region ranking (facts only)

#1

pebu

this is not an opinion, just based on the % of teams that a region sent to champions that qualified for playoffs.
EMEA: 100% (3/3)
NA: 66% (2/3)
KR: 100% (1/1)
LATAM: 50%(1/2) [Tied with LATAM]
BR: 50% (1/2) [Tied with LATAM]
-=-=[Non-Qualifying]=-=-
APAC: 0% (0/3) [Tied with JP, EA for last]
EA: 0% (0/1) [Tied with APAC, JP for last]
JP: 0% (0/1) [Tied with APAC, EA for last]

#2

Kirya

0

Frags

+

–

I don't think it's a good idea to do this by % of teams that a region sent

#3

Styling911

0

Frags

+

–

You cant judge off regions by only statistics

some teams got lucky with "easy groups"

#14

cohnr

0

Frags

+

–

"(facts only)"

#4

sheahhhh

-3

Frags

+

–

Include weightage for top seeds vs Lower seeds
And also records between different regional matchups

#6

Shao_show

-2

Frags

+

–

Bro thinks being a top seed in groups mean something in playoffs. Sheahhh it's enough Buddy , you took too much Ls today. Go to bed

#7

sheahhhh

3

Frags

+

–

Being top seed means ur better than the lower seed teams are u stupid

#9

Kirya

1

Frags

+

–

Guild>>>Optic
WOOOOOOOOOOOOO Emea 3rd seed is better than NA's best team

#10

sheahhhh

-2

Frags

+

–

Obviously playoff results disprove that idiot

#11

Kirya

3

Frags

+

–

Sheahhhh not seeing the obvious irony but thanks to that you figured out that being a top seed doesn't mean it's a better team

#16

sheahhhh

0

Frags

+

–

no u have to assume it does until the playoffs results

#5

Enzolp

3

Frags

+

–

So if we only sent our first seed we would be the same as KR?
I think this would be more accurate if you do it by series won/lost

#8

Mortadelo

2

Frags

+

–

Doesn't make sense to judge by percentage if there's different amounts of spots

#12

pebu

0

Frags

+

–

it's by spots, percentage is the tiebreaker.

you can see that I put NA above KR

#13

chimpy

0

Frags

+

–

Wouldn’t it be better for the number of maps or matches won??

#15

pebu

0

Frags

+

–

no.