What I think everyone's ignoring

Sometimes it's not about a certain pro being good at a certain agent. Talking specifically for teams like GE and KC which had a complete new roster startup.
At times it could be that a certain player is not as good of a player in his role, but you're better at that role.
For eg, imagine player A is an S tier Jett and an S tier Kayo/Skye
Player B is an A tier Jett and an B tier Kayo/Skye.
The skill disparity from the Jetts is just one tier, (S -> A) but the flex one is of 2 tiers (S -> A -> B)
So overall it's better to put player B on Jett and Player A on the flex (depending on map)
In real terms, it's more like texture maybe a better Jett than SkRossi but because SkRossi is not as good as a Sova / Breach / Skye, Texture will play the flex and SkRossi goes Jett.

I’m happy for you or sad that happened

TLDR : Read everything starting from In Real terms... From the main post

texture just as much of a hit/miss player as skrossi, he carries they win he doesn’t they lose

Whatever you GE fans think i doubt your org will listen to the fans anyway. GE as an org has been cooking too much with no results to show for it.

They need to kick wronski and lighting fast out..if they want to win..

makes sense tbf