S:Navi,fnatic,cloud 9,Drx
A:Loud,Paper Rex,sentinels,100t,liquid,zeta,nrg,koi
B:Gen-g,t1,giants,leviatan,furia,talen,global,Dng
C:heretics,vitality,krü,evil geniuses,bbl,karmine Corp,team seyret,MIBR
D:rrq,futbolist
Their team is t2 at best
they just won EMEA tier 2
Fut is the only team with full t2
So? Majority of current tier 1 players were tier 2 before they got signed to teams considered tier 1. There's tier 2 players who are tier 1 level and vice versa
Like I get your point about them still being unproven, but your points aren't that good
Why are people hyping Fnatic and C9? and in what world are they better than SEN, PRX, LEV, and 100T.
Like objectively 100T is just the same team but better so they are already better than Fnatic. Same goes for LEV basically. and C9's only internationally standout player atm is Yay aka GOAT. but idk how they are gonna stack if they are throwing their second best player Leaf, off duelist.
NRG rebuild is probably gonna better than C9
Basically 100T is only making their roster better, and Fnatic is just fixing their roster's issues, aka taking the weight of 3 players off of Alfajer's back
100T is basically the same team + Cryo so they are only better. and lets say Fnatic and 100T were evenly matched teams last tourney, Every 100T player is now role for role better than Fnatic's besides Boaster is probably a better IGL. Idrk how stacked Fnatics new coaching staff is and ik losing seangares for 100T is gonna hurt but 100T vs Fnatic should be 100T> unless that coaching gap is really that big.
also for what its worth, Enzo was a incredible post plant anchor and saved fnatic from inting like 4 entire series' last year so I dont think Leo is actually a turbo pick people think it is, its just different. I guess thats how id put it. 100T is better, Fnatic is different
Anyway 0/8 keep coping