LOUD and FNC stats comparison

#1

titanwithpp

Leo
Rating - 1.34
ACS - 222.2
K/D - 1.48

Derke
Rating - 1.22
ACS - 264.8
K/D - 1.39

Chronicle
Rating - 1.21
ACS - 207
K/D - 1.26

Aspas
Rating - 1.18
ACS - 241.4
K/D - 1.23

Alfajer
Rating - 1.16
ACS - 209.4
K/D - 1.23

Less
Rating - 1.13
ACS - 219.8
K/D - 1.21

Cauanzin
Rating - 1.09
ACS - 213.7
K/D - 1.08

Tyuz
Rating - 1.07
ACS - 177.2
K/D - 0.97

Boaster
Rating - 1.06
ACS - 186.0
K/D - 0.93

Saadhak
Rating - 0.93
ACS - 193.6
K/D - 0.85

3 FNC players in top 5 based on ratings

#2

paNcada49

0

Frags

+

–

oh no now it's over

I just accept shitMEA supremacy

#3

titanwithpp

5

Frags

+

–

Its just a look at their individual performance before the match begins, why are you crying already?

#10

primaaugusta

2

Frags

+

–

icebox

#4

333triplethreat

-1

Frags

+

–

i dont get why people use rating when it literally includes survival rate as a massive thing. Acs is much more reliable

#5

titanwithpp

4

Frags

+

–

I think rating includes how much you can live and ACS counts fragging so if you see both of those stats you can kinda understand which player dies less and also frags if you see both of those numbers being high

#6

333triplethreat

2

Frags

+

–

who cares about how much u live tho, anyone can do that but not everyone can frag. rating won't help anyone in the game. Also, if you get carried by one of ur teammates 13-0 and u literally don't die cuz he kills everyone, ur rating would be high and that isn't something that you deserve. Acs is the reflection of ur performance

#9

orthoboy

0

Frags

+

–

FNC literally won many rounds by dragging opposite team to play time and they always plant in last 20 seconds and bait opposite team to push vlr rating is accurate living until end of your round shows discipline

#7

soraol

0

Frags

+

–

w post

#8

BigAbdi

0

Frags

+

–

W post