İ think no cuz duelists need high fire power
Oh i get what you're saying. Yeah it makes sense, but I think the reason why ange1 has impact on duelist is because he is a specific part of their executes. He goes into site and knows exactly what to call for. Of course I would prefer he stay on a more passive agent but he does show that ot can work.
if you want your duelist to also be the main fragger, then no.
if the duelist just needs to entry and create space, then sure.
for example. deffo fulfilled his role well. he couldn't frag. but at that time they had chronicle and nats.
now deffo is underperforming way too much and they are lagging behind in firepower so they need a fragger duelist, so they switch chronicle to duelist.
yeah, but the points still stays. redgar is only needed to fulfill his role and have a reasonable acs, he could igl. because nats and chronicle are the main fraggers.
but if redgar was needed to frag out, which he sometimes does, igl shouldn't be worrying about kills.
nobody is saying that duelists need to be fragger, they most often are because their kits amplify their ability to get kills, especially when put together with good ability usage by the other roles.
but m3c is a good example for not needing a hard carry duelist. so it is the perfect analogy.
it depends, sometimes playing duelist can be good because you entry and usually die/ get yours but when u die u can then just play like an overwatch position and guide ur team, also as a the entry, you see a lot of what is going on the site and u can react accordingly, where is if your lurk or playing back it can be harder to read