...

So many VLR and twitter users are parrots. Just repeating things they heard without evidence and the worst thing is that is spreads.
So if you parrot again "Sacy didnt corrupted Less mind and there is no evidence for it" im gona lose it. Maybe you should show is proff that Scy DIDNT maniplate Less...

Both sides contain many parrots

useless to argue this, if you show them actual arguments and proof they will just ignore and downvote your post. bunch of clowns tbh

You’re one of them, not sure what ur waffling about

So many VLR and twitter users are parrots. Just repeating things they heard without evidence and the worst thing is that is spreads.
So if you parrot again "Sacy didnt corrupted Less mind and there is no evidence for it" im gona lose it. Maybe you should show is proff that Scy DIDNT maniplate Less...

Hi!! There is no way that you can prove a negative statement. In fact the legal system in many courts relies on the fact that you must prove someone has committed a crime instead of proving someone didnt commit it!

🦜🦜🦜